Abstract
This work was carried out at a Private Farm Located at Anba Bishoy Monastry, Wadi El Natroun Distract, Beheria Governorate, Egypt during the two successive summer seasons of 2017 and 2018 to study the effect of salicylic acid concentrations (SA) (0, 50, 75 and 100 ppm) as foliar spray on dry weight, productivity and pod quality of two snap bean cultivars (Buffalo and Douglas) grown in saline soil and irrigated with drip irrigation system. Spraying snap bean Buffalo cultivar grown in saline soil with SA at 100 ppm, increased dry weight of leaves, branches, shoots/plant, average pod weight, yield/plant, total yield/fad., total protein and total carbohydrates in pods, whereas decreased proline content in leaf tissues. There were no significant differences between SA at 50 ppm and control in most studied characters of snap bean. In this regard, the increases in total yield/fad., were about 65.70 and 53.84 % for the interaction between Buffalo cultivar and SA at 100 ppm as well as 45.79 and 40.30 % for the interaction between Buffalo cultivar and SA at 75 ppm over the interaction between Douglas cultivar and control in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
At 100 ppm, salicylic acid increased Buffalo snap bean leaf, branch and shoot dry weight.
- Taxon
- snap beane0
- Material
- Buffaloe0
- Treatment
- SA at 100 ppme0
- Outcome
- dry weight of leaves, branches, shoots/plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- grown in saline soile0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Spraying snap bean Buffalo cultivar grown in saline soil with SA at 100 ppm, increased dry weight of leaves, branches, shoots/plant, average pod weight, yield/plant, total yield/fad., total protein and total carbohydrates in pods, whereas decreased proline content in leaf tissues”
Claim · model-written summary
At 100 ppm, salicylic acid increased Buffalo snap bean pod weight and yield.
- Taxon
- snap beane0
- Material
- Buffaloe0
- Treatment
- SA at 100 ppme0
- Outcome
- average pod weight, yield/plant, total yield/fad.e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Spraying snap bean Buffalo cultivar grown in saline soil with SA at 100 ppm, increased dry weight of leaves, branches, shoots/plant, average pod weight, yield/plant, total yield/fad., total protein and total carbohydrates in pods, whereas decreased proline content in leaf tissues”
Claim · model-written summary
At 100 ppm, salicylic acid increased total protein and carbohydrates in Buffalo pods.
- Taxon
- snap beane0
- Material
- Buffaloe0
- Treatment
- SA at 100 ppme0
- Outcome
- total protein and total carbohydrates in podse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Spraying snap bean Buffalo cultivar grown in saline soil with SA at 100 ppm, increased dry weight of leaves, branches, shoots/plant, average pod weight, yield/plant, total yield/fad., total protein and total carbohydrates in pods, whereas decreased proline content in leaf tissues”
Claim · model-written summary
At 100 ppm, salicylic acid decreased proline in Buffalo leaves.
- Taxon
- snap beane0
- Material
- Buffaloe0
- Treatment
- SA at 100 ppme0
- Outcome
- proline content in leaf tissuese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Spraying snap bean Buffalo cultivar grown in saline soil with SA at 100 ppm, increased dry weight of leaves, branches, shoots/plant, average pod weight, yield/plant, total yield/fad., total protein and total carbohydrates in pods, whereas decreased proline content in leaf tissues”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50 ppm, salicylic acid did not differ significantly from control for most snap bean traits.
Verbatim
e0“There were no significant differences between SA at 50 ppm and control in most studied characters of snap bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Buffalo with 100 ppm SA had 65.70 and 53.84 % greater total yield than Douglas control in successive seasons.
Verbatim
t0“SNAP BEAN”
e0“the increases in total yield/fad., were about 65.70 and 53.84 % for the interaction between Buffalo cultivar and SA at 100 ppm as well as 45.79 and 40.30 % for the interaction between Buffalo cultivar and SA at 75 ppm over the interaction between Douglas cultivar and control in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Buffalo with 75 ppm SA had 45.79 and 40.30 % greater total yield than Douglas control in successive seasons.
Verbatim
t0“SNAP BEAN”
e0“the increases in total yield/fad., were about 65.70 and 53.84 % for the interaction between Buffalo cultivar and SA at 100 ppm as well as 45.79 and 40.30 % for the interaction between Buffalo cultivar and SA at 75 ppm over the interaction between Douglas cultivar and control in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively”
The same questions in other papers
salicylic acid · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →salicylic acid · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →salicylic acid · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.