Abstract
Background: Pulses are source of supplementary protein to daily diets based on cereals and starchy food for predominant vegetarian population. So, pluses are therefore often regarded as poor man’s meat. Greengram is third most important pulse crop growing after chickpea and pigeon pea in India. For maintain soil health, better quality crop production, organic fertilizer managements play important role. Methods: The experiment on nutrient management thought organic sources in summer green gram conducted with aim to know the effect of organic nutrient management on the growth, yield and quality of green gram at College Agronomy Farm, B.A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand during summer season of 2018 to 2020 in sandy loam soil of middle Gujarat. There were ten treatments of organic sources including no manures (control) treatment. They were replicated four times in randomized block design. Result: Three years experiment data revealed that application of vermicompost @0.5t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB) reported higher plant height at harvest, number of pods per plant, test weight, seed yield, harvest index and net return and BCR. Green gram haulm yield and soil microbial count was significantly higher in treatment T6 (FYM @ 2.0 t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB), treatment T8 (Castor cake @ 0.25 t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB), reported higher potassium content in haulm, Response of organic manures treatments found non-significant in case of initial plant population, plant height and number of branches per plant at 30 DAS, protein content, micronutrient content in seed, haulm and soil, except Mn in seed, heavy metal content in seed, haulm and soil, after harvest soil nutrient EC, organic carbon and available K2O, whereas same results also observed in case of nutrient content in seed and haulm.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost plus Bio NP gave higher plant height, pods per plant, test weight, seed yield and harvest index.
- Taxon
- green gram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatae1 - Treatment
- vermicompost @0.5t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB)e0
- Outcome
- plant height at harvest, number of pods per plant, test weight, seed yield, harvest indexe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no manures (control) treatmente2
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“application of vermicompost @0.5t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB) reported higher plant height at harvest, number of pods per plant, test weight, seed yield, harvest index”
e1“green gram at College Agronomy Farm”
e2“including no manures (control) treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost plus Bio NP gave higher net return and BCR.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae1
- Treatment
- vermicompost @0.5t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB)e0
- Outcome
- net return and BCRe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no manures (control) treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of vermicompost @0.5t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB) reported higher plant height at harvest, number of pods per plant, test weight, seed yield, harvest index and net return and BCR”
e1“green gram at College Agronomy Farm”
e2“including no manures (control) treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus Bio NP significantly increased green gram haulm yield and soil microbial count.
- Taxon
- Green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 2.0 t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB)e0
- Outcome
- haulm yield and soil microbial counte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no manures (control) treatmente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Green gram haulm yield and soil microbial count was significantly higher in treatment T6 (FYM @ 2.0 t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB)”
e1“including no manures (control) treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Castor cake plus Bio NP gave higher potassium content in haulm.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae1
- Treatment
- Castor cake @ 0.25 t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB)e0
- Outcome
- potassium content in haulme0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no manures (control) treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T8 (Castor cake @ 0.25 t/ha+Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB), reported higher potassium content in haulm”
e1“green gram at College Agronomy Farm”
e2“including no manures (control) treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic manure treatments had nonsignificant responses for early plant population, height and branch number.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae1
- Treatment
- organic manures treatmentse0
- Outcome
- initial plant population, plant height and number of branches per plant at 30 DASe0
- Comparator
- no manures (control) treatmente2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Response of organic manures treatments found non-significant in case of initial plant population, plant height and number of branches per plant at 30 DAS”
e1“green gram at College Agronomy Farm”
e2“including no manures (control) treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic manure treatments had nonsignificant responses for protein and seed, haulm and soil micronutrient content, except seed Mn.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae1
- Treatment
- organic manures treatmentse0
- Outcome
- protein content, micronutrient content in seed, haulm and soile0
- Qualifier
- except Mn in seede0
- Comparator
- no manures (control) treatmente2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Response of organic manures treatments found non-significant in case of initial plant population, plant height and number of branches per plant at 30 DAS, protein content, micronutrient content in seed, haulm and soil, except Mn in seed”
e1“green gram at College Agronomy Farm”
e2“including no manures (control) treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic manure treatments had nonsignificant responses for heavy metals in seed, haulm and soil.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae1
- Treatment
- organic manures treatmentse0
- Outcome
- heavy metal content in seed, haulm and soile0
- Comparator
- no manures (control) treatmente2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Response of organic manures treatments found non-significant in case of initial plant population, plant height and number of branches per plant at 30 DAS, protein content, micronutrient content in seed, haulm and soil, except Mn in seed, heavy metal content in seed, haulm and soil”
e1“green gram at College Agronomy Farm”
e2“including no manures (control) treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic manure treatments had nonsignificant responses for soil EC, organic carbon and available K2O after harvest.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae2
- Treatment
- organic manures treatmentse1
- Outcome
- after harvest soil nutrient EC, organic carbon and available K2Oe0
- Comparator
- no manures (control) treatmente3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after harvest soil nutrient EC, organic carbon and available K2O”
e1“Response of organic manures treatments found non-significant”
e2“green gram at College Agronomy Farm”
e3“including no manures (control) treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient content in seed and haulm also showed nonsignificant responses.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae2
- Treatment
- organic manures treatmentse1
- Outcome
- nutrient content in seed and haulme0
- Comparator
- no manures (control) treatmente3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“same results also observed in case of nutrient content in seed and haulm”
e1“Response of organic manures treatments found non-significant”
e2“green gram at College Agronomy Farm”
e3“including no manures (control) treatment”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
119 papers more in this group
See all 123 papers →Rhizobium · soil: biology · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Rhizobium · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
28 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.