Paper · 2006 · Plant Disease

Root Diseases of Wheat and Barley During the Transition from Conventional Tillage to Direct Seeding

K. L. Schroeder; T. C. Paulitz

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
79
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The use of direct seeding (no-till) in place of tillage can reduce soil erosion and improve water infiltration. However, despite these improvements in soil quality, growers in the Pacific Northwest are reluctant to adopt direct seeding, partially because of fears of increased root diseases caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, Rhizoctonia spp., and Pythium spp. To examine the effect of the transition from conventional tillage to direct seeding, field plots were established at two locations. One site had been managed with direct seeding for 12 years, and the second had been conventionally tilled. Over 4 years, a portion of each plot was tilled or direct seeded, and planted to wheat or barley. Plants in the tilled plots had consistently more crown roots than plants in direct-seeded plots. Rhizoctonia root rot and yield did not differ between tillage types during the first 2 years of the study. However, in the third and fourth years of the transition to direct seeding, a higher incidence of Rhizoctonia root rot, increased hyphal activity of R. solani, and reduced yields were observed in direct-seeded plots. Populations of R. oryzae and Pythium spp., and incidence of take-all were the same for both management practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat and barley plants in tilled plots had consistently more crown roots than plants in direct-seeded plots.

Treatment
tilled plotse0
Outcome
crown rootse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
direct-seeded plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants in the tilled plots had consistently more crown roots than plants in direct-seeded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia root rot and yield did not differ between tillage types during the first 2 years of the transition.

Treatment
tillage typese0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
Rhizoctonia root rot and yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
first 2 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizoctonia root rot and yield did not differ between tillage types during the first 2 years of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third and fourth years of the transition, direct-seeded plots had a higher incidence of Rhizoctonia root rot.

Treatment
direct-seeded plotse0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of Rhizoctonia root rote0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher incidence of Rhizoctonia root rot, increased hyphal activity of R. solani, and reduced yields were observed in direct-seeded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third and fourth years of the transition, direct-seeded plots had increased hyphal activity of R. solani.

Treatment
direct-seeded plotse0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
hyphal activity of R. solanie0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher incidence of Rhizoctonia root rot, increased hyphal activity of R. solani, and reduced yields were observed in direct-seeded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third and fourth years of the transition, yields were reduced in direct-seeded plots.

Treatment
direct-seeded plotse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher incidence of Rhizoctonia root rot, increased hyphal activity of R. solani, and reduced yields were observed in direct-seeded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populations of R. oryzae were the same under both management practices.

Treatment
both management practicese0
Interactor
R. oryzaeWaitea circinatae0pathogen
Outcome
Populations of R. oryzaee0
Direction
the samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populations of R. oryzae and Pythium spp., and incidence of take-all were the same for both management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populations of Pythium spp. were the same under both management practices.

Treatment
both management practicese0
Interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume0pathogen
Outcome
Pythium spp.e0
Direction
the samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populations of R. oryzae and Pythium spp., and incidence of take-all were the same for both management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incidence of take-all was the same under both management practices.

Treatment
both management practicese0
Interactor
Gaeumannomyces graminis var. triticiGaeumannomyces triticie1pathogen
Outcome
incidence of take-alle0
Direction
the samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populations of R. oryzae and Pythium spp., and incidence of take-all were the same for both management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1244 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 17 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

tillage · Rhizoctonia · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

transplanting · Rhizoctonia solani · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.