Abstract
A field trial was conducted at the research plot at Central Research Farm (CRF), Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, during the Rabi Season of 2022-2023 where eight treatments were replicated thrice in Randomized Block Design (RBD) Eight treatments i.e., Lambda cyhalothrin 2.5% EC @ 0.3ml/lit, Emamectin benzoate 5% SG @0.5ml/lit ,Spinosad 45%SC@1.3 ml/lit, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC @0.5 ml/lit, Imidacloprid 17.80%SL @0.5ml/lit, Azadirachtin 1% EC @ 10ml/lit, NSKE 5% @ 50 ml/lit and untreated Control. The data on the percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra third, seven and fourth day after spray reveal that all the insecticides and neem products were significantly superior over control. Among all the different treatments lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole (10.21% ,9.98%) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (11.45%, 12.29%), Spinosad 45%SC (13.86%, 14.11%), Imidacloprid 17.80% SL (16.94,15.87%), Lambda cyhalothrin 2.5%EC (17.83, 16.03%), Azadirachtin 1% EC (19.25%, 17.04%) and NSKE 5% (20.35%, 18.75%), control (24.84%, 25.98%). The yields among the treatment were significant. The yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (195.5 q/ha) (1:9.3) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (149.2q/ha), (1:8.2), Spinosad 45 % SC (140.2q/ha), (1:8.11), Imidacloprid 17.80SL (136.3q/ha), (1:7.9), Lambda cychalothrin 2.5 EC (133.2q/ha), (1:7.6), Azadirachtin 1% (96.3q/ha) (1:5.5) and NSKE 5% (92.4q/ha) (1:5.2) as compared to, control (72.2q/ha), (1:4.2).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
All insecticides and neem products significantly reduced the infestation of okra by the shoot and fruit borer compared with control.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- insecticides and neem productse0
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borere0pest
- Outcome
- percent infestatione0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The data on the percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra third, seven and fourth day after spray reveal that all the insecticides and neem products were significantly superior over control”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole gave the lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra (10.21% and 9.98%).
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Organ / stage
- shoot and fruite0
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprolee0
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borere1pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 10.21% ,9.98%e0
- Qualifier
- 24.84%, 25.98%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole (10.21% ,9.98%)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“control (24.84%, 25.98%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5%SG gave the second-lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra (11.45% and 12.29%).
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse3
- Organ / stage
- shoot and fruite3
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate 5%SGe0
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borere1pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione3
- Direction
- lowerinferrede3
- Value
- 11.45%, 12.29%e0
- Qualifier
- 24.84%, 25.98%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (11.45%, 12.29%)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“control (24.84%, 25.98%)”
e3“lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45%SC gave a lower shoot and fruit infestation of okra (13.86% and 14.11%).
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse3
- Organ / stage
- shoot and fruite3
- Treatment
- Spinosad 45%SCe0
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borere1pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione3
- Direction
- lowerinferrede3
- Value
- 13.86%, 14.11%e0
- Qualifier
- 24.84%, 25.98%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spinosad 45%SC (13.86%, 14.11%)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“control (24.84%, 25.98%)”
e3“lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid 17.80% SL gave a lower shoot and fruit infestation of okra (16.94 and 15.87%).
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse3
- Organ / stage
- shoot and fruite3
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid 17.80% SLe0
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borere1pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione3
- Direction
- lowerinferrede3
- Value
- 16.94,15.87%e0
- Qualifier
- 24.84%, 25.98%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Imidacloprid 17.80% SL (16.94,15.87%)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“control (24.84%, 25.98%)”
e3“lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Lambda cyhalothrin 2.5%EC gave a lower shoot and fruit infestation of okra (17.83 and 16.03%).
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse3
- Organ / stage
- shoot and fruite3
- Treatment
- Lambda cyhalothrin 2.5%ECe0
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borere1pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione3
- Direction
- lowerinferrede3
- Value
- 17.83, 16.03%e0
- Qualifier
- 24.84%, 25.98%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lambda cyhalothrin 2.5%EC (17.83, 16.03%)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“control (24.84%, 25.98%)”
e3“lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Azadirachtin 1% EC gave a lower shoot and fruit infestation of okra (19.25% and 17.04%).
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse3
- Organ / stage
- shoot and fruite3
- Treatment
- Azadirachtin 1% ECe0
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borere1pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione3
- Direction
- lowerinferrede3
- Value
- 19.25%, 17.04%e0
- Qualifier
- 24.84%, 25.98%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Azadirachtin 1% EC (19.25%, 17.04%)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“control (24.84%, 25.98%)”
e3“lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
NSKE 5% gave a lower shoot and fruit infestation of okra (20.35% and 18.75%).
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse3
- Organ / stage
- shoot and fruite3
- Treatment
- NSKE 5%e0
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borere1pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione3
- Direction
- lowerinferrede3
- Value
- 20.35%, 18.75%e0
- Qualifier
- 24.84%, 25.98%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NSKE 5% (20.35%, 18.75%)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“control (24.84%, 25.98%)”
e3“lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Yields differed significantly among the okra treatments.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Outcome
- yieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yields among the treatment were significant”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC gave the highest okra yield, 195.5 q/ha, above control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SCe0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 195.5 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1:9.3e0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (195.5 q/ha) (1:9.3)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“as compared to, control (72.2q/ha)”
e3“The yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5% SG gave an okra yield of 149.2 q/ha, above control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate 5% SGe0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 149.2q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1:8.2e0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (149.2q/ha), (1:8.2)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“as compared to, control (72.2q/ha)”
e3“The yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45 % SC gave an okra yield of 140.2 q/ha, above control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- Spinosad 45 % SCe0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 140.2q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1:8.11e0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spinosad 45 % SC (140.2q/ha), (1:8.11)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“as compared to, control (72.2q/ha)”
e3“The yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid 17.80SL gave an okra yield of 136.3 q/ha, above control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid 17.80SLe0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 136.3q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1:7.9e0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Imidacloprid 17.80SL (136.3q/ha), (1:7.9)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“as compared to, control (72.2q/ha)”
e3“The yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in”
Claim · model-written summary
Lambda cychalothrin 2.5 EC gave an okra yield of 133.2 q/ha, above control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- Lambda cychalothrin 2.5 ECe0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 133.2q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1:7.6e0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lambda cychalothrin 2.5 EC (133.2q/ha), (1:7.6)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“as compared to, control (72.2q/ha)”
e3“The yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in”
Claim · model-written summary
Azadirachtin 1% gave an okra yield of 96.3 q/ha, above control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- Azadirachtin 1%e0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 96.3q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1:5.5e0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Azadirachtin 1% (96.3q/ha) (1:5.5)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“as compared to, control (72.2q/ha)”
e3“The yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in”
Claim · model-written summary
NSKE 5% gave an okra yield of 92.4 q/ha, above control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- NSKE 5%e0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 92.4q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1:5.2e0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NSKE 5% (92.4q/ha) (1:5.2)”
e1“percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on okra”
e2“as compared to, control (72.2q/ha)”
e3“The yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in”
The same questions in other papers
lambda-cyhalothrin · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →emamectin benzoate · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →chlorantraniliprole · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →azadirachtin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
spinosad · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →chlorantraniliprole · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →spinosad · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.