Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Production Potential of Summer Greengram [Vigna radiata (L) wilczek] to Different Nutrient Management Practices under South Gujarat Condition

V. M. Patel; K. A. Shah; Prabhu Nayaka

12
claims
40
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during summer season of 2018 at the college farm, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari to study the “Production potential of summer greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] to different nutrient management practices under south Gujarat condition”. The soil of the experimental field was clayey in texture having medium to poor drainage, low in available nitrogen and organic carbon and medium in available phosphorus and available potassium. Total seven treatments viz., Control (T1), FYM @ 2.5 t/ha + 100% RDF (T2), FYM @ 5 t/ha + 50% RDF (T3), FYM @ 2.5 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage (T4), vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 100% RDF (T5), vermicompost @ 2 t/ha + 50% RDF (T6) and vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage (T7) were tested in randomized block design with four replications. Most of the growth and yield attributes viz., plant population at harvest, plant height at 60 DAS, test weight and harvest index did not affected significantly by different nutrient management treatments. An application of vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage (T7) recorded significantly higher plant height (47.41 cm) at harvest, number of branches per plant (4.30), dry matter production per plant (10.71 g), number of pod per plant (32.75), number of seed per pod (9.30), seed yield (1390 kg/ha) and haulm yield (1751 kg/ha) over control. Similarly, the maximum gross realization Rs 95594/ha, net realization Rs 63645/ha and the BCR value of 2.99 were observed with the application of vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant population at harvest and plant height at 60 DAS of greengram were not significantly affected by the different nutrient management treatments.

Treatment
different nutrient management treatmentse1
Outcome
plant population at harvest, plant height at 60 DASe1
Direction
did not affected significantlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant population at harvest, plant height at 60 DAS, test weight and harvest index did not affected significantly by different nutrient management treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Test weight and harvest index of greengram were not significantly affected by the different nutrient management treatments.

Treatment
different nutrient management treatmentse1
Outcome
test weight and harvest indexe1
Direction
did not affected significantlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant population at harvest, plant height at 60 DAS, test weight and harvest index did not affected significantly by different nutrient management treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T7 (vermicompost 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + banana pseudostem sap spray) gave significantly higher plant height at harvest (47.41 cm) than the control in greengram.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stagee1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
highere1
Value
47.41 cme2
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage (T7) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1381 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant height (47.41 cm) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1416 · show in text ↑
e3

“over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave significantly more branches per plant (4.30) than the control in greengram.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stagee1
Outcome
number of branches per plante2
Direction
highere1
Value
4.30e2
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage (T7) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1381 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of branches per plant (4.30)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1453 · show in text ↑
e3

“over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave significantly higher dry matter production per plant (10.71 g) than the control in greengram.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stagee1
Outcome
dry matter production per plante2
Direction
highere1
Value
10.71 ge2
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage (T7) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1381 · show in text ↑
e2

“dry matter production per plant (10.71 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1496 · show in text ↑
e3

“over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave significantly more pods per plant (32.75) than the control in greengram.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stagee1
Outcome
number of pod per plante2
Direction
highere1
Value
32.75e2
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage (T7) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1381 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of pod per plant (32.75)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1529 · show in text ↑
e3

“over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave significantly more seeds per pod (9.30) than the control in greengram.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stagee1
Outcome
number of seed per pode2
Direction
highere1
Value
9.30e2
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage (T7) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1381 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of seed per pod (9.30)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1560 · show in text ↑
e3

“over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave significantly higher seed yield (1390 kg/ha) than the control in greengram.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stagee1
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
highere1
Value
1390 kg/hae2
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage (T7) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1381 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed yield (1390 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1585 · show in text ↑
e3

“over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave significantly higher haulm yield (1751 kg/ha) than the control in greengram.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stagee1
Outcome
haulm yielde2
Direction
highere1
Value
1751 kg/hae2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage (T7) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1381 · show in text ↑
e2

“haulm yield (1751 kg/ha) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave the maximum gross realization (Rs 95594/ha) in greengram.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stagee1
Outcome
gross realizatione2
Direction
maximume2
Value
Rs 95594/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“observed with the application of vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1906 · show in text ↑
e2

“maximum gross realization Rs 95594/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave the maximum net realization (Rs 63645/ha) in greengram.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stagee1
Outcome
net realizatione2
Direction
maximume2
Value
Rs 63645/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“observed with the application of vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1906 · show in text ↑
e2

“maximum gross realization Rs 95594/ha, net realization Rs 63645/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (BCR 2.99) in greengram.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stagee1
Outcome
BCR valuee2
Direction
maximume2
Value
2.99e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“observed with the application of vermicompost @ 1 t/ha + 50% RDF + spraying of enrich banana psuedostem sap @ 10 ml/l of water at branching and 50 % flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1906 · show in text ↑
e2

“maximum gross realization Rs 95594/ha, net realization Rs 63645/ha and the BCR value of 2.99”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1736 · show in text ↑

stage · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

stage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 22 positive, 8 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 40 positive, 1 negative or no effect

40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.