Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Advantage of maize (Zea mays)-based intercropping system to different nutrient- management practices

BINOY CHHETRI; A.C. SINHA

18
claims
33
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during (pre-kharif) (FebruaryMay) seasons of 2014 and 2015 at the Instruc- tional Farm, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, to evaluate the effect of maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea [Vigna unguiculata L.) and nutrient-management practices on yield attributes, yield, nutrient uptake and competition indices. Among the cropping system, sole crop resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,913 kg/ha), stover yield (6,565 kg/ha), harvest index (37.21%), uptake of nitrogen (101.36 kg/ha), phosphorus (19.80 kg/ha) and potassium (110.90 kg/ha). However, growing of maize as an intercrop with cowpea in a 2 : 2 row ratio resulted in the highest grain yield (3,249 kg/ha), stover yield (5,707 kg/ha) and harvest index (36.19%) than 2 : 4 row ratio combination. Among the nutrient-management practices, 75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/ha resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,684 kg/ha), stover yield (6,207 kg/ha), harvest index (37.14%) and NPK uptake. However, productivity system in terms of maize-equivalent yield (MEY), land-equivalent ratio (LER), relative crowding coeffi- cient (RCC), competition index (CI), aggressivity, competition ratio (CR), land-equivalent coefficient (LEC), area time-equivalent ratio (ATER) and monetary advantage was found to be higher in 2 : 2 row ratio, followed by 2 : 4 row ratio combination. Thus, maize intercrop with cowpea in 2 : 2 row ratio combination and supplied with 75% RDF + PSB + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/ha (N ) improved the productivity of sole crop as well as 3 intercrop system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize yielded more grain (3,913 kg/ha) than maize intercropped with cowpea

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
sole crope1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3,913 kg/hae1
Comparator
intercropped with cowpeae2
Setting
Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengale3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sole crop resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,913 kg/ha), stover yield (6,565 kg/ha), harvest index (37.21%), uptake of nitrogen (101.36 kg/ha), phosphorus (19.80 kg/ha) and potassium (110.90 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–601 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
e3

“Instruc- tional Farm, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had the highest stover yield (6,565 kg/ha) among cropping systems

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
sole crope1
Outcome
stover yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
6,565 kg/hae1
Comparator
intercropped with cowpeae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sole crop resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,913 kg/ha), stover yield (6,565 kg/ha), harvest index (37.21%), uptake of nitrogen (101.36 kg/ha), phosphorus (19.80 kg/ha) and potassium (110.90 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–601 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had the highest harvest index (37.21%) among cropping systems

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
sole crope1
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
37.21%e1
Comparator
intercropped with cowpeae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sole crop resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,913 kg/ha), stover yield (6,565 kg/ha), harvest index (37.21%), uptake of nitrogen (101.36 kg/ha), phosphorus (19.80 kg/ha) and potassium (110.90 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–601 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had the highest nitrogen uptake (101.36 kg/ha) among cropping systems

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
sole crope1
Outcome
uptake of nitrogene1
Direction
higheste1
Value
101.36 kg/hae1
Comparator
intercropped with cowpeae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sole crop resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,913 kg/ha), stover yield (6,565 kg/ha), harvest index (37.21%), uptake of nitrogen (101.36 kg/ha), phosphorus (19.80 kg/ha) and potassium (110.90 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–601 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had the highest phosphorus uptake (19.80 kg/ha) among cropping systems

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
sole crope1
Outcome
phosphoruse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
19.80 kg/hae1
Comparator
intercropped with cowpeae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sole crop resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,913 kg/ha), stover yield (6,565 kg/ha), harvest index (37.21%), uptake of nitrogen (101.36 kg/ha), phosphorus (19.80 kg/ha) and potassium (110.90 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–601 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had the highest potassium uptake (110.90 kg/ha) among cropping systems

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
sole crope1
Outcome
potassiume1
Direction
higheste1
Value
110.90 kg/hae1
Comparator
intercropped with cowpeae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sole crop resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,913 kg/ha), stover yield (6,565 kg/ha), harvest index (37.21%), uptake of nitrogen (101.36 kg/ha), phosphorus (19.80 kg/ha) and potassium (110.90 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–601 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize intercropped with cowpea in a 2 : 2 row ratio had higher grain yield (3,249 kg/ha) than the 2 : 4 row ratio

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
intercrop with cowpea in a 2 : 2 row ratioe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3,249 kg/hae1
Comparator
2 : 4 row ratio combinatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“growing of maize as an intercrop with cowpea in a 2 : 2 row ratio resulted in the highest grain yield (3,249 kg/ha), stover yield (5,707 kg/ha) and harvest index (36.19%) than 2 : 4 row ratio combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–815 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize intercropped with cowpea in a 2 : 2 row ratio had higher stover yield (5,707 kg/ha) than the 2 : 4 row ratio

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
intercrop with cowpea in a 2 : 2 row ratioe1
Outcome
stover yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5,707 kg/hae1
Comparator
2 : 4 row ratio combinatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“growing of maize as an intercrop with cowpea in a 2 : 2 row ratio resulted in the highest grain yield (3,249 kg/ha), stover yield (5,707 kg/ha) and harvest index (36.19%) than 2 : 4 row ratio combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–815 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize intercropped with cowpea in a 2 : 2 row ratio had higher harvest index (36.19%) than the 2 : 4 row ratio

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
intercrop with cowpea in a 2 : 2 row ratioe1
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
36.19%e1
Comparator
2 : 4 row ratio combinatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“growing of maize as an intercrop with cowpea in a 2 : 2 row ratio resulted in the highest grain yield (3,249 kg/ha), stover yield (5,707 kg/ha) and harvest index (36.19%) than 2 : 4 row ratio combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–815 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize with 75% RDF plus PSB, Azotobacter and vermicompost had the highest grain yield (3,684 kg/ha) among nutrient-management practices

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/hae1
Interactor
phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3,684 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/ha resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,684 kg/ha), stover yield (6,207 kg/ha), harvest index (37.14%) and NPK uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1118 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize with the 75% RDF nutrient package had the highest stover yield (6,207 kg/ha) among nutrient-management practices

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/hae1
Interactor
phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
stover yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
6,207 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/ha resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,684 kg/ha), stover yield (6,207 kg/ha), harvest index (37.14%) and NPK uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1118 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize with the 75% RDF nutrient package had the highest harvest index (37.14%) among nutrient-management practices

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/hae1
Interactor
phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
37.14%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/ha resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,684 kg/ha), stover yield (6,207 kg/ha), harvest index (37.14%) and NPK uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1118 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize with the 75% RDF nutrient package had the highest NPK uptake among nutrient-management practices

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/hae1
Interactor
phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
NPK uptakee1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/ha resulted in the highest yield attributes, grain yield (3,684 kg/ha), stover yield (6,207 kg/ha), harvest index (37.14%) and NPK uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1118 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2 : 2 row ratio had higher maize-equivalent yield and land-equivalent ratio than the 2 : 4 row ratio

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
2 : 2 row ratioe1
Outcome
maize-equivalent yield (MEY), land-equivalent ratio (LER)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
2 : 4 row ratio combinatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“productivity system in terms of maize-equivalent yield (MEY), land-equivalent ratio (LER), relative crowding coeffi- cient (RCC), competition index (CI), aggressivity, competition ratio (CR), land-equivalent coefficient (LEC), area time-equivalent ratio (ATER) and monetary advantage was found to be higher in 2 : 2 row ratio, followed by 2 : 4 row ratio combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2 : 2 row ratio had higher relative crowding coefficient and competition index than the 2 : 4 row ratio

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
2 : 2 row ratioe1
Outcome
relative crowding coeffi- cient (RCC), competition index (CI)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
2 : 4 row ratio combinatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“productivity system in terms of maize-equivalent yield (MEY), land-equivalent ratio (LER), relative crowding coeffi- cient (RCC), competition index (CI), aggressivity, competition ratio (CR), land-equivalent coefficient (LEC), area time-equivalent ratio (ATER) and monetary advantage was found to be higher in 2 : 2 row ratio, followed by 2 : 4 row ratio combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2 : 2 row ratio had higher aggressivity and competition ratio than the 2 : 4 row ratio

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
2 : 2 row ratioe1
Outcome
aggressivity, competition ratio (CR)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
2 : 4 row ratio combinatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“productivity system in terms of maize-equivalent yield (MEY), land-equivalent ratio (LER), relative crowding coeffi- cient (RCC), competition index (CI), aggressivity, competition ratio (CR), land-equivalent coefficient (LEC), area time-equivalent ratio (ATER) and monetary advantage was found to be higher in 2 : 2 row ratio, followed by 2 : 4 row ratio combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2 : 2 row ratio had higher land-equivalent coefficient, area time-equivalent ratio and monetary advantage than the 2 : 4 row ratio

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
2 : 2 row ratioe1
Outcome
land-equivalent coefficient (LEC), area time-equivalent ratio (ATER) and monetary advantagee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
2 : 4 row ratio combinatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“productivity system in terms of maize-equivalent yield (MEY), land-equivalent ratio (LER), relative crowding coeffi- cient (RCC), competition index (CI), aggressivity, competition ratio (CR), land-equivalent coefficient (LEC), area time-equivalent ratio (ATER) and monetary advantage was found to be higher in 2 : 2 row ratio, followed by 2 : 4 row ratio combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2 : 2 maize-cowpea intercrop with 75% RDF plus PSB, Azotobacter and vermicompost improved productivity relative to sole maize

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
75% RDF + PSB + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/hae1
Interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
sole crope1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize intercrop with cowpea in 2 : 2 row ratio combination and supplied with 75% RDF + PSB + Azotobacter + vermicompost (VC) @ 5.0 t/ha (N ) improved the productivity of sole crop as well as 3 intercrop system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1712 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–228 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

244 papers: 190 positive, 54 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

240 papers more in this group

See all 244 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.