Paper · 2023 · Russian Journal of General Chemistry

Comparison of the Toxicities of E Color and Arau Detergents toward Vigna Radiata (Mung Bean) Seedlings

V. A. Poklonov; E. V. Anikina; S. A. Ostroumov; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The concentrations of synthetic surfactants in wastewater can exceed 30 g/L. The hazard posed by these substances needs to be demonstrated. E Color powder laundry detergent exhibited stronger toxicity toward Vigna radiata seedlings than Arau liquid laundry detergent at all the concentrations tested. The incubation in all Petri dishes lasted for 96 h. Arau caused no toxic effect at concentrations of 0.05 and 0.5 g/L; E Color produced toxic effects at these concentrations. The new data show that Vigna radiata is applicable for assessing the hazard of pollutants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E Color was more toxic than Arau at all tested concentrations.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
E Color powder laundry detergente0
Outcome
toxicity toward Vigna radiata seedlingse0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
Arau liquid laundry detergente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E Color powder laundry detergent exhibited stronger toxicity toward Vigna radiata seedlings than Arau liquid laundry detergent at all the concentrations tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arau had no toxic effect at 0.05 and 0.5 g/L.

Taxon
Vigna RadiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Araue0
Outcome
toxic effecte0
Direction
no toxic effecte0
Value
0.05 and 0.5 g/Le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arau caused no toxic effect at concentrations of 0.05 and 0.5 g/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna Radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E Color had toxic effects at those concentrations.

Taxon
Vigna RadiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
E Colore0
Outcome
toxic effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E Color produced toxic effects at these concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna Radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigna radiata was judged applicable for pollutant hazard assessment.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Outcome
applicable for assessing the hazard of pollutantse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vigna radiata is applicable for assessing the hazard of pollutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–574 · show in text ↑

detergent · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 26 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.