Abstract
The yellow vein mosaic virus (YVMV) disease of okra [Abulmoschuse sculentus (Linnaeus) Moench.] caused by virus is a common and highly destructive disease in Mewar region of Rajasthan. The experiments were conducted under field condition to develop the effective, safe and economical management strategies through evaluation of agro-insecticides and botanicals. Among insecticides and botanicals evaluated, two foliar sprays of Imidacloprid 17.8 per cent SL and two sprays Azadirachtin were found effective against YVMV disease of okra. Maximum per cent efficacy of disease control (77.6 %) and per cent increase in yield (70.37 %) was recorded when plant were sprayed with Imidacloprid 17.8 per cent SL twice followed by two sprays of Azadirachtin 1500 ppm which was followed by two sprays of Imidacloprid and two sprays of Karanj oil 77.7 per cent and 63.31 per cent increase in fruit yields. All insecticides and botanicals alone or in their combinations increased the fruit yield. However, maximum increase was observed by two sprays of Imidacloprid and two sprays of Azadirachtin, where increase was 79.30 per cent (2011) and 72.60 (2012) as compared to other treatments including untreated control. The minimum white fly population 2.9/plant (2011) and 2.4/plant (2012) was recorded when plant were sprayed with Imidacloprid plus Azadirachtin followed by 2.8/plant (2011) and 3.6/plant (2012) white fly population was recorded when crop was sprayed with Imidacloprid plus Karanj oil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Two sprays of imidacloprid with azadirachtin were effective against okra YVMV disease.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- two foliar sprays of Imidacloprid 17.8 per cent SL and two sprays Azadirachtine0
- Interactor
- YVMVe0pathogen
- Outcome
- YVMV diseasee0
- Direction
- effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“two foliar sprays of Imidacloprid 17.8 per cent SL and two sprays Azadirachtin were found effective against YVMV disease of okra.”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid followed by azadirachtin gave 77.6% disease control efficacy.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid 17.8 per cent SL twice followed by two sprays of Azadirachtin 1500 ppme0
- Interactor
- yellow vein mosaic virusYellow vein mosaic virust0pathogen
- Outcome
- efficacy of disease controle0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 77.6 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum per cent efficacy of disease control (77.6 %) and per cent increase in yield (70.37 %) was recorded when plant were sprayed with Imidacloprid 17.8 per cent SL twice followed by two sprays of Azadirachtin 1500 ppm”
t0“yellow vein mosaic virus disease of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid followed by azadirachtin increased yield by 70.37%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid 17.8 per cent SL twice followed by two sprays of Azadirachtin 1500 ppme0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 70.37 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum per cent efficacy of disease control (77.6 %) and per cent increase in yield (70.37 %) was recorded when plant were sprayed with Imidacloprid 17.8 per cent SL twice followed by two sprays of Azadirachtin 1500 ppm”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus Karanj oil increased fruit yield by 63.31%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- two sprays of Imidacloprid and two sprays of Karanj oile0
- Outcome
- fruit yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 63.31 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two sprays of Imidacloprid and two sprays of Karanj oil 77.7 per cent and 63.31 per cent increase in fruit yields.”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
All tested insecticides and botanicals, alone or combined, increased fruit yield.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- insecticides and botanicalse0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All insecticides and botanicals alone or in their combinations increased the fruit yield.”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus azadirachtin increased yield by 79.30% in 2011.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- two sprays of Imidacloprid and two sprays of Azadirachtine0
- Outcome
- increasee0
- Direction
- maximum increasee0
- Value
- 79.30 per cente0
- Qualifier
- 2011e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum increase was observed by two sprays of Imidacloprid and two sprays of Azadirachtin, where increase was 79.30 per cent (2011) and 72.60 (2012) as compared to other treatments including untreated control.”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus azadirachtin increased yield by 72.60 in 2012.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- two sprays of Imidacloprid and two sprays of Azadirachtine0
- Outcome
- increasee0
- Direction
- maximum increasee0
- Value
- 72.60e0
- Qualifier
- 2012e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum increase was observed by two sprays of Imidacloprid and two sprays of Azadirachtin, where increase was 79.30 per cent (2011) and 72.60 (2012) as compared to other treatments including untreated control.”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus azadirachtin gave 2.9 whiteflies per plant in 2011.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid plus Azadirachtine0
- Interactor
- white flye0pest
- Outcome
- white fly populatione0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 2.9/plante0
- Qualifier
- 2011e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The minimum white fly population 2.9/plant (2011) and 2.4/plant (2012) was recorded when plant were sprayed with Imidacloprid plus Azadirachtin”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus azadirachtin gave 2.4 whiteflies per plant in 2012.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid plus Azadirachtine0
- Interactor
- white flye0pest
- Outcome
- white fly populatione0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 2.4/plante0
- Qualifier
- 2012e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The minimum white fly population 2.9/plant (2011) and 2.4/plant (2012) was recorded when plant were sprayed with Imidacloprid plus Azadirachtin”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus Karanj oil gave 2.8 whiteflies per plant in 2011.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid plus Karanj oile0
- Interactor
- white flye0pest
- Outcome
- white fly populatione0
- Value
- 2.8/plante0
- Qualifier
- 2011e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2.8/plant (2011) and 3.6/plant (2012) white fly population was recorded when crop was sprayed with Imidacloprid plus Karanj oil.”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus Karanj oil gave 3.6 whiteflies per plant in 2012.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid plus Karanj oile0
- Interactor
- white flye0pest
- Outcome
- white fly populatione0
- Value
- 3.6/plante0
- Qualifier
- 2012e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2.8/plant (2011) and 3.6/plant (2012) white fly population was recorded when crop was sprayed with Imidacloprid plus Karanj oil.”
t0“okra”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →imidacloprid · Yellow vein mosaic virus · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
azadirachtin · Yellow vein mosaic virus · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
azadirachtin · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
azadirachtin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
imidacloprid · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →azadirachtin · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →imidacloprid · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
21 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.