Paper · 2000 · Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries)

Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) did not affect banana production in subtropical Australia.

J. M. Stanton; J. A. Cobon

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are thought to reduce growth and yield of banana in the subtropics and that in vitro-propagated plants are more intolerant than those established conventionally from sucker or corm pieces. This paper describes a field trial in subtropical Queensland, Australia, on a site which was naturally infested with spiral nematode (Helicotylenchus dihystera) and inoculated with M. javanica, but where there were no Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus goodeyi or P. coffeae. It compared the effects of M. javanica and H. dihystera on in vitro-propagated and conventionally-grown plants. Inoculation with M. javanica did not affect any parameter of plant growth or yield in the plant crop of either planting type or in the first ratoon of in vitro-propagated plants. However, in the first ratoon crop of plants established as suckers, inoculation with M. javanica reduced numbers of fingers and hands per bunch but did not affect bunch weight. There was no correlation between plant growth or yield and numbers of M. javanica in either planting type in either plant or first ratoon crop, with 0-43 736 M. javanica/100 g root and 0-7940/200 g soil. H. dihystera populations in roots (0-420/100 g) were negatively correlated with growth and yield of the first ratoon of plants established as suckers but positively correlated with growth and yield of plants established as in vitro-propagated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with M. javanica did not affect plant growth or yield of banana in the plant crop of either planting type.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Inoculation with M. javanicae1
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pest
Outcome
any parameter of plant growth or yielde1
Direction
did not affecte1
Qualifier
in the plant crop of either planting typee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“did not affect banana production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with M. javanica did not affect any parameter of plant growth or yield in the plant crop of either planting type or in the first ratoon of in vitro-propagated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with M. javanica did not affect plant growth or yield of in vitro-propagated banana in the first ratoon.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Inoculation with M. javanicae1
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pest
Outcome
any parameter of plant growth or yielde1
Direction
did not affecte1
Qualifier
in the first ratoon of in vitro-propagated plantse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“did not affect banana production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with M. javanica did not affect any parameter of plant growth or yield in the plant crop of either planting type or in the first ratoon of in vitro-propagated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with M. javanica reduced the numbers of fingers and hands per bunch of suckers in the first ratoon crop of banana.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
inoculation with M. javanicae2
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae2pest
Outcome
numbers of fingers and hands per bunche2
Direction
reducede2
Qualifier
first ratoon crop of plants established as suckerse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“did not affect banana production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–74 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the first ratoon crop of plants established as suckers, inoculation with M. javanica reduced numbers of fingers and hands per bunch but did not affect bunch weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with M. javanica did not affect bunch weight of banana in the first ratoon crop of suckers.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
inoculation with M. javanicae2
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae2pest
Outcome
bunch weighte2
Direction
did not affecte2
Qualifier
first ratoon crop of plants established as suckerse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“did not affect banana production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–74 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the first ratoon crop of plants established as suckers, inoculation with M. javanica reduced numbers of fingers and hands per bunch but did not affect bunch weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–968 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Numbers of M. javanica showed no correlation with banana plant growth or yield.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae3pest
Outcome
plant growth or yielde3
Direction
no correlatione3

Verbatim

t0

“did not affect banana production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–74 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was no correlation between plant growth or yield and numbers of M. javanica in either planting type in either plant or first ratoon crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. dihystera populations in banana roots were negatively correlated with growth and yield of the first ratoon of suckers.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
H. dihysteraHelicotylenchus dihysterae4pest
Outcome
growth and yielde4
Direction
negatively correlatede4
Qualifier
first ratoon of plants established as suckerse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helicotylenchus dihystera
Helicotylenchus dihystera · InteractorJIRCAS Library · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“did not affect banana production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–74 · show in text ↑
e4

“H. dihystera populations in roots (0-420/100 g) were negatively correlated with growth and yield of the first ratoon of plants established as suckers but positively correlated with growth and yield of plants established as in vitro-propagated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1423 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. dihystera populations in banana roots were positively correlated with growth and yield of in vitro-propagated plants.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
H. dihysteraHelicotylenchus dihysterae4pest
Outcome
growth and yielde4
Direction
positively correlatede4
Qualifier
plants established as in vitro-propagated plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helicotylenchus dihystera
Helicotylenchus dihystera · InteractorJIRCAS Library · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“did not affect banana production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–74 · show in text ↑
e4

“H. dihystera populations in roots (0-420/100 g) were negatively correlated with growth and yield of the first ratoon of plants established as suckers but positively correlated with growth and yield of plants established as in vitro-propagated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1423 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

28 papers: 26 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.