Paper · 2010 · PubMed

Glycyrrhiza glabra extract protects plants against important phytopathogenic fungi.

C Schuster; S Konstantinidou-Doltsinis; A Schmitt

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In previous investigations an ethanolic plant extract from Glycyrrhiza glabra (2.5% w/v) showed 100% efficacy against late blight (Phytophthora infestans) on detached tomato leaves. Based on these findings, the objective of this work was to investigate the effect of this extract against different important plant pathogenic fungi. Tests were carried out on potted plants. Against P. infestans, efficacies of 75% and 58% were achieved on tomato and potato plants with 5% extract concentration, respectively. Against another Oomycete, Pseudoperonospora cubensis, on cucumber, application of a 2.5% extract led to an efficacy of above 90%. The EC50-value was calculated to be 0.5% In a trial on beans against bean rust (Uromyces appendiculatus), G. glabra extract (5% concentration) showed 92% efficacy. In contrast, against powdery mildew on cucumber (Podosphaera xanthii), no disease reduction was found. Overall, the results indicate a high potential for the extract of G. glabra to control a number of important plant pathogens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 5% extract gave 75% efficacy against P. infestans on tomato.

Treatment
5% extract concentratione0
Interactor
P. infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
efficaciese0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Against P. infestans, efficacies of 75% and 58% were achieved on tomato and potato plants with 5% extract concentration, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–506 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glycyrrhiza glabra extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 5% extract gave 58% efficacy against P. infestans on potato.

Treatment
5% extract concentratione0
Interactor
P. infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
efficaciese0
Value
58%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Against P. infestans, efficacies of 75% and 58% were achieved on tomato and potato plants with 5% extract concentration, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2.5% extract gave above 90% efficacy against Pseudoperonospora cubensis on cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
2.5% extracte0
Interactor
Pseudoperonospora cubensisPseudoperonospora cubensise0pathogen
Outcome
efficacye0
Value
above 90%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudoperonospora cubensis
Pseudoperonospora cubensis · InteractorChristian Hummert ( Ixitixel ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudoperonospora cubensis, on cucumber, application of a 2.5% extract led to an efficacy of above 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–636 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract EC50 was 0.5% in the cucumber trial.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Interactor
Pseudoperonospora cubensisPseudoperonospora cubensise1pathogen
Outcome
EC50-valuee0
Value
0.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudoperonospora cubensis
Pseudoperonospora cubensis · InteractorChristian Hummert ( Ixitixel ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EC50-value was calculated to be 0.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–678 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudoperonospora cubensis, on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 5% G. glabra extract gave 92% efficacy against bean rust.

Taxon
beanse0
Treatment
G. glabra extract (5% concentration)e0
Interactor
Uromyces appendiculatusUromyces appendiculatuse0pathogen
Outcome
efficacye0
Value
92%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Uromyces appendiculatus
Uromyces appendiculatus · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on beans against bean rust (Uromyces appendiculatus), G. glabra extract (5% concentration) showed 92% efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract did not reduce powdery mildew on cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
G. glabra extracte1
Interactor
Podosphaera xanthiiPodosphaera xanthiie0pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe0
Direction
no disease reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Podosphaera xanthii
Podosphaera xanthii · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against powdery mildew on cucumber (Podosphaera xanthii), no disease reduction was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–903 · show in text ↑
e1

“G. glabra extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–761 · show in text ↑

botanical · Podosphaera xanthii · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

botanical · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

botanical · Uromyces appendiculatus · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Pseudoperonospora cubensis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.