Paper · 2025 · Soil Advances

Surface liming, phosphogypsum and single superphosphate for grain production in a no-till wheat-soybean cropping system

Vanderson Modolon Duart; Eduardo Fávero Caires; Grazielle Schornobai; et al.

12
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Tropical and subtropical soils are acidic and have low nutrient reserves. To know how soil properties affect plant nutrition and crop yield, a field trial examined the effects of surface liming combined with single superphosphate (SSP) by broadcast and in the sowing furrow or phosphogypsum (PG) to the soil surface on the soil chemical properties and nutrition and yield of a wheat-soybean rotation under no-till in Southern Brazil. Surface-applied lime was effective in alleviating soil acidity from the soil surface to a 1.00 m depth. Combining liming with SSP or PG did not provide greater alleviation in acidity across the soil profile than lime alone. Liming increased Ca-leaf and Mg-leaf contents and reduced K-leaf content of wheat, as well as increased leaf contents of N, Ca, and Mg of soybean. Applying SSP, both broadcast or in the sowing furrow, and PG increased P and S leaf contents of wheat and soybean. The cumulative yield of five wheat harvests was increased by 40 % with surface lime, 54 % with surface lime + SSP in the sowing furrow, and 70 % with surface lime + SSP by broadcasting or PG to the soil surface. The cumulative yield of five soybean harvests was increased by 36 % with surface lime, regardless of the addition of SSP and PG. The combined use of surface liming either with broadcast SSP or with PG to the soil surface should be encouraged in a wheat-soybean cropping system under no-till because of the achievement of important increases in wheat yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface lime alleviated soil acidity to 1.00 m.

Treatment
Surface-applied limee0
Outcome
soil aciditye0
Direction
alleviatinge0
Value
1.00 me0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Surface-applied lime was effective in alleviating soil acidity from the soil surface to a 1.00 m depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding SSP or PG did not improve acidity alleviation beyond lime alone.

Treatment
Combining liming with SSP or PGe0
Outcome
alleviation in aciditye0
Direction
did not provide greatere0
Comparator
lime alonee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Combining liming with SSP or PG did not provide greater alleviation in acidity across the soil profile than lime alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased wheat leaf Ca and Mg and reduced leaf K.

Treatment
Liminge0
Outcome
Ca-leaf and Mg-leaf contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Liming increased Ca-leaf and Mg-leaf contents and reduced K-leaf content of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming reduced wheat leaf potassium.

Outcome
K-leaf contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced K-leaf content of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased soybean leaf N, Ca and Mg.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
leaf contents of N, Ca, and Mge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased leaf contents of N, Ca, and Mg of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP increased wheat and soybean leaf P and S.

Treatment
SSPe0
Outcome
P and S leaf contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying SSP, both broadcast or in the sowing furrow, and PG increased P and S leaf contents of wheat and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PG increased wheat and soybean leaf P and S.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
PGe0
Outcome
P and S leaf contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying SSP, both broadcast or in the sowing furrow, and PG increased P and S leaf contents of wheat and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface lime increased cumulative wheat yield by 40 %.

Treatment
surface limee0
Outcome
cumulative yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cumulative yield of five wheat harvests was increased by 40 % with surface lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime plus furrow SSP increased cumulative wheat yield by 54 %.

Treatment
surface lime + SSP in the sowing furrowe0
Outcome
cumulative yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
54 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“54 % with surface lime + SSP in the sowing furrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cumulative yield of five wheat harvests was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime plus broadcast SSP or PG increased cumulative wheat yield by 70 %.

Treatment
surface lime + SSP by broadcasting or PG to the soil surfacee0
Outcome
cumulative yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
70 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“70 % with surface lime + SSP by broadcasting or PG to the soil surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cumulative yield of five wheat harvests was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface lime increased cumulative soybean yield by 36 %.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
surface limee0
Outcome
cumulative yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cumulative yield of five soybean harvests was increased by 36 % with surface lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1217 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend surface liming with broadcast SSP or PG for no-till wheat-soybean systems.

Taxon
wheat-soybeane0
Outcome
combined use of surface liming either with broadcast SSP or with PGe0

Verbatim

e0

“The combined use of surface liming either with broadcast SSP or with PG to the soil surface should be encouraged in a wheat-soybean cropping system under no-till”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1422 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 108 positive, 33 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.