Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Twice-Split Phosphorus Application Alleviates Low Temperature Stress by Improving Root Physiology and Phosphorus Accumulation, Translocation, and Partitioning in Wheat

Hui Xu; Muhammad Ahmad Hassan; Jincai Li

12
claims
41
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the context of global warming, low temperature (LT) disasters in major crops are also becoming more common. LT stress in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, the central wheat region in China, caused a massive reduction in wheat yields. A step towards ensuring wheat yield stability and food security, this study investigated the effects of optimizing phosphorus application on the root physiology, dry matter phosphorus accumulation, translocation, and partitioning of wheat under LT stress, using the representative cultivar Yannong 19 as the test material. The treatments included conventional phosphorus application (R1) and twice-split phosphorus application (R2), followed by −4 °C LT treatment and normal temperature (NT) treatment during the anther interval stage. Analysis of the root physiology (enzymatic activities and acid phosphatase, contents of malondialdehyde, soluble sugar, and soluble protein), phosphorus and dry matter accumulation, translocation, partitioning, and agronomic and yield-related components was carried during this research study. The results showed that the wheat root activity was significantly reduced and the antioxidant enzyme activities were increased to mitigate the damage of LT stress. Moreover, LT treatments damaged root function. The root activity and antioxidant properties were significantly lower than those of the NT treatment at the flowering stage. The dry matter and phosphorus accumulations were reduced by 30.6~33.6% and 15.1~21.3% at the flowering and maturity stages, resulting in final yield losses of 10.3~13.0%. In contrast, root activity increased by 16.1~27.2% in the twice-split phosphorus application treatments, and the root antioxidant characteristics were higher. As a result, dry matter and phosphorus accumulation increased after twice-split phosphorus application and their translocation to the grains was more; the final yield increased by 5.5~7.3%. Overall, the twice-split phosphorus application enhanced the physiological function of the root system and promoted the accumulation of nutrients and their transport to the grain, and alleviated the yield loss of wheat caused by LT stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature significantly reduced wheat root activity.

Treatment
LT stresse1
Outcome
root activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
normal temperature (NT) treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the wheat root activity was significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1132 · show in text ↑
e1

“LT stress in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“normal temperature (NT) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature increased wheat root antioxidant enzyme activities.

Treatment
LT stresse0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normal temperature (NT) treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the antioxidant enzyme activities were increased to mitigate the damage of LT stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1221 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑
e2

“normal temperature (NT) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–730 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature damaged wheat root function.

Treatment
LT treatmentse0
Outcome
root functione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LT treatments damaged root function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering, low temperature reduced wheat root activity and antioxidant properties versus normal temperature.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
LT treatmentse2
Outcome
root activity and antioxidant propertiese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
NT treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root activity and antioxidant properties were significantly lower than those of the NT treatment at the flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1393 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑
e2

“LT treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature reduced wheat dry matter accumulation by 30.6~33.6% at flowering and maturity.

Organ / stage
flowering and maturity stagese0
Treatment
LT treatmentse1
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30.6~33.6%e0
Comparator
NT treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter and phosphorus accumulations were reduced by 30.6~33.6% and 15.1~21.3% at the flowering and maturity stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1517 · show in text ↑
e1

“LT treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1246 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑
e3

“NT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature reduced wheat phosphorus accumulation by 15.1~21.3% at flowering and maturity.

Organ / stage
flowering and maturity stagese0
Treatment
LT treatmentse1
Outcome
phosphorus accumulationse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15.1~21.3%e0
Comparator
NT treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter and phosphorus accumulations were reduced by 30.6~33.6% and 15.1~21.3% at the flowering and maturity stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1517 · show in text ↑
e1

“LT treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1246 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑
e3

“NT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature caused final wheat yield losses of 10.3~13.0%.

Treatment
LT treatmentse1
Outcome
final yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
10.3~13.0%e0
Comparator
NT treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in final yield losses of 10.3~13.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1564 · show in text ↑
e1

“LT treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1246 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑
e3

“NT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-split phosphorus application increased wheat root activity by 16.1~27.2%.

Treatment
twice-split phosphorus application treatmentse0
Outcome
root activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.1~27.2%e0
Comparator
conventional phosphorus application (R1)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root activity increased by 16.1~27.2% in the twice-split phosphorus application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1669 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional phosphorus application (R1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–616 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-split phosphorus application increased wheat root antioxidant characteristics.

Treatment
twice-split phosphorus application treatmentse1
Outcome
root antioxidant characteristicse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional phosphorus application (R1)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root antioxidant characteristics were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1723 · show in text ↑
e1

“twice-split phosphorus application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1669 · show in text ↑
e2

“conventional phosphorus application (R1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–616 · show in text ↑
e3

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-split phosphorus application increased wheat dry matter and phosphorus accumulation.

Treatment
twice-split phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
dry matter and phosphorus accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional phosphorus application (R1)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter and phosphorus accumulation increased after twice-split phosphorus application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1738–1827 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional phosphorus application (R1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–616 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-split phosphorus application increased nutrient translocation to wheat grain.

Treatment
twice-split phosphorus applicatione1
Outcome
translocation to the grainse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
conventional phosphorus application (R1)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their translocation to the grains was more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1832–1874 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased after twice-split phosphorus application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1827 · show in text ↑
e2

“conventional phosphorus application (R1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–616 · show in text ↑
e3

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-split phosphorus application increased final wheat yield by 5.5~7.3%.

Treatment
twice-split phosphorus applicatione1
Outcome
final yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.5~7.3%e0
Comparator
conventional phosphorus application (R1)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the final yield increased by 5.5~7.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1876–1913 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased after twice-split phosphorus application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1827 · show in text ↑
e2

“conventional phosphorus application (R1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–616 · show in text ↑
e3

“wheat root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1106 · show in text ↑

cold · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 21 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

cold · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cold · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 35 positive, 18 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

cold · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 34 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 158 positive, 35 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.