COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SOME INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUCKING INSECT PESTS ON MUNGBEAN, VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK

Abstract

A field study was conducted to evaluate one combination of seed treatment with imidacloprid (Confidor 70 WS) and spray with detergent and for insecticide sprays: imidacloprid (Confidor 20% SL), acetamiprid (Acelan 20% SL), thiomethoxam (Actara 25 WG) and acephate (Commando 75 SP), against sucking insect pests on mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) at Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkar during 2012. All the treatments showed a significant difference with one another, regarding their effectiveness. The application of insecticide sprays immediately enhanced the mortality of the pests, whereas, the effect of seed-treatment and detergent did not show distinctive effect on the pests’ population. Imidacloprid and thiomethoxam resulted in a maximum mortality of the jassid, followed by acetamiprid. While in case of whitefly, imidacloprid was the most effective and resulted in a minimum population followed by acetamiprid. Acephate resulted in the maximum control of thrips and was found the most effective insecticide, followed by acetamiprid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticide treatments differed significantly from one another in effectiveness against sucking insect pests on mungbean.

Taxon: mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment: All the treatmentse1
Outcome: effectivenesse1
Setting: Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Vigna radiata* · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“against sucking insect pests on mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) at Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkar during 2012”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–402 · show in text ↑

e1
“All the treatments showed a significant difference with one another, regarding their effectiveness”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–502 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide sprays immediately enhanced the mortality of sucking insect pests on mungbean compared with seed treatment and detergent.

Taxon: mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment: insecticide sprayse2
Interactor: sucking insect pestse0pest
Outcome: mortality of the pestse2
Direction: enhancede2
Comparator: seed-treatment and detergente2
Setting: Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“against sucking insect pests on mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) at Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkar during 2012”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–402 · show in text ↑

e2
“The application of insecticide sprays immediately enhanced the mortality of the pests, whereas, the effect of seed-treatment and detergent did not show distinctive effect on the pests’ population”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–699 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment and detergent had no distinctive effect on the population of sucking insect pests on mungbean.

Taxon: mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment: seed-treatment and detergente2
Interactor: sucking insect pestse0pest
Outcome: populatione2
Direction: did not show distinctive effecte2
Setting: Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“against sucking insect pests on mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) at Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkar during 2012”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–402 · show in text ↑

e2
“The application of insecticide sprays immediately enhanced the mortality of the pests, whereas, the effect of seed-treatment and detergent did not show distinctive effect on the pests’ population”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–699 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid and thiomethoxam gave the maximum mortality of jassid, followed by acetamiprid.

Taxon: mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment: Imidacloprid and thiomethoxame3
Interactor: jasside3pest
Outcome: mortality of the jasside3
Direction: maximume3
Comparator: acetamipride3
Setting: Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“against sucking insect pests on mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) at Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkar during 2012”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–402 · show in text ↑

e3
“Imidacloprid and thiomethoxam resulted in a maximum mortality of the jassid, followed by acetamiprid”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–801 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid gave the minimum whitefly population, followed by acetamiprid, and was the most effective insecticide against whitefly.

Taxon: mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment: imidaclopride4
Interactor: whiteflye4pest
Outcome: populatione4
Direction: minimume4
Comparator: acetamipride4
Setting: Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“against sucking insect pests on mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) at Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkar during 2012”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–402 · show in text ↑

e4
“While in case of whitefly, imidacloprid was the most effective and resulted in a minimum population followed by acetamiprid”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–926 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate gave the maximum control of thrips, followed by acetamiprid.

Taxon: mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment: Acephatee5
Interactor: thripsThripse5pest
Outcome: control of thripse5
Direction: maximume5
Comparator: acetamipride5
Setting: Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Thrips* · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“against sucking insect pests on mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) at Arid Zone Research Institute (AZRI), Bhakkar during 2012”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–402 · show in text ↑

e5
“Acephate resulted in the maximum control of thrips and was found the most effective insecticide, followed by acetamiprid”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1048 · show in text ↑

detergent · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

negative
E Color was more toxic than Arau at all tested concentrations.
Comparison of the Toxicities of E Color and Arau Detergents toward Vigna Radiata (Mung Bean) Seedlings · 2023 · compared with Arau liquid laundry detergent
Same direction

See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

positive
Imidacloprid seed treatment reduced sucking pests by 40.2 to 81.4%.
Pest spectra, succession and its yield losses in mungbean and urdbean underchanging climatic scenario · 2014
Same direction
positive
Imidacloprid seed treatment kept sucking pest infestation low through 30 DAS.
Effect of insecticides against major sucking pests of Green gram in Coastal Odisha · 2016 · compared with other treatments
Same direction
positive
Imidacloprid seed treatment plus spinosad spray was effective against thrips and pod borers.
Relative efficacy and economics of seed treatment and newer insecticides against sucking and borer pests of summer mungbean in coastal Odisha · 2018
Same direction

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

insecticide · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

negative
Synthetic pesticides applied on schedule or based on control threshold killed the entire population of natural enemies in mungbean.
BIOPESTICIDE EFFICACY AGAINST MAIN PESTS, DISEASES, AND NATURAL ENEMIES OF MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA L.) · 2022
Opposite direction
positive
Fenvalerate reduced mean weevil numbers relative to other insecticides in the field.
Evaluation of insecticides against Apion amplum under laboratory and field conditions · 2011 · compared with other insecticides
Same direction
positive
The exposed insecticides ranked in a persistent toxicity order, with imidacloprid most persistent and profenophos least.
Bioefficacy and Residual Toxicity of Selected Insecticides against Sucking Pests infesting Green gram · 2022
Same direction

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

seed treatment · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

positive
Irnicon spray was numerically most effective against whitefly.
RELATIVE TOXICITY OF DIFFERENT INSECTICIDES AGAINST WHITEFLY, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) AND BLACK THRIPS, Caliothrips indicus ON NM-92 MUNG BEAN, Vigna radiata (L.) · 2002
Same directionCited by this paper
no effect
Nodule abundance, color, position and effective nodulation did not differ significantly among spray times.
Best time of spraying irradiated carrageenan on the growth, yield and root nodulation of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] · 2023
Opposite direction
positive
Monocrotophos foliar application reduced insect and mite pests by a mean 35.6 to 90.3%.
Pest spectra, succession and its yield losses in mungbean and urdbean underchanging climatic scenario · 2014
Same direction

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Abstract

Claims 6

The same questions in other papers

detergent · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

imidacloprid · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

insecticide · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

seed treatment · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

application · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results