Paper · 1989 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

THE ROLE OF VA MYCORRHIZAE IN THE ABSORPTION OF P AND Zn BY MAIZE IN FIELD AND GROWTH CHAMBER EXPERIMENTS

S. LU; M. H. MILLER

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two years of field experiments and one growth chamber experiment were conducted to determine the role of VA mycorrhizae in P and Zn absorption as well as the P-Zn interaction. The pattern of development of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae (VAM) in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada was investigated. The field experiments consisted of three fertility treatments, recommended phosphorus (RP), high phosphorus (HP) and HP plus zinc (HPZn). The RP and HP soils were used in the growth chamber experiment and Zn fertilizer was added to both RP and HP soils to have treatments of RP, HP, RPZn and HPZn. Benomyl was used in the second year of the field experiment and in the growth chamber experiment to reduce mycorrhizal infection. In the field experiment in 1987, 20% of the roots were colonized by VAM in the RP soil just 3 wk after sowing. At 40 d after sowing, about 50% of roots were infected. The HP treatment significantly reduced VAM infection intensity compared to the RP treatment. The addition of 40 kg Zn ha −1 to the HP soil had little effect on mycorrhizal infection intensity in either field or growth chamber experiments. However, Zn fertilization increased mycorrhizal infection in the RP treatment in the growth chamber experiment. Treatment with benomyl significantly decreased mycorrhizal infection, shoot dry weight, P concentration and P inflow in the RP soil, suggesting the fungal relationship is important for P absorption in this soil. There was no conclusive evidence that mycorrhizae are important for P absorption in the HP soil. Although HP treatment decreased VAM infection greatly in both field and growth chamber experiments, it did not affect the absorption of Zn. Benomyl did not affect the shoot Zn concentration in either field or growth chamber experiments, suggesting that mycorrhizae are not important in the absorption of Zn on this soil. Key words: VAM infection development, maize, P, Zn, benomyl

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In field trials in 1987, 20% of maize roots were colonized by VAM in the RP soil 3 weeks after sowing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
RP soile1
Interactor
VAMe1symbiont
Outcome
colonized by VAMe1
Value
20%e1
Setting
In the field experiment in 1987e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the field experiment in 1987, 20% of the roots were colonized by VAM in the RP soil just 3 wk after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–885 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40 days after sowing, about 50% of maize roots were infected by VAM.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
rootse2
Outcome
infectede2
Value
about 50%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e2

“At 40 d after sowing, about 50% of roots were infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The HP treatment significantly reduced VAM infection intensity in maize compared with the RP treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
HP treatmente3
Interactor
VAMe3symbiont
Outcome
VAM infection intensitye3
Direction
reducede3
Comparator
RP treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e3

“The HP treatment significantly reduced VAM infection intensity compared to the RP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 40 kg Zn per ha to the HP soil had little effect on mycorrhizal infection intensity in field or growth-chamber experiments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
The addition of 40 kg Zn ha −1 to the HP soile4
Interactor
mycorrhizale4symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal infection intensitye4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Setting
field or growth chamber experimentse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e4

“The addition of 40 kg Zn ha −1 to the HP soil had little effect on mycorrhizal infection intensity in either field or growth chamber experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn fertilization increased mycorrhizal infection in the RP treatment in the growth-chamber experiment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Zn fertilizatione5
Interactor
mycorrhizale5symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal infectione5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
RP treatmente5
Setting
growth chamber experimente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e5

“Zn fertilization increased mycorrhizal infection in the RP treatment in the growth chamber experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl significantly decreased mycorrhizal infection in the RP soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
benomyle6
Interactor
mycorrhizale6symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal infectione6
Direction
decreasede6
Setting
RP soile6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e6

“Treatment with benomyl significantly decreased mycorrhizal infection, shoot dry weight, P concentration and P inflow in the RP soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl significantly decreased shoot dry weight, P concentration and P inflow in the RP soil, suggesting the fungal relationship is important for P absorption.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
benomyle6
Outcome
shoot dry weight, P concentration and P inflowe6
Direction
decreasede6
Qualifier
suggesting the fungal relationship is important for P absorption in this soile7
Setting
RP soile6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e6

“Treatment with benomyl significantly decreased mycorrhizal infection, shoot dry weight, P concentration and P inflow in the RP soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1425 · show in text ↑
e7

“suggesting the fungal relationship is important for P absorption in this soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1504 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no conclusive evidence that mycorrhizae are important for P absorption in the HP soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
mycorrhizaee1symbiont
Outcome
P absorptione1
Setting
HP soile1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no conclusive evidence that mycorrhizae are important for P absorption in the HP soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The HP treatment greatly decreased VAM infection in maize in both field and growth-chamber experiments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
HP treatmente1
Interactor
VAMe1symbiont
Outcome
VAM infectione1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
both field and growth chamber experimentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although HP treatment decreased VAM infection greatly in both field and growth chamber experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The HP treatment did not affect the absorption of Zn by maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
HP treatmente1
Outcome
absorption of Zne2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although HP treatment decreased VAM infection greatly in both field and growth chamber experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1701 · show in text ↑
e2

“it did not affect the absorption of Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl did not affect shoot Zn concentration in maize in field or growth-chamber experiments, suggesting that mycorrhizae are not important for Zn absorption on this soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Benomyle1
Outcome
shoot Zn concentratione1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
suggesting that mycorrhizae are not important in the absorption of Zn on this soile2
Setting
field or growth chamber experimentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the early growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) plants in southern Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“Benomyl did not affect the shoot Zn concentration in either field or growth chamber experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1838 · show in text ↑
e2

“suggesting that mycorrhizae are not important in the absorption of Zn on this soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1840–1922 · show in text ↑

benomyl · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

benomyl · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

244 papers: 190 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 190 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

240 papers more in this group

See all 244 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.