Paper · 2004 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effect of Pretreatment of Intact `Gala' Apple with Ethanol Vapor, Heat, or 1-Methylcyclopropene on Quality and Shelf Life of Fresh-cut Slices

Jinhe Bai; Elizabeth A. Baldwin; Robert C. Soliva Fortuny; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

`Gala' apples [ Malus silvestris (L.) var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] were treated with ethanol vapor (5 mL·kg -1 fruit for 24 hours at 25 °C), heat (4 days at 38 °C and >98% RH), or 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP; 1 or 0.625 μL·L -1 for 18 hours at 20 °C) before processing into slices, then dipped in anti-browning solutions or coatings, drained, and packaged in perforated polyethylene bags. Residual effects of pretreatments on fresh-cut slice physiological and quality attributes were investigated during storage for up to 19 days at 5.5 °C. Ethylene production was reduced by ethanol, heat, and 1-MCP pretreatments, while ethanol and heat also reduced slice respiration. Heat and 1-MCP pretreatments inhibited slice texture changes, while ethanol had no effect on instrumental texture measurements but reduced sensory firmness. Ethanol pretreatment increased the contents of ethanol and ethyl esters in slices but reduced acidity, while heat reduced both acidity and aroma volatile levels. Both ethanol and heat pretreatments led to lower sensory scores for apple flavor and ethanol-pretreated slices also received higher scores for altered flavor, although all scores were in the acceptable range. Slice acidity was best maintained by 1-MCP pretreatment. Shelf life based on appearance was 15 to 16 days for ethanol-pretreated slices and 12 days for heat-pretreated slices compared to that of control, which was 8 to 9 days, while 1-MCP pretreatment promoted decay development on the cut surface, which reduced the shelf life to 7 to 8 days. Obvious separations were determined between ethanol- and heat-pretreated slices and untreated control by canonical discriminant analysis of headspace volatile levels determined by GC and electronic nose. Therefore, pretreatments with ethanol and heat are very effective for prolonging visual shelf life at the expense of aroma quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol reduced ethylene production.

Treatment
ethanole0
Outcome
Ethylene productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene production was reduced by ethanol, heat, and 1-MCP pretreatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat reduced ethylene production.

Treatment
heate0
Outcome
Ethylene productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene production was reduced by ethanol, heat, and 1-MCP pretreatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced ethylene production.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
Ethylene productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene production was reduced by ethanol, heat, and 1-MCP pretreatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol reduced slice respiration.

Treatment
ethanole0
Outcome
slice respiratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethanol and heat also reduced slice respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat reduced slice respiration.

Treatment
heate0
Outcome
slice respiratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethanol and heat also reduced slice respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat inhibited texture changes.

Treatment
Heate0
Outcome
slice texture changese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat and 1-MCP pretreatments inhibited slice texture changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP inhibited texture changes.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
slice texture changese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat and 1-MCP pretreatments inhibited slice texture changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol reduced sensory firmness.

Treatment
ethanole0
Outcome
sensory firmnesse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethanol had no effect on instrumental texture measurements but reduced sensory firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol increased slice ethanol and ethyl esters.

Treatment
Ethanol pretreatmente0
Outcome
contents of ethanol and ethyl esterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethanol pretreatment increased the contents of ethanol and ethyl esters in slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol reduced acidity.

Treatment
Ethanol pretreatmente0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethanol pretreatment increased the contents of ethanol and ethyl esters in slices but reduced acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat reduced acidity and aroma volatiles.

Treatment
heate0
Outcome
acidity and aroma volatile levelse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat reduced both acidity and aroma volatile levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol lowered apple flavor scores.

Treatment
ethanole0
Outcome
sensory scores for apple flavore0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ethanol and heat pretreatments led to lower sensory scores for apple flavor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat lowered apple flavor scores.

Treatment
heate0
Outcome
sensory scores for apple flavore0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ethanol and heat pretreatments led to lower sensory scores for apple flavor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol increased altered flavor scores.

Treatment
ethanol-pretreatede0
Outcome
scores for altered flavore0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethanol-pretreated slices also received higher scores for altered flavor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑

ethanol · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

120 papers: 113 positive, 7 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

ethanol · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

ethanol · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

heat · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

heat · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

16 papers: 7 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

heat · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

42 papers: 34 positive, 8 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.