Paper · 2024 · Microorganisms

Bacterial Lipopeptides Are Effective against Pear Fire Blight

Ihsan ud Din; Lina Hu; Yuan Jiang; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fire blight, a devastating disease caused by Erwinia amylovora, poses a significant threat to pear and apple trees in Xinjiang province, China. In an effort to combat this pathogen, we isolated 10 bacteria from various components of apple and crabapple trees and conducted screenings to assess their ability to inhibit E. amylovora in vitro. Through biochemical tests and partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we identified two promising strains, Priestia megaterium strain H1 and Bacillus subtilis strain I2. These strains were then evaluated for their efficacy in biocontrol under controlled laboratory conditions, focusing on immature fruits and leaves. Remarkably, all selected antagonists exhibited the capability to reduce the severity of the disease on both fruit and leaves. P. megaterium strain H1 and B. subtilis strain I2 exhibited significant reductions in disease incidence on both immature fruits and leaves compared to the control. Specifically, on immature fruits, they achieved reductions of 53.39% and 44.76%, respectively, while on leaves, they demonstrated reductions of 59.55% and 55.53%, respectively. Furthermore, during the study, we detected the presence of lipopeptides, including surfactin, iturins, bacillomycin D, and fengycins, in the methanol extract obtained from these two antagonistic bacteria using thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Based on the results obtained, B. subtilis strain I2 and P. megaterium strain H1 exhibit considerable potential for controlling fire blight. However, further evaluation of their efficacy under natural field conditions is essential to validate their practicality as a biocontrol method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two bacterial strains were identified as promising antagonists of E. amylovora.

Taxon
pear and apple treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Interactor
Priestia megaterium strain H1Priestia megateriume0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilis strain I2Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
two promising strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Through biochemical tests and partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we identified two promising strains, Priestia megaterium strain H1 and Bacillus subtilis strain I2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear and apple trees in Xinjiang province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected antagonists reduced fire blight severity on fruit and leaves.

Taxon
pear and apple treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Organ / stage
fruit and leavese0
Treatment
selected antagonistse0
Outcome
severity of the diseasee0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all selected antagonists exhibited the capability to reduce the severity of the disease on both fruit and leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear and apple trees in Xinjiang province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. megaterium H1 reduced disease incidence on immature fruit by 53.39% versus control.

Taxon
pear and apple treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Organ / stage
immature fruitse0
Treatment
P. megaterium strain H1e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
53.39%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. megaterium strain H1 and B. subtilis strain I2 exhibited significant reductions in disease incidence on both immature fruits and leaves compared to the control. Specifically, on immature fruits, they achieved reductions of 53.39% and 44.76%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear and apple trees in Xinjiang province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis I2 reduced disease incidence on immature fruit by 44.76% versus control.

Taxon
pear and apple treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Organ / stage
immature fruitse0
Treatment
B. subtilis strain I2e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
44.76%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. megaterium strain H1 and B. subtilis strain I2 exhibited significant reductions in disease incidence on both immature fruits and leaves compared to the control. Specifically, on immature fruits, they achieved reductions of 53.39% and 44.76%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear and apple trees in Xinjiang province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. megaterium H1 reduced disease incidence on leaves by 59.55% versus control.

Taxon
pear and apple treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
P. megaterium strain H1e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
59.55%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. megaterium strain H1 and B. subtilis strain I2 exhibited significant reductions in disease incidence on both immature fruits and leaves compared to the control. Specifically, on immature fruits, they achieved reductions of 53.39% and 44.76%, respectively, while on leaves, they demonstrated reductions of 59.55% and 55.53%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear and apple trees in Xinjiang province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis I2 reduced disease incidence on leaves by 55.53% versus control.

Taxon
pear and apple treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
B. subtilis strain I2e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
55.53%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. megaterium strain H1 and B. subtilis strain I2 exhibited significant reductions in disease incidence on both immature fruits and leaves compared to the control. Specifically, on immature fruits, they achieved reductions of 53.39% and 44.76%, respectively, while on leaves, they demonstrated reductions of 59.55% and 55.53%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear and apple trees in Xinjiang province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surfactin, iturins, bacillomycin D and fengycins were detected in extracts of the antagonists.

Taxon
pear and apple treesMalus domesticaPyrus communist0
Interactor
two antagonistic bacteriae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
presence of lipopeptidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we detected the presence of lipopeptides, including surfactin, iturins, bacillomycin D, and fengycins, in the methanol extract obtained from these two antagonistic bacteria using thin-layer chromatography (TLC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear and apple trees in Xinjiang province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–142 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.