Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Optimizing Phosphorus Application for Winter Wheat Production in the Coastal Saline Area

Lu Liu; Qi Miao; Hongye Wang; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Phosphorous (P) fixation in saline soils is a concern worldwide. To investigate optimization strategies for P fertilizer application that improve P use efficiency (PUE) and crop yield in saline soil, in terms of P sources and rates, we conducted a two year field experiment in the coastal saline area of China to investigate the effects of P rates and sources, including superphosphate (SSP), monoammonium phosphate (MAP) and ammonium polyphosphate (APP) on yield, aboveground P uptake, agronomy efficiency (AEP), and soil available P of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Wheat yield, under the three P sources, increased with P rates and reached a plateau under 20 kg P ha−1 SSP,18 kg P ha−1 MAP, and 17 kg P ha−1 MAP, respectively. The application of SSP increased the wheat yield by 9–11% compared to MAP and APP. The aboveground P uptake of winter wheat under SSP was 14% and 13% higher than MAP and APP, respectively, under the optimal P application rate. The AEP under SSP was higher than the other two P sources under the same P rate. SSP increased the soil Ca2+ concentration by 20–42%, but decreased the Na+ concentration by 14–18% at the P rate of 26 kg P ha−1 in all soil layers, including 0–20, 20–40, 40–60 cm, compared to CK (0 kg P ha−1). The soil Olsen-P concentration under APP was higher than the other P sources. This study suggests that optimizing P sources and rates can improve wheat yield, PUE, and soil quality in the coastal saline soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield increased with phosphorus rate under three sources and reached source-specific plateaus.

Treatment
P ratese0
Outcome
Wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield, under the three P sources, increased with P rates and reached a plateau under 20 kg P ha−1 SSP,18 kg P ha−1 MAP, and 17 kg P ha−1 MAP, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield reached a plateau at 20 kg P ha−1 with SSP.

Treatment
20 kg P ha−1 SSPe0
Outcome
Wheat yielde0
Direction
plateaue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield, under the three P sources, increased with P rates and reached a plateau under 20 kg P ha−1 SSP,18 kg P ha−1 MAP, and 17 kg P ha−1 MAP, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield reached a plateau at 18 kg P ha−1 with MAP.

Treatment
18 kg P ha−1 MAPe0
Outcome
Wheat yielde0
Direction
plateaue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield, under the three P sources, increased with P rates and reached a plateau under 20 kg P ha−1 SSP,18 kg P ha−1 MAP, and 17 kg P ha−1 MAP, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The abstract reports another wheat yield plateau at 17 kg P ha−1 MAP, despite repeating MAP in its source list.

Treatment
17 kg P ha−1 MAPe0
Outcome
Wheat yielde0
Direction
plateaue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield, under the three P sources, increased with P rates and reached a plateau under 20 kg P ha−1 SSP,18 kg P ha−1 MAP, and 17 kg P ha−1 MAP, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP raised wheat yield by 9–11% relative to MAP.

Treatment
SSPe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9–11%e0
Comparator
MAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of SSP increased the wheat yield by 9–11% compared to MAP and APP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP raised wheat yield by 9–11% relative to APP.

Treatment
SSPe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9–11%e0
Comparator
APPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of SSP increased the wheat yield by 9–11% compared to MAP and APP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With optimal application rates, SSP raised aboveground wheat phosphorus uptake by 14% relative to MAP.

Treatment
SSPe0
Outcome
aboveground P uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
MAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aboveground P uptake of winter wheat under SSP was 14% and 13% higher than MAP and APP, respectively, under the optimal P application rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With optimal application rates, SSP raised aboveground wheat phosphorus uptake by 13% relative to APP.

Treatment
SSPe0
Outcome
aboveground P uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
APPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aboveground P uptake of winter wheat under SSP was 14% and 13% higher than MAP and APP, respectively, under the optimal P application rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP had higher agronomic phosphorus efficiency than MAP at the same phosphorus rate.

Treatment
SSPe0
Outcome
AEPe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other two P sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AEP under SSP was higher than the other two P sources under the same P rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP increased soil calcium concentration by 20–42% relative to the zero-phosphorus control.

Treatment
26 kg P ha−1e0
Outcome
soil Ca2+ concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20–42%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSP increased the soil Ca2+ concentration by 20–42%, but decreased the Na+ concentration by 14–18% at the P rate of 26 kg P ha−1 in all soil layers, including 0–20, 20–40, 40–60 cm, compared to CK (0 kg P ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP decreased soil sodium concentration by 14–18% relative to the zero-phosphorus control.

Treatment
26 kg P ha−1e0
Outcome
Na+ concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
14–18%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSP increased the soil Ca2+ concentration by 20–42%, but decreased the Na+ concentration by 14–18% at the P rate of 26 kg P ha−1 in all soil layers, including 0–20, 20–40, 40–60 cm, compared to CK (0 kg P ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APP produced higher soil Olsen-P concentration than the other phosphorus sources.

Treatment
APPe0
Outcome
soil Olsen-P concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other P sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil Olsen-P concentration under APP was higher than the other P sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that optimizing phosphorus sources and rates can improve wheat yield, phosphorus use efficiency and soil quality in coastal saline soil.

Outcome
optimizing P sources and rates can improve wheat yield, PUE, and soil qualitye0
Setting
coastal saline soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study suggests that optimizing P sources and rates can improve wheat yield, PUE, and soil quality in the coastal saline soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.