Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Evaluation of Insecticide Rotations Against Rice Brown Planthopper nilaparvata lugens (Stal)

Anand Kumar A. D. V. S. L. P.; Mallikharjuna Rao N.; Rama Rao C. V.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out to evaluate the efficacy of certain insecticide rotations against rice brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) at the Regional Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru, Andhra Pradesh during kharif 2017 and rabi 2017-18. The results revealed that fipronil (1000 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha), buprofezin (800 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) and acephate (750 g/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) were the most effective insecticide rotations in a crop season. These also gave higher grain yields. The insecticide rotations, acephate (750 g/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) and fipronil (1000 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) gave the maximum cost benefit ratio of 1: 6.01 and 1: 6.03, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil followed by pymetrozine was among the most effective rotations.

Treatment
fipronil (1000 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha)e0
Interactor
nilaparvata lugensNilaparvata lugenst0pest
Outcome
most effective insecticide rotationse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that fipronil (1000 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha), buprofezin (800 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) and acephate (750 g/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) were the most effective insecticide rotations in a crop season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Brown Planthopper nilaparvata lugens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buprofezin followed by pymetrozine was among the most effective rotations.

Treatment
buprofezin (800 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha)e0
Interactor
nilaparvata lugensNilaparvata lugenst0pest
Outcome
most effective insecticide rotationse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that fipronil (1000 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha), buprofezin (800 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) and acephate (750 g/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) were the most effective insecticide rotations in a crop season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Brown Planthopper nilaparvata lugens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate followed by pymetrozine was among the most effective rotations.

Treatment
acephate (750 g/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha)e0
Interactor
nilaparvata lugensNilaparvata lugenst0pest
Outcome
most effective insecticide rotationse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that fipronil (1000 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha), buprofezin (800 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) and acephate (750 g/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) were the most effective insecticide rotations in a crop season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Brown Planthopper nilaparvata lugens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three effective rotations gave higher grain yields.

Treatment
insecticide rotationst1
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These also gave higher grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Brown Planthopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–66 · show in text ↑
t1

“The insecticide rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–592 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate followed by pymetrozine had a maximum cost benefit ratio of 1: 6.01.

Treatment
acephate (750 g/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha)e0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1: 6.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The insecticide rotations, acephate (750 g/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) and fipronil (1000 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) gave the maximum cost benefit ratio of 1: 6.01 and 1: 6.03, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Brown Planthopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil followed by pymetrozine had a maximum cost benefit ratio of 1: 6.03.

Treatment
fipronil (1000 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha)e0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1: 6.03e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The insecticide rotations, acephate (750 g/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) and fipronil (1000 ml/ha) followed by pymetrozine (300 g/ha) gave the maximum cost benefit ratio of 1: 6.01 and 1: 6.03, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Brown Planthopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–66 · show in text ↑

acephate · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Eight named insecticides produced higher planthopper resurgence ratios than six comparators at recommended dose.

    Factor Influencing the Resurgence of Brown Planthopper in Bangladesh · 2020 · compared with imidacloprid, cartap, dinotefuran, isoprocarb /MIPC, phenthoate, pymetrozine

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fipronil · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

pymetrozine · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

buprofezin · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

insecticide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

60 papers: 50 positive, 10 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

rotation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 72 positive, 14 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.