Paper · 2020 · SAARC Journal of Agriculture

Factor Influencing the Resurgence of Brown Planthopper in Bangladesh

ABMA Uddin; KS Islam; M Jahan; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Possible causes of brown plant hopper resurgence were determined at the net-house of Entomology Division of Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) during 2015. Causes of resurgence in the form of resurgence ratios were higher with acetamiprid, acephate, chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenvalerate, lambda cyhalothrin, thiamethoxam insecticides compared to imidacloprid, cartap, dinotefuran, isoprocarb /MIPC, phenthoate, pymetrozine when even applied at recommended dose. However, thiamethoxam, imidacloprid, isoprocarb / MIPC and cartap applied at sub-lethal dose produced higher resurgence ratio of BPH than others. Isoprocarb / MIPC, a commonly used recommended insecticide was found to have a higher resurgence ratio with the insecticide treatment at the egg stage (1.71) and combination of all stages (0.82). These insecticides influenced on the growth and reproductive physiology of rice brown planthopper and consequently resurgence ratio ranged increased. SAARC J. Agri., 18(1): 117-128 (2020)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight named insecticides produced higher planthopper resurgence ratios than six comparators at recommended dose.

Treatment
acetamiprid, acephate, chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenvalerate, lambda cyhalothrin, thiamethoxam insecticidese0
Interactor
brown planthopperNilaparvata lugense1pest
Outcome
resurgence ratiose0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
imidacloprid, cartap, dinotefuran, isoprocarb /MIPC, phenthoate, pymetrozinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resurgence ratios were higher with acetamiprid, acephate, chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenvalerate, lambda cyhalothrin, thiamethoxam insecticides compared to imidacloprid, cartap, dinotefuran, isoprocarb /MIPC, phenthoate, pymetrozine when even applied at recommended dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–485 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice brown planthopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sublethal thiamethoxam, imidacloprid, isoprocarb/MIPC and cartap produced higher BPH resurgence ratios than other treatments.

Treatment
thiamethoxam, imidacloprid, isoprocarb / MIPC and cartap applied at sub-lethal dosee0
Interactor
brown planthopperNilaparvata lugense1pest
Outcome
resurgence ratio of BPHe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam, imidacloprid, isoprocarb / MIPC and cartap applied at sub-lethal dose produced higher resurgence ratio of BPH than others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–631 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice brown planthopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–925 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoprocarb/MIPC treatment at the egg stage produced a resurgence ratio of 1.71.

Organ / stage
egg stagee0
Treatment
Isoprocarb / MIPCe0
Interactor
brown planthopperNilaparvata lugense1pest
Outcome
resurgence ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.71e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoprocarb / MIPC, a commonly used recommended insecticide was found to have a higher resurgence ratio with the insecticide treatment at the egg stage (1.71)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice brown planthopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–925 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoprocarb/MIPC treatment across all stages produced a resurgence ratio of 0.82.

Organ / stage
all stagese0
Treatment
Isoprocarb / MIPCe1
Interactor
brown planthopperNilaparvata lugense2pest
Outcome
resurgence ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Value
0.82e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of all stages (0.82)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–826 · show in text ↑
e1

“Isoprocarb / MIPC, a commonly used recommended insecticide was found to have a higher resurgence ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice brown planthopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–925 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticides influenced growth and reproductive physiology of the rice planthopper and increased resurgence ratios.

Treatment
These insecticidese0
Interactor
brown planthopperNilaparvata lugense0pest
Outcome
resurgence ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
growth and reproductive physiologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These insecticides influenced on the growth and reproductive physiology of rice brown planthopper and consequently resurgence ratio ranged increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–977 · show in text ↑

isoprocarb · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lambda-cyhalothrin · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cartap · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

acetamiprid · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

thiamethoxam · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

acephate · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

deltamethrin · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

imidacloprid · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.