Paper · 2008 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Influence of biofertilizers, foliar application of dap and sulphur sources on yield and yield attributes of summer green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)

Mainak Ghosh; S. Joseph

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment conducted during summer season of 2005 at Crop Research Farm in Allahabad Agricultural Institute - Deemed University, Allahabad with ‘Type 44’ green gram variety showed that dual inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB, application of sulphur @ 30 kg/ha through gypsum and 2% foliar application of DAP, significantly recorded higher number of pods/plant, fertility co-efficient, number of seeds/pod, seed yield, stover yield and test weight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly increased pod number, fertility coefficient and seeds per pod.

Material
green gramt0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB, application of sulphur @ 30 kg/ha through gypsum and 2% foliar application of DAPe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
number of pods/plant, fertility co-efficient, number of seeds/pode0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB, application of sulphur @ 30 kg/ha through gypsum and 2% foliar application of DAP, significantly recorded higher number of pods/plant, fertility co-efficient, number of seeds/pod, seed yield, stover yield and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly increased seed and stover yield and test weight.

Treatment
dual inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB, application of sulphur @ 30 kg/ha through gypsum and 2% foliar application of DAPe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
seed yield, stover yield and test weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB, application of sulphur @ 30 kg/ha through gypsum and 2% foliar application of DAP, significantly recorded higher number of pods/plant, fertility co-efficient, number of seeds/pod, seed yield, stover yield and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–152 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Rhizobium · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

lime · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.