Paper · 2009 · Phytopathology

Implications of Pathogenesis by Erwinia amylovora on Rosaceous Stigmas to Biological Control of Fire Blight

K. B. Johnson; T. L. Sawyer; V. O. Stockwell; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
34
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

As a prerequisite to infection of flowers, Erwinia amylovora grows epiphytically on stigmas, which provide a conducive habitat for bacterial growth. Stigmas also support growth of several other bacterial genera, which allows for biological control of fire blight; although, in practice, it is very difficult to exclude E. amylovora completely from this habitat. We investigated the dynamics of growth suppression of E. amylovora by comparing the ability of virulent and avirulent strains of E. amylovora to compete with each other on stigmas of pear, apple, and blackberry, and to compete with a co-inoculated mixture of effective bacterial antagonists. When strains were inoculated individually, virulent E. amylovora strain Ea153N attained the highest population size on stigmas, with population sizes that were approximately double those of an avirulent hrpL mutant of Ea153 or the bacterial antagonists. In competition experiments, growth of the avirulent derivative was suppressed by the antagonist mixture to a greater extent than the virulent strain. Unexpectedly, the virulent strain enhanced the population size of the antagonist mixture. Similarly, a small dose of virulent Ea153N added to inoculum of an avirulent hrpL mutant of Ea153 significantly increased the population size of the avirulent strain. A pathogenesis-gene reporter strain, Ea153 dspE::gfp, was applied to flowers and a subset of the population expressed the green fluorescent protein while growing epiphytically on stigmas of apple. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that virulent E. amylovora modifies the epiphytic habitat presented by the stigma through a pathogenesis-related process, which increases host resources available to itself and, coincidentally, to nonpathogenic competitors. Over nine orchard trials, avirulent Ea153 hrpL significantly suppressed the incidence of fire blight four times compared with six for the antagonist mixture. The degree of biological control achievable with an avirulent strain of E. amylovora likely is limited by its inability to utilize the stigmatic habitat to the same degree as a virulent strain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individually inoculated virulent Ea153N reached about twice the stigma population of avirulent Ea153 hrpL or bacterial antagonists.

Taxon
Rosaceoust0
Material
Ea153Ne0
Interactor
E. amylovoraErwinia amylovorae0pathogen
Outcome
population size on stigmase0
Direction
higheste0
Value
approximately doublee0
Comparator
an avirulent hrpL mutant of Ea153 or the bacterial antagonistse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When strains were inoculated individually, virulent E. amylovora strain Ea153N attained the highest population size on stigmas, with population sizes that were approximately double those of an avirulent hrpL mutant of Ea153 or the bacterial antagonists.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosaceous Stigmas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonist mixture suppressed the avirulent derivative more than the virulent strain.

Taxon
pear, apple, and blackberryMalus domesticaPyrus communisRubuse1
Treatment
antagonist mixturee0
Interactor
avirulent derivativee0pathogen
Outcome
growth of the avirulent derivativee0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
virulent straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of the avirulent derivative was suppressed by the antagonist mixture to a greater extent than the virulent strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1056 · show in text ↑
e1

“stigmas of pear, apple, and blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The virulent strain increased the antagonist mixture population.

Taxon
pear, apple, and blackberryMalus domesticaPyrus communisRubuse1
Treatment
virulent straine0
Interactor
antagonist mixturee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population size of the antagonist mixturee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the virulent strain enhanced the population size of the antagonist mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“stigmas of pear, apple, and blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding a small dose of virulent Ea153N significantly increased the avirulent mutant population.

Taxon
pear, apple, and blackberryMalus domesticaPyrus communisRubuse1
Treatment
a small dose of virulent Ea153Ne0
Interactor
avirulent hrpL mutant of Ea153e0pathogen
Outcome
population size of the avirulent straine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a small dose of virulent Ea153N added to inoculum of an avirulent hrpL mutant of Ea153 significantly increased the population size of the avirulent strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1313 · show in text ↑
e1

“stigmas of pear, apple, and blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–572 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A subset of the reporter strain population expressed green fluorescent protein on apple stigmas.

Material
Ea153 dspE::gfpe1
Organ / stage
stigmase0
Interactor
Ea153 dspE::gfpe1pathogen
Outcome
expressed the green fluorescent proteine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a subset of the population expressed the green fluorescent protein while growing epiphytically on stigmas of apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1510 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ea153 dspE::gfp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Avirulent Ea153 hrpL suppressed fire blight incidence in four of nine orchard trials.

Taxon
pear, apple, and blackberryMalus domesticaPyrus communisRubuse1
Treatment
avirulent Ea153 hrpLe0
Interactor
Ea153 hrpLe0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of fire blighte0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
four timese0
Comparator
antagonist mixturee0
Setting
orchard trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over nine orchard trials, avirulent Ea153 hrpL significantly suppressed the incidence of fire blight four times compared with six for the antagonist mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1941 · show in text ↑
e1

“stigmas of pear, apple, and blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonist mixture suppressed fire blight in six of nine orchard trials.

Taxon
pear, apple, and blackberryMalus domesticaPyrus communisRubuse1
Treatment
antagonist mixturee0
Interactor
antagonist mixturee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of fire blighte0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
sixe0
Setting
orchard trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over nine orchard trials, avirulent Ea153 hrpL significantly suppressed the incidence of fire blight four times compared with six for the antagonist mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1941 · show in text ↑
e1

“stigmas of pear, apple, and blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–572 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer virulent E. amylovora alters the stigma habitat via pathogenesis and increases host resources available to competitors.

Taxon
pear, apple, and blackberryMalus domesticaPyrus communisRubuse1
Interactor
E. amylovoraErwinia amylovorae0pathogen
Outcome
host resources available to itself and, coincidentally, to nonpathogenic competitorse0
Qualifier
pathogenesis-related processe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“virulent E. amylovora modifies the epiphytic habitat presented by the stigma through a pathogenesis-related process, which increases host resources available to itself and, coincidentally, to nonpathogenic competitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1783 · show in text ↑
e1

“stigmas of pear, apple, and blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–572 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude avirulent E. amylovora has limited biological control because it uses the stigma habitat less effectively than virulent strains.

Taxon
pear, apple, and blackberryMalus domesticaPyrus communisRubuse1
Interactor
E. amylovoraErwinia amylovorae0pathogen
Outcome
degree of biological controle0
Qualifier
inability to utilize the stigmatic habitat to the same degree as a virulent straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degree of biological control achievable with an avirulent strain of E. amylovora likely is limited by its inability to utilize the stigmatic habitat to the same degree as a virulent strain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1943–2136 · show in text ↑
e1

“stigmas of pear, apple, and blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–572 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.