Paper · 2004 · The Korean Journal of Crop Science

Improvement of Shoot Regeneration from Scutella-Derived Callus in Rice

Joon Hyeong Cho; Jang Yong Lee; Yong Wook Kim

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The optimized in vitro culture system was investigated for improvement of regeneration efficiencies by observing the responses of scutella-derived callus of Korean rice (Oryza sativa L.). Large variations of callus induction (43.9-93.9%) and shoot regeneration (0-88.7%) were observed among the rice cultivars depending on medium. However, shoot regeneration was significantly improved by selected utilization of basal medium, growth regulators, and carbon sources. N6 basal medium was more efficient for embryogenic callus induction than MS or LS basal medium, while MS was superior to N6 for shoot regeneration. The calli of highly regenerative cultivars grew faster and showed higher rates of green tissue formation (GT) and shoot regeneration (SR) and lower rate of callus browning (CB) than those of recalcitrant cultivars. Although a higher level of kinetin stimulated the GT and SR in highly regenerative cultivars, 10 ㎎L?¹ kinetin generally suppressed the GT and SR, while CB was accelerated compared to 2 ㎎L?¹ kinetin. Additional benefits of sorbitol combined with maltose (or sucrose) under 5 ㎎L?¹ kinetin were certainly confirmed on regeneration efficiencies compared to sucrose alone as carbon source and osmotic regulator. This combination showed high rate of GT and SR with multiple shoots while low rate of CB. With MSRK5SM-Pr medium (5 ㎎L?¹ kinetin, 3% sorbitol, 2% maltose, 500 ㎎L?¹ proline), the regeneration efficiencies of total 17 out of 24 cultivars were practically improved 160% on average compared to MSRK2S (2 ㎎L?¹ kinetin, 3% sucrose) control medium. Especially, the medium was most effective to the cultivars showing a medium level of regenerability such as Daesanbyeo and Dongjinbyeo and Suwon477, enhancing efficiencies more than 300-600% compared to MSRK2S medium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus induction and shoot regeneration varied among cultivars and media.

Outcome
callus inductione0
Value
43.9-93.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large variations of callus induction (43.9-93.9%) and shoot regeneration (0-88.7%) were observed among the rice cultivars depending on medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot regeneration ranged from 0 to 88.7%.

Outcome
shoot regeneratione0
Value
0-88.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot regeneration (0-88.7%) were observed among the rice cultivars depending on medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N6 was more efficient for embryogenic callus induction than MS or LS.

Treatment
N6 basal mediume0
Outcome
embryogenic callus inductione0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
MS or LS basal mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N6 basal medium was more efficient for embryogenic callus induction than MS or LS basal medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS surpassed N6 for shoot regeneration.

Treatment
MSe0
Outcome
shoot regeneratione0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
N6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MS was superior to N6 for shoot regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highly regenerative cultivars grew faster and had more green tissue and shoot regeneration but less browning.

Material
highly regenerative cultivarse0
Outcome
green tissue formation (GT) and shoot regeneration (SR)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
recalcitrant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The calli of highly regenerative cultivars grew faster and showed higher rates of green tissue formation (GT) and shoot regeneration (SR) and lower rate of callus browning (CB) than those of recalcitrant cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 ㎎L?¹ kinetin, green tissue and shoot regeneration were suppressed and browning accelerated versus 2 ㎎L?¹.

Treatment
10 ㎎L?¹ kinetine0
Outcome
GT and SRe0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
2 ㎎L?¹ kinetine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 ㎎L?¹ kinetin generally suppressed the GT and SR, while CB was accelerated compared to 2 ㎎L?¹ kinetin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbitol with maltose or sucrose improved regeneration relative to sucrose alone.

Treatment
sorbitol combined with maltose (or sucrose) under 5 ㎎L?¹ kinetine0
Outcome
regeneration efficienciese0
Direction
Additional benefitse0
Comparator
sucrose alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional benefits of sorbitol combined with maltose (or sucrose) under 5 ㎎L?¹ kinetin were certainly confirmed on regeneration efficiencies compared to sucrose alone as carbon source and osmotic regulator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSRK5SM-Pr improved regeneration in 17 of 24 cultivars by 160% on average.

Treatment
MSRK5SM-Pr mediume0
Outcome
regeneration efficienciese0
Direction
improvede0
Value
160%e0
Comparator
MSRK2Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With MSRK5SM-Pr medium (5 ㎎L?¹ kinetin, 3% sorbitol, 2% maltose, 500 ㎎L?¹ proline), the regeneration efficiencies of total 17 out of 24 cultivars were practically improved 160% on average compared to MSRK2S (2 ㎎L?¹ kinetin, 3% sucrose) control medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium enhanced regeneration more than 300-600% for medium-regenerability cultivars.

Treatment
the mediume0
Outcome
efficienciese0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
more than 300-600%e0
Comparator
MSRK2S mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the medium was most effective to the cultivars showing a medium level of regenerability such as Daesanbyeo and Dongjinbyeo and Suwon477, enhancing efficiencies more than 300-600% compared to MSRK2S medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑

kinetin · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

59 papers: 52 positive, 7 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

maltose · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

glucitol · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

sucrose · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

31 papers: 31 positive, 0 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

in vitro · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 140 positive, 25 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.