Abstract
The present investigation was carried out during 2001–02 and 2002–03. The results revealed that imidacloprid seed treatments were found most safer for natural enemies of Earias vittella in okra field. Among the foliar spray endosutfan spray was safe to natural enemies whereas fenvalerate was found most toxic. Foliar spray of imidacloprid was found safer to spiders but proved least safer to other natural enemies.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid seed treatment was the safest insecticide for natural enemies of Earias vittella in okra.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid seed treatmentse1
- Interactor
- natural enemies of Earias vittella
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=60)
Earias vittellae1biocontrol_agent - Second interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- natural enemies of Earias vittellae1
- Direction
- most safere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“okra field”
e1“imidacloprid seed treatments were found most safer for natural enemies of Earias vittella in okra field”
Claim · model-written summary
Endosulfan spray was safe to natural enemies in okra, in contrast with fenvalerate.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- endosutfan spraye2
- Interactor
- natural enemiese2biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- natural enemiese2
- Direction
- safee2
- Comparator
- fenvaleratee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“okra field”
e2“Among the foliar spray endosutfan spray was safe to natural enemies whereas fenvalerate was found most toxic”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenvalerate was the most toxic foliar spray to natural enemies in okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- fenvaleratee2
- Interactor
- natural enemiese2biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- natural enemiese2
- Direction
- most toxice2
- Comparator
- endosutfan spraye2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“okra field”
e2“Among the foliar spray endosutfan spray was safe to natural enemies whereas fenvalerate was found most toxic”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar imidacloprid was safer to spiders in okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Foliar spray of imidaclopride3
- Outcome
- spiderse3
- Direction
- safere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“okra field”
e3“Foliar spray of imidacloprid was found safer to spiders but proved least safer to other natural enemies”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar imidacloprid was least safe to other natural enemies in okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Foliar spray of imidaclopride3
- Interactor
- other natural enemiese3biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- other natural enemiese3
- Direction
- least safere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“okra field”
e3“Foliar spray of imidacloprid was found safer to spiders but proved least safer to other natural enemies”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · Araneae · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
imidacloprid · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →seed treatment · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.