Paper · 1994 · Agronomy Journal

Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat

Leland E. Francois; Catherine M. Grieve; Eugene V. Maas; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
116
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Salt tolerance of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is known to change during different stages of growth. The effects of salinity on growth and yield components of wheat at different stages of growth were determined in a 2‐yr field plot study at Brawley, CA. Four salinity levels were imposed on a Holtville silty clay [clayey over loamy, montmorillonitic (calcareous), hyperthermic Typic Torrifluvent] by irrigating with waters salinized with NaCl and CaCl 2 (1:1 w/w). Electrical conductivities of the irrigation waters were 1.4, 10.0, 20.0, and 30.0 dS m −1 in 1989, and 1.4, 8.0, 16.0, and 24.0 dS m −1 in 1990. The three irrigation treatments were (i) salinity imposed throughout the growing season, (ii) saline irrigation initiated after terminal spikelet differentiation (TSD), and (iii) saline irrigation discontinued at TSD. Growth and yield components measured were straw yield, total above ground biomass, number of spikelets per spike, number of kernels per spike, individual kernel weight, number of tillers per plant, and number of tiller spikes. Continuous salinity throughout the growing season significantly reduced all growth and yield components. Salinity imposed prior to TSD reduced the number of spikelets per spike and the number of tillers per plant, whereas salinity imposed after TSD significantly reduced only kernel number and weight. In general, the effect of salinity appears to be most pronounced on the yield components that are growing or developing at the time the salt stress is imposed. Total grain yields were maintained when moderately saline irrigation waters were substituted for good quality water during part of the growing season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous salinity significantly reduced wheat straw yield and aboveground biomass.

Treatment
Continuous salinity throughout the growing seasone0
Outcome
straw yield, total above ground biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield components measured were straw yield, total above ground biomass, number of spikelets per spike, number of kernels per spike, individual kernel weight, number of tillers per plant, and number of tiller spikes. Continuous salinity throughout the growing season significantly reduced all growth and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous salinity significantly reduced wheat spikelet, kernel and tiller counts.

Treatment
Continuous salinity throughout the growing seasone0
Outcome
number of spikelets per spike, number of kernels per spikee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield components measured were straw yield, total above ground biomass, number of spikelets per spike, number of kernels per spike, individual kernel weight, number of tillers per plant, and number of tiller spikes. Continuous salinity throughout the growing season significantly reduced all growth and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous salinity significantly reduced individual wheat kernel weight and tiller spikes.

Treatment
Continuous salinity throughout the growing seasone0
Outcome
individual kernel weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield components measured were straw yield, total above ground biomass, number of spikelets per spike, number of kernels per spike, individual kernel weight, number of tillers per plant, and number of tiller spikes. Continuous salinity throughout the growing season significantly reduced all growth and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity before terminal spikelet differentiation reduced wheat spikelets per spike and tillers per plant.

Treatment
Salinity imposed prior to TSDe0
Outcome
number of spikelets per spike and the number of tillers per plante0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity imposed prior to TSD reduced the number of spikelets per spike and the number of tillers per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1278 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity after terminal spikelet differentiation significantly reduced wheat kernel number and weight.

Treatment
salinity imposed after TSDe0
Outcome
kernel number and weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity imposed after TSD significantly reduced only kernel number and weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1366 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

Treatment
moderately saline irrigation waterse0
Outcome
Total grain yieldse0
Direction
maintainede0
Qualifier
during part of the growing seasone0
Comparator
good quality watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total grain yields were maintained when moderately saline irrigation waters were substituted for good quality water during part of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1677 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–56 · show in text ↑

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.