Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Field evaluation of soil application of bio-fertilizer for intensity of Sigatoka leaf spot and yield of banana

RV Deshmukh; SV Dhutraj

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2016-17 at banana Reararch Station, Nanded to study the effect of soil application of biofertilizer on the intensity of sigatoka leaf spot disease and yield of banana. Three Biofertilizers Viz Trhcoderma harzianum, Azospirillum lipoforum and phosphate solublizing bacteria (PSB) Pseudomonas polymixa were applied through soil at 25 g per plant in split doses. Soil application of biofertilizer is applied with 75 per r and 100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizer considering the effectiveness of soil application of bio fertilizers along with 75 per cent RDF and 100 RDF, treatment T9 i.e. 100 per cent RDF with soil application of Trichoderma harizanum +Azosprillum + PSB@25 g per plant recorded significantly minimum per cent diseases severity index of sigatoka leaf spot (20.92%) and obtainted maximum banana yield (109.15 mt /ha)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of Trichoderma harizanum, Azospirillum and PSB with 100% RDF (T9) gave the minimum disease severity index of Sigatoka leaf spot, 20.92%.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
soil application of Trichoderma harizanum +Azosprillum + PSB@25 g per plante2
Interactor
sigatoka leaf spote2pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harizanume2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
per cent diseases severity index of sigatoka leaf spote2
Direction
minimume2
Value
20.92%e2
Setting
banana Reararch Station, Nandede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted during 2016-17 at banana Reararch Station, Nanded to study the effect of soil application of biofertilizer on the intensity of sigatoka leaf spot disease and yield of banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–206 · show in text ↑
e2

“treatment T9 i.e. 100 per cent RDF with soil application of Trichoderma harizanum +Azosprillum + PSB@25 g per plant recorded significantly minimum per cent diseases severity index of sigatoka leaf spot (20.92%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T9 treatment (100% RDF with soil-applied biofertilizers) gave the maximum banana yield, 109.15 mt/ha.

Taxon
bananae3
Treatment
soil application of Trichoderma harizanum +Azosprillum + PSB@25 g per plante2
Outcome
banana yielde3
Direction
maximume3
Value
109.15 mt /hae3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“treatment T9 i.e. 100 per cent RDF with soil application of Trichoderma harizanum +Azosprillum + PSB@25 g per plant recorded significantly minimum per cent diseases severity index of sigatoka leaf spot (20.92%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–826 · show in text ↑
e3

“obtainted maximum banana yield (109.15 mt /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–877 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · yield · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma · disease · MusaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · yield · MusaResults differ

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

28 papers: 26 positive, 2 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

37 papers: 15 positive, 22 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

application · yield · MusaResults agree

55 papers: 55 positive, 0 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.