Paper · 2009 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Impact of Innovative Controlled Atmosphere Storage Technologies and Postharvest Treatments on Volatile Compound Production in Cv. Pinova Apples

Antonio Raffo; Markus Kelderer; Flavio Paoletti; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
54
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Organically grown apples cv. Pinova harvested at two different dates were stored at 1.3 degrees C for up to 4 months in air, up to 7 months in ULO (1.5 kPa of O(2) and 1.3 kPa of CO(2)) and in dynamic controlled atmosphere (DCA) conditions (0.4-0.6 kPa of O(2) and 0.6-0.8 kPa of CO(2)); the DCA storage method involved the use of a chlorophyll fluorescence monitoring system in order to detect low-O(2) stress in apples and to allow for the dynamic adaptation of storage atmosphere to O(2) levels that were lower than in ULO but still tolerated by fruits. A postharvest 1-MCP treatment (for 24 h at 1.3 degrees C) and a hot water treatment (for 180 s at 50 degrees C) were also tested on apples stored afterward in ULO and air, respectively. Volatile compounds isolated from the pulp of fruits were measured after 4 and 7 months, just upon removal from storage and after 11 days at 22 degrees C. Total amount of aroma compounds detected in apples stored in DCA was markedly higher (from 2- to 4-fold) than in fruits exposed to 1-MCP + ULO but, at most sampling times, significantly lower than in ULO fruits. Moderate differences in storage atmosphere composition between ULO and DCA significantly affected both total amount and profile of volatile esters. Analogous effects were observed on the alcohol precursors of the main esters. Exposure to 1-MCP inhibited biosynthesis of straight-chain esters more than that of branched-chain esters. The hot water treatment did not seem to produce marked changes in volatile composition after four months of air storage, except for a sharp accumulation of aldehydes during the shelf-life time. DCA storage technology, besides avoiding any chemical treatment, can preserve apple aroma compounds better than 1-MCP + ULO during long-term storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DCA apples had two to four times more total aroma compounds than apples given 1-MCP and ULO storage.

Treatment
DCAe1
Outcome
Total amount of aroma compoundse1
Direction
markedly highere1
Value
2- to 4-folde1
Comparator
1-MCP + ULOe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pinova Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total amount of aroma compounds detected in apples stored in DCA was markedly higher (from 2- to 4-fold) than in fruits exposed to 1-MCP + ULO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At most sampling times, DCA apples had significantly less total aroma compound than ULO apples.

Treatment
DCAe2
Outcome
Total amount of aroma compoundse2
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
at most sampling timese1
Comparator
ULOe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pinova Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“at most sampling times, significantly lower than in ULO fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1107 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total amount of aroma compounds detected in apples stored in DCA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences between ULO and DCA atmospheres significantly affected total volatile ester amount.

Treatment
DCAe1
Outcome
total amounte1
Comparator
ULOe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pinova Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Moderate differences in storage atmosphere composition between ULO and DCA significantly affected both total amount and profile of volatile esters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences between ULO and DCA atmospheres significantly affected volatile ester profiles.

Treatment
DCAe1
Outcome
profile of volatile esterse1
Comparator
ULOe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pinova Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Moderate differences in storage atmosphere composition between ULO and DCA significantly affected both total amount and profile of volatile esters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage atmosphere had analogous effects on alcohol precursors of main esters.

Treatment
DCAe2
Outcome
alcohol precursors of the main esterse1
Comparator
ULOe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pinova Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Analogous effects were observed on the alcohol precursors of the main esters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1334 · show in text ↑
e2

“between ULO and DCA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP inhibited straight chain ester biosynthesis more than branched chain ester biosynthesis.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
biosynthesis of straight-chain esterse1
Direction
inhibitede1
Comparator
branched-chain esterse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pinova Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Exposure to 1-MCP inhibited biosynthesis of straight-chain esters more than that of branched-chain esters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water did not appear to markedly alter volatile composition after four months of air storage.

Treatment
hot water treatmente1
Outcome
volatile compositione1
Direction
did not seem to produce marked changese1
Qualifier
after four months of air storagee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pinova Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“The hot water treatment did not seem to produce marked changes in volatile composition after four months of air storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment sharply increased aldehydes during shelf life.

Treatment
hot water treatmente2
Outcome
aldehydese1
Direction
sharp accumulatione1
Qualifier
during the shelf-life timee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pinova Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“except for a sharp accumulation of aldehydes during the shelf-life time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1634 · show in text ↑
e2

“The hot water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1465 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

DCA storage can preserve apple aroma compounds better than 1-MCP plus ULO during long storage.

Treatment
DCA storage technologye1
Outcome
preserve apple aroma compounds better than 1-MCP + ULOe1
Qualifier
during long-term storagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pinova Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“DCA storage technology, besides avoiding any chemical treatment, can preserve apple aroma compounds better than 1-MCP + ULO during long-term storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1785 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

52 papers: 37 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

heat · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

heat · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

18 papers: 10 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 20 positive, 21 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.