Paper · 2024 · Archives of Agriculture Sciences Journal/Archives of Agriculture Sciences Journal

Efficacy of certain plant extracts on controlling bean rust

M. F. A. Ahmed; H. H. Yoness; M. M. Amin

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The water extracts of basil, henna, lemongrass, marjoram, and thyme were used at three concentrations (S/2, S/4, and S/8) to study their impact on Uromyces appendiculatus (Pers. ex Pers.), the causative agent of bean rust in vitro and at S/2 concentration in vivo, in the presence of the fungicide Domark 10 EC at 0.5 ml/ L as check. In vitro, all treatments reduced the germination percentage, and the inhibition increased with concentration. Domark emerged as the most potent agent, inhibiting spore germination by 91.9%, followed by lemongrass with a germination inhibition rate of 76.0% at S/2 concentration. In vivo evaluations conducted in Khatatba, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt during the agricultural seasons 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 underscored the substantial benefits of these treatments not only in mitigating the frequency and severity of U. appendiculatus infections but also in a significant increase in crop yield and an elevation in total carbohydrates, protein content, and phenolic enzyme activities in bean plants, including peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase. Among the tested extracts, lemongrass outperformed others, followed closely by marjoram, while basil ranked the lowest in efficacy. These findings underscore the potential of both chemical and natural treatments in managing Uromyces appendiculatus. The superior performance of lemongrass and marjoram highlights their relevance in integrated disease management strategies, providing valuable options for enhancing nutritional quality and bean yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All plant extract treatments reduced in vitro germination of Uromyces appendiculatus spores, with inhibition increasing with concentration.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
water extracts of basil, henna, lemongrass, marjoram, and thymee0
Interactor
Uromyces appendiculatusUromyces appendiculatuse0pathogen
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
In vitroe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Uromyces appendiculatus
Uromyces appendiculatus · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling bean rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The water extracts of basil, henna, lemongrass, marjoram, and thyme were used at three concentrations (S/2, S/4, and S/8) to study their impact on Uromyces appendiculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“In vitro, all treatments reduced the germination percentage, and the inhibition increased with concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Domark inhibited spore germination of Uromyces appendiculatus by 91.9% and was the most potent agent tested.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
Domarke2
Interactor
Uromyces appendiculatusUromyces appendiculatuse0pathogen
Outcome
spore germinatione2
Direction
inhibitinge2
Value
91.9%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Uromyces appendiculatus
Uromyces appendiculatus · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling bean rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The water extracts of basil, henna, lemongrass, marjoram, and thyme were used at three concentrations (S/2, S/4, and S/8) to study their impact on Uromyces appendiculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Domark emerged as the most potent agent, inhibiting spore germination by 91.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lemongrass inhibited germination of Uromyces appendiculatus spores by 76.0% at S/2 concentration.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
lemongrasse3
Interactor
Uromyces appendiculatusUromyces appendiculatuse0pathogen
Outcome
germination inhibition ratee3
Direction
inhibitione3
Value
76.0%e3
Qualifier
at S/2 concentratione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Uromyces appendiculatus
Uromyces appendiculatus · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling bean rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The water extracts of basil, henna, lemongrass, marjoram, and thyme were used at three concentrations (S/2, S/4, and S/8) to study their impact on Uromyces appendiculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e3

“lemongrass with a germination inhibition rate of 76.0% at S/2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field, the plant extract treatments mitigated the frequency and severity of Uromyces appendiculatus infections in bean.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
these treatmentse5
Interactor
U. appendiculatusUromyces appendiculatuse5pathogen
Outcome
frequency and severity of U. appendiculatus infectionse5
Direction
mitigatinge5
Setting
Khatatba, Menoufia Governorate, Egypte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Uromyces appendiculatus
Uromyces appendiculatus · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling bean rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“In vivo evaluations conducted in Khatatba, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt during the agricultural seasons 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 underscored the substantial benefits of these treatments not only in mitigating the frequency and severity of U. appendiculatus infections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant extract treatments increased bean crop yield.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
these treatmentse5
Outcome
crop yielde6
Direction
increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“controlling bean rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“In vivo evaluations conducted in Khatatba, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt during the agricultural seasons 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 underscored the substantial benefits of these treatments not only in mitigating the frequency and severity of U. appendiculatus infections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–878 · show in text ↑
e6

“a significant increase in crop yield and an elevation in total carbohydrates, protein content, and phenolic enzyme activities in bean plants, including peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant extract treatments increased total carbohydrates and protein content in bean plants.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
these treatmentse5
Outcome
total carbohydrates, protein contente6
Direction
elevatione6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“controlling bean rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“In vivo evaluations conducted in Khatatba, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt during the agricultural seasons 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 underscored the substantial benefits of these treatments not only in mitigating the frequency and severity of U. appendiculatus infections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–878 · show in text ↑
e6

“a significant increase in crop yield and an elevation in total carbohydrates, protein content, and phenolic enzyme activities in bean plants, including peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant extract treatments elevated phenolic enzyme activities (peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase) in bean plants.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
these treatmentse5
Gene
peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyasee6
Outcome
phenolic enzyme activitiese6
Direction
elevatione6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“controlling bean rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“In vivo evaluations conducted in Khatatba, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt during the agricultural seasons 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 underscored the substantial benefits of these treatments not only in mitigating the frequency and severity of U. appendiculatus infections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–878 · show in text ↑
e6

“a significant increase in crop yield and an elevation in total carbohydrates, protein content, and phenolic enzyme activities in bean plants, including peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lemongrass outperformed the other tested extracts in efficacy.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
lemongrasse7
Outcome
efficacye7
Direction
outperformede7
Comparator
otherse7

Verbatim

t0

“controlling bean rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among the tested extracts, lemongrass outperformed others, followed closely by marjoram, while basil ranked the lowest in efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil ranked lowest in efficacy among the tested extracts.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
basile7
Outcome
efficacye7
Direction
loweste7
Comparator
otherse7

Verbatim

t0

“controlling bean rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among the tested extracts, lemongrass outperformed others, followed closely by marjoram, while basil ranked the lowest in efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marjoram followed closely behind lemongrass in efficacy.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
marjorame7
Outcome
efficacye7
Direction
followed closelye7
Comparator
lemongrasse7

Verbatim

t0

“controlling bean rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among the tested extracts, lemongrass outperformed others, followed closely by marjoram, while basil ranked the lowest in efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1238 · show in text ↑

Cymbopogon citratus · control · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Uromyces appendiculatus · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.