Paper · 2026 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Eco-friendly management of Earias vittella (Fabricius) using a novel sequential pest management strategy in okra ecosystem

D. K. Narwade; S. A. Pawar; M. Pushpalatha; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Earias vittella, the shoot and fruit borer, is one of the most destructive pests of okra, often causing yield losses exceeding 40%. Farmers largely depend on synthetic insecticides, leading to resistance, resurgence and ecological imbalance. Field trials were conducted during Summer 2022 and Kharif 2023 in a randomised block design (three replications) to evaluate the sequential pest management strategies integrating chemical, microbial and botanical agents. Sequential application of Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1) significantly reduced shoot infestation (2.33–5.68%) and fruit damage (6.83–12.49%), while maintaining coccinellid predator abundance. This treatment produced the highest marketable yield (190–202 q ha−1) with superior cost–benefit returns. The findings demonstrate that integrating microbial and botanical agents with selective insecticides offers a sustainable, eco-compatible, and economically rewarding solution for managing E. vittella in okra under open field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequential treatment significantly reduced shoot infestation to 2.33–5.68%.

Treatment
Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1)e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Second interactor
Metarhizium anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot infestatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.33–5.68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential application of Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1) significantly reduced shoot infestation (2.33–5.68%) and fruit damage (6.83–12.49%), while maintaining coccinellid predator abundance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) using a novel sequential pest management strategy in okra ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequential treatment significantly reduced fruit damage to 6.83–12.49%.

Treatment
Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1)e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Second interactor
Metarhizium anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6.83–12.49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential application of Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1) significantly reduced shoot infestation (2.33–5.68%) and fruit damage (6.83–12.49%), while maintaining coccinellid predator abundance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) using a novel sequential pest management strategy in okra ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequential treatment maintained coccinellid predator abundance.

Treatment
Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1)e0
Interactor
coccinellide0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
coccinellid predator abundancee0
Direction
maintaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential application of Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1) significantly reduced shoot infestation (2.33–5.68%) and fruit damage (6.83–12.49%), while maintaining coccinellid predator abundance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced the highest marketable yield, 190–202 q ha−1.

Treatment
Sequential application of Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1)e1
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
190–202 q ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment produced the highest marketable yield (190–202 q ha−1) with superior cost–benefit returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sequential application of Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment had superior cost–benefit returns.

Treatment
Sequential application of Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1)e1
Outcome
cost–benefit returnse0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment produced the highest marketable yield (190–202 q ha−1) with superior cost–benefit returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sequential application of Metarhizium anisopliae (5 g L−1) → emamectin benzoate (0.5 g L−1) → azadirachtin (2 mL L−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑

emamectin benzoate · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

azadirachtin · quality: postharvest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

emamectin benzoate · quality: postharvest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Metarhizium anisopliae · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Metarhizium anisopliae · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

azadirachtin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Metarhizium anisopliae · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

azadirachtin · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.