Paper · 2019 · Plant Disease

Management of Fire Blight Using Pre-bloom Application of Prohexadione-Calcium

Anna E. Wallis; Kerik D. Cox

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
25
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fire blight, a bacterial disease of rosaceous plants caused by Erwinia amylovora, is one of the most important diseases affecting commercial apple production worldwide. Antibiotics, applied at bloom to protect against blossom infection, are the most effective means of management but raise concern due to the potential for antibiotic resistance in both the pathogen population and nontarget organisms. In addition, most fire blight outbreaks in New York State often emerge in late June to July as shoot blight, calling into question the role of blossom infections and the antibiotic applications made to manage them. Prohexadione-calcium (PhCa) is a gibberellic acid inhibitor used post-bloom to control shoot vigor and to manage shoot blight. However, the magnitude of shoot blight management is directly related to the suppression of shoot growth, which is undesirable, especially in young orchards during establishment years. PhCa is believed to control shoot blight by thickening cell walls in cortical parenchyma, preventing invasion of host tissues by E. amylovora. We hypothesize that PhCa applied pre-bloom could similarly prevent invasion of blossom pedicels following infection, leading to reduced disease incidence. We evaluated novel pre-bloom PhCa programs for their effects on disease management (blossom and shoot blight) as well as their impact on shoot growth for three years in a mature ‘Gala’ orchard in New York. In all three years of the study, all PhCa programs resulted in less than 27% incidence (71% control) of blossom blight and less than 13% incidence (77% control) of shoot blight with minimal effect on tree growth. Inclusion of a biopesticide during bloom further reduced the incidence of blossom blight in one year of three. Using light microscopy, we found that cell walls in the cortical parenchyma of fruitlet pedicels on trees receiving pre-bloom PhCa applications were significantly thicker than those of untreated trees 40 days after full bloom and inoculation. Overall, we found that pre-bloom applications of PhCa had utility in reducing blossom blight and shoot blight with minimal impacts on tree growth. These pre-bloom programs would fit with standard production practices and may contribute toward the development of fire blight management programs without the use of antibiotics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All PhCa programs kept blossom blight incidence under 27% with 71% control across three years.

Treatment
all PhCa programse0
Outcome
incidence (71% control) of blossom blighte0
Direction
less thane0
Value
less than 27%e0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all three years of the study, all PhCa programs resulted in less than 27% incidence (71% control) of blossom blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1551 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial apple production worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All PhCa programs kept shoot blight incidence under 13% with 77% control across three years.

Treatment
all PhCa programse0
Outcome
incidence (77% control) of shoot blighte0
Direction
less thane0
Value
less than 13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all three years of the study, all PhCa programs resulted in less than 27% incidence (71% control) of blossom blight and less than 13% incidence (77% control) of shoot blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1609 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial apple production worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PhCa programs had minimal effect on apple tree growth.

Treatment
all PhCa programse1
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
minimal effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with minimal effect on tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1644 · show in text ↑
e1

“all PhCa programs resulted in less than 27% incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1519 · show in text ↑
e2

“commercial apple production worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A bloom biopesticide further reduced blossom blight incidence in one of three years.

Treatment
Inclusion of a biopesticide during bloome0
Outcome
incidence of blossom blighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in one year of threee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inclusion of a biopesticide during bloom further reduced the incidence of blossom blight in one year of three.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1756 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial apple production worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-bloom PhCa significantly thickened fruitlet pedicel cortical parenchyma cell walls versus untreated trees 40 days after bloom and inoculation.

Treatment
pre-bloom PhCa applicationse0
Outcome
cell walls in the cortical parenchyma of fruitlet pedicelse0
Direction
thickere0
Qualifier
40 days after full bloom and inoculatione0
Comparator
untreated treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cell walls in the cortical parenchyma of fruitlet pedicels on trees receiving pre-bloom PhCa applications were significantly thicker than those of untreated trees 40 days after full bloom and inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1998 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial apple production worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–167 · show in text ↑

prohexadione-calcium · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

prohexadione-calcium · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.