Paper · 1999 · HortScience

Strategy for Combining Heat Treatment, Calcium Infiltration, and Biological Control to Reduce Postharvest Decay of `Gala' Apples

William S. Conway; Wojciech J. Janisiewicz; Joshua D. Klein; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
89
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The viability of Penicillium expansum Link conidia in sporulating culture declined rapidly when exposed to 38 °C, and when conidia were exposed to 38 °C prior to inoculation of apple fruits ( Malus × domestica Borkh.), the resulting lesions were smaller than those on fruit inoculated with nonheated conidia. `Gala' apples were heated after harvest (38 °C for 4 days), pressure infiltrated with a 2% solution of CaCl 2 , or treated with the antagonist Pseudomonas syringae van Hall, alone or in combinations to reduce postharvest decay caused by Penicillium expansum . After up to 6 months in storage at 1 °C, no decay lesions developed on fruit that were heated after inoculation with P. expansum , or any combination of P. expansum , antagonist, or Ca. Parallel lots of heat-treated and nonheated fruit that were either infiltrated or not infiltrated with Ca were stored up to 6 months. They were then inoculated with P. expansum alone, or with the antagonist followed by P. expansum . Prior heat treatment did not influence lesion size. Calcium alone, the antagonist alone, and heat plus Ca all reduced the incidence of decay by ≈25%, whereas heat plus the antagonist reduced it by 70%. Calcium plus the antagonist or Ca plus the antagonist and heat reduced decay incidence by 89% and 91%, respectively. The integrated strategy of heat-treating fruit, followed by Ca infiltration and then treatment with an antagonist, may be a useful alternative to controlling postharvest decay with fungicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium conidial viability declined rapidly at 38 °C.

Treatment
exposed to 38 °Ce0
Interactor
Penicillium expansum LinkPenicillium expansume0pathogen
Outcome
viability of Penicillium expansum Link conidiae0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The viability of Penicillium expansum Link conidia in sporulating culture declined rapidly when exposed to 38 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preheating Penicillium conidia before apple inoculation produced smaller lesions than nonheated conidia.

Treatment
conidia were exposed to 38 °Ce0
Outcome
lesionse0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
nonheated conidiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when conidia were exposed to 38 °C prior to inoculation of apple fruits ( Malus × domestica Borkh.), the resulting lesions were smaller than those on fruit inoculated with nonheated conidia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-inoculation heat treatment prevented decay lesions during storage.

Treatment
heated after inoculation with P. expansume0
Interactor
P. expansumPenicillium expansume0pathogen
Outcome
no decay lesionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After up to 6 months in storage at 1 °C, no decay lesions developed on fruit that were heated after inoculation with P. expansum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior heat treatment did not influence lesion size after storage.

Treatment
Prior heat treatmente0
Outcome
lesion sizee0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prior heat treatment did not influence lesion size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium alone reduced decay incidence by about 25%.

Treatment
Calcium alonee0
Outcome
incidence of decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
≈25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium alone, the antagonist alone, and heat plus Ca all reduced the incidence of decay by ≈25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonist alone reduced decay incidence by about 25%.

Treatment
the antagonist alonee0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae van HallPseudomonas syringaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
≈25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium alone, the antagonist alone, and heat plus Ca all reduced the incidence of decay by ≈25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1136 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas syringae van Hall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat plus calcium reduced decay incidence by about 25%.

Treatment
heat plus Cae0
Outcome
incidence of decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
≈25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium alone, the antagonist alone, and heat plus Ca all reduced the incidence of decay by ≈25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat plus antagonist reduced decay incidence by 70%.

Treatment
heat plus the antagoniste0
Outcome
ite0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat plus the antagonist reduced it by 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium plus antagonist reduced decay incidence by 89%.

Treatment
Calcium plus the antagoniste0
Outcome
decay incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
89%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium plus the antagonist or Ca plus the antagonist and heat reduced decay incidence by 89% and 91%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium plus antagonist and heat reduced decay incidence by 91%.

Treatment
Ca plus the antagonist and heate0
Outcome
decay incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
91%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium plus the antagonist or Ca plus the antagonist and heat reduced decay incidence by 89% and 91%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose heat treatment, calcium infiltration and antagonist treatment as a postharvest decay control option.

Outcome
heat-treating fruit, followed by Ca infiltration and then treatment with an antagoniste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integrated strategy of heat-treating fruit, followed by Ca infiltration and then treatment with an antagonist, may be a useful alternative to controlling postharvest decay with fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

39 papers: 28 positive, 11 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Penicillium expansum · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

heat · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

inoculation · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 23 positive, 40 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.