Paper · 2016 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Effect of insecticides against major sucking pests of Green gram in Coastal Odisha

Arundhati Sasmal; Sandeep Kumar

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

During kharif, 2013, highest percentage reduction (84.2%) in aphid population over control was observed in treatments with thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L followed by thiamethoxam @ 0.2g/L (83.5%) and clothianidin @ 0.1g/L (83.5%). During kharif, 2014, similar trend was observed with lowest aphid infestation in thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L with 91.0% reduction over control. During kharif, 2013 at 3 DAS, 71.4% reduction of the white fly population was marked in acetamiprid @ 0.3g/L followed by acetamiprid @ 0.2g/L (70.6%) and thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L (68.8%). Similar trend of efficacy was found during kharif, 2014. Thrips was managed most effectively by thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L followed by acetamiprid @ 0.2g/L at 3 days after spray. The intensity of infestation by sucking insect pests was very low in the seed treatment plots up to 30 DAS as compared to other treatments revealed the effectiveness of seed treatment with imidacloprid 70WS @ 5g/kg in green gram. In both the seasons, highest yield (7.90q/ha) was obtained in thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L treated plots as compared to 5.85q/ha in untreated control plot. The seed treatment with imidacloprid @ 5g/kg along with one foliar spray of thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L at flower initiation stage may be considered as an effective plant protection schedule for management of major sucking pests and achieving higher yield in mung bean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam at 0.3g/L reduced aphids by 84.2% in 2013.

Treatment
thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/Le0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
84.2%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During kharif, 2013, highest percentage reduction (84.2%) in aphid population over control was observed in treatments with thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam at 0.2g/L reduced aphids by 83.5% in 2013.

Treatment
thiamethoxam @ 0.2g/Le0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
83.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aphid population over control was observed in treatments with thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L followed by thiamethoxam @ 0.2g/L (83.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clothianidin at 0.1g/L reduced aphids by 83.5% in 2013.

Treatment
clothianidin @ 0.1g/Le0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
83.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest percentage reduction (84.2%) in aphid population over control was observed in treatments with thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L followed by thiamethoxam @ 0.2g/L (83.5%) and clothianidin @ 0.1g/L (83.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam at 0.3g/L reduced aphids by 91.0% in 2014.

Treatment
thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/Le0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid infestatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
91.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During kharif, 2014, similar trend was observed with lowest aphid infestation in thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L with 91.0% reduction over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid at 0.3g/L reduced white fly populations by 71.4% in 2013.

Treatment
acetamiprid @ 0.3g/Le0
Interactor
white flye0pest
Outcome
white fly populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
71.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During kharif, 2013 at 3 DAS, 71.4% reduction of the white fly population was marked in acetamiprid @ 0.3g/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid at 0.2g/L reduced white fly populations by 70.6% in 2013.

Treatment
acetamiprid @ 0.2g/Le0
Interactor
white flye0pest
Outcome
white fly populatione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
70.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“white fly population was marked in acetamiprid @ 0.3g/L followed by acetamiprid @ 0.2g/L (70.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam at 0.3g/L reduced white fly populations by 68.8% in 2013.

Treatment
thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/Le0
Interactor
white flye0pest
Outcome
white fly populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
68.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction of the white fly population was marked in acetamiprid @ 0.3g/L followed by acetamiprid @ 0.2g/L (70.6%) and thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L (68.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam at 0.3g/L was most effective against thrips after spray.

Treatment
thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/Le0
Interactor
ThripsThripse0pest
Outcome
Thripse0
Direction
most effectivelye0
Comparator
acetamiprid @ 0.2g/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thrips was managed most effectively by thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L followed by acetamiprid @ 0.2g/L at 3 days after spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid seed treatment kept sucking pest infestation low through 30 DAS.

Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid 70WS @ 5g/kge0
Interactor
sucking insect pestse0pest
Outcome
intensity of infestation by sucking insect pestse0
Direction
very lowe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intensity of infestation by sucking insect pests was very low in the seed treatment plots up to 30 DAS as compared to other treatments revealed the effectiveness of seed treatment with imidacloprid 70WS @ 5g/kg in green gram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam at 0.3g/L produced 7.90q/ha, versus 5.85q/ha in untreated plots.

Treatment
thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/Le0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.90q/hae0
Qualifier
5.85q/hae0
Comparator
untreated control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both the seasons, highest yield (7.90q/ha) was obtained in thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L treated plots as compared to 5.85q/ha in untreated control plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend imidacloprid seed treatment plus thiamethoxam spray for sucking pest management and yield.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid @ 5g/kg along with one foliar spray of thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/Le0
Interactor
major sucking pestse0pest
Outcome
management of major sucking pests and achieving higher yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed treatment with imidacloprid @ 5g/kg along with one foliar spray of thiamethoxam @ 0.3g/L at flower initiation stage may be considered as an effective plant protection schedule for management of major sucking pests and achieving higher yield in mung bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1361 · show in text ↑

acetamiprid · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thiamethoxam · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

thiamethoxam · Thrips · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

thiamethoxam · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

seed treatment · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.