Paper · 2022 · Journal of Crop Improvement

Antagonistic effect of Leuconostoc mesenteroides on grapevine crown gall and fire blight

Miloud Sabri; Khaoula Habbadi; El Hassan Achbani; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grapevine crown gall, caused by Allorhizobium vitis (A. vitis) and fire blight, caused by Erwinia amylovora (E. amylovora) of rosaceous plants, have been recognized as serious bacterial diseases and responsible for major crop losses in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), pear (Pyrus communis L.) and apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) worldwide. To develop an effective biocontrol method against the two bacterial pathogens, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from agricultural irrigation canals were tested as biocontrol agents. Thirty-two bacterial isolates were screened for their in vitro antagonistic activity. Four isolates (MS-1, MS-2, MS-3, and MS-4), identified by partial sequencing of 16S rRNA as Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. Jonggajibkimchii, were found to significantly inhibit the growth of A. vitis and E. amylovora in vitro. The biocontrol efficiency of these strains was tested against E. amylovora on immature pear fruits under laboratory conditions, and against A. vitis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and kalanchoe (Kalanchoe daigremontiana) plants, under greenhouse conditions. Results showed that all selected antagonists were able to suppress fire blight disease on immature pear fruits. On tomato plants, the MS-1 and MS-2 strains were able to reduce the A. vitis infection by 82% and 99%, respectively. Similarly, the MS-2 strain reduced gall formation on kalanchoe plants by 99%. We concluded that Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. Jonggajibkimchii strains could serve as a potential biocontrol agent against fire blight and grapevine crown gall diseases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four Leuconostoc isolates significantly inhibited A. vitis in vitro.

Interactor
A. vitise0pathogen
Second interactor
Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. JonggajibkimchiiLeuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. jonggajibkimchiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of A. vitise0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. jonggajibkimchii
Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. jonggajibkimchii · Second interactorAjay Kumar Chaurasiya · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four isolates (MS-1, MS-2, MS-3, and MS-4), identified by partial sequencing of 16S rRNA as Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. Jonggajibkimchii, were found to significantly inhibit the growth of A. vitis and E. amylovora in vitro.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–837 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four Leuconostoc isolates significantly inhibited E. amylovora in vitro.

Interactor
E. amylovoraErwinia amylovorae0pathogen
Second interactor
Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. JonggajibkimchiiLeuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. jonggajibkimchiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
E. amylovorae0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. jonggajibkimchii
Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. jonggajibkimchii · Second interactorAjay Kumar Chaurasiya · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four isolates (MS-1, MS-2, MS-3, and MS-4), identified by partial sequencing of 16S rRNA as Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. Jonggajibkimchii, were found to significantly inhibit the growth of A. vitis and E. amylovora in vitro.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected antagonists suppressed fire blight on immature pear fruits.

Organ / stage
immature pear fruitse0
Treatment
all selected antagonistse0
Outcome
fire blight diseasee0
Direction
suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that all selected antagonists were able to suppress fire blight disease on immature pear fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS-1 reduced A. vitis infection on tomato plants by 82%.

Treatment
MS-1e0
Interactor
A. vitise0pathogen
Outcome
A. vitis infectione0
Direction
reducee0
Value
82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On tomato plants, the MS-1 and MS-2 strains were able to reduce the A. vitis infection by 82% and 99%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS-2 reduced A. vitis infection on tomato plants by 99%.

Treatment
MS-2e0
Interactor
A. vitise0pathogen
Outcome
A. vitis infectione0
Direction
reducee0
Value
99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On tomato plants, the MS-1 and MS-2 strains were able to reduce the A. vitis infection by 82% and 99%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS-2 reduced gall formation on kalanchoe plants by 99%.

Taxon
kalanchoeKalanchoee0
Treatment
MS-2e0
Outcome
gall formatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Kalanchoe
Kalanchoe · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Stan Shebs · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, the MS-2 strain reduced gall formation on kalanchoe plants by 99%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1407 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · disease · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.