Paper · 2016 · Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências

Ethanol reduces ripening of 'Royal Gala' apples stored in controlled atmosphere

ANDERSON WEBER; AURI BRACKMANN; VANDERLEI BOTH; et al.

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
32
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This work aims at evaluate ethanol effect of acetaldehyde application in post-storage quality of 'Royal Gala' apples maintenance, and to compare them with consolidated storage techniques. Thus two experiments were performed during the years of 2008 and 2009. In the first experiment (2008), the application of ethanol, acetaldehyde or 1-MCP and ethylene scrubbing were tested. Fruits were stored in controlled atmosphere (CA) with 1.0kPa O2 and 2.0kPa CO2 at 0.5°C. In the second experiment (2009), the treatments tested were ethanol application combined or not with low relative humidity (LRH) and LRH alone. In this experiment, apples were stored in CA with 1.2kPa O2 + 2.5kPa CO2 at 0.5°C. After eight months of storage, 0.5 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1 or 0.25 mL acetaldehyde kg-1 apples month-1 increased mealiness, flesh browning, and decays incidence and reduced flesh firmness. In contrast, 0.3 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1, tested on second experiment, prevented fruit softening and decreased ACC oxidase activity and ethylene production. Although lower relative humidity was not efficient in maintaining post-storage quality, it enhanced the positive effect of ethanol application at 0.3 mL kg-1 apples month-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High ethanol increased mealiness, flesh browning and decay after eight months.

Treatment
0.5 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1e0
Outcome
mealiness, flesh browning, and decays incidencee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After eight months of storage, 0.5 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1 or 0.25 mL acetaldehyde kg-1 apples month-1 increased mealiness, flesh browning, and decays incidence and reduced flesh firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetaldehyde increased mealiness, flesh browning and decay after eight months.

Treatment
0.25 mL acetaldehyde kg-1 apples month-1e0
Outcome
mealiness, flesh browning, and decays incidencee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After eight months of storage, 0.5 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1 or 0.25 mL acetaldehyde kg-1 apples month-1 increased mealiness, flesh browning, and decays incidence and reduced flesh firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High ethanol reduced flesh firmness.

Treatment
0.5 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1e0
Outcome
flesh firmnesse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.5 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1 or 0.25 mL acetaldehyde kg-1 apples month-1 increased mealiness, flesh browning, and decays incidence and reduced flesh firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetaldehyde reduced flesh firmness.

Treatment
0.25 mL acetaldehyde kg-1 apples month-1e0
Outcome
flesh firmnesse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.5 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1 or 0.25 mL acetaldehyde kg-1 apples month-1 increased mealiness, flesh browning, and decays incidence and reduced flesh firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower ethanol prevented apple softening.

Treatment
0.3 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1e0
Outcome
fruit softeninge0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.3 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1, tested on second experiment, prevented fruit softening and decreased ACC oxidase activity and ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower ethanol decreased ACC oxidase activity and ethylene production.

Treatment
0.3 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1e0
Outcome
ACC oxidase activity and ethylene productione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.3 mL ethanol kg-1 apples month-1, tested on second experiment, prevented fruit softening and decreased ACC oxidase activity and ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low relative humidity did not maintain poststorage quality.

Treatment
lower relative humiditye0
Outcome
post-storage qualitye0
Direction
not efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower relative humidity was not efficient in maintaining post-storage quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low relative humidity enhanced the beneficial effect of low-dose ethanol.

Treatment
ethanol application at 0.3 mL kg-1 apples month-1e0
Outcome
positive effecte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it enhanced the positive effect of ethanol application at 0.3 mL kg-1 apples month-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1225 · show in text ↑

ethanol · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

ethanol · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ethanol · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

acetaldehyde · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

humidity · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.