Paper · 2018 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effect of elevated [CO2] on yield, intra‐plant nutrient dynamics, and grain quality of rice cultivars in eastern India

Usha R Jena; Dillip K Swain; Kali K Hazra; et al.

14
claims
14
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Climate models predict an increase in global temperature in response to a doubling of atmospheric [CO 2 ]. This may affect future rice production and quality. In this study, the effect of elevated [CO 2 ] on yield, nutrient acquisition and utilization, and grain quality of rice genotypes was investigated in the subtropical climate of eastern India (Kharagpur). Three environments (open field, ambient, and elevated [CO 2 ]) were tested using four rice cultivars of eastern India. RESULTS Under elevated [CO 2 ] (25% higher), the yield of high‐yielding cultivars (HYCs) viz IR 36, Swarna, and Swarna sub1 was significantly reduced (by 11–13%), whereas the yield increased (by 6–9%) for Badshabhog, a low‐yielding aromatic cultivar. Elevated [CO 2 ] significantly enhanced K uptake (by 14–21%), but did not influence the uptake of total N and P. The nutrient harvest index and use efficiency values in HYCs were reduced under elevated [CO 2 ] indicating that nutrient translocation from source to sink (grain) was significantly reduced. An increase in alkali spreading value (10%) and reduction in grain protein (2–3%) and iron (5–6%) was also observed upon [CO 2 ] elevation. CONCLUSION The study highlights the importance of nutrient management (increasing N rate for HYCs) and selective breeding of tolerant cultivars in minimizing the adverse effects of elevated [CO 2 ] on rice yield and quality. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced yield of IR 36 by 11–13%.

Material
IR 36e0
Treatment
elevated [CO 2 ]e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11–13%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under elevated [CO 2 ] (25% higher), the yield of high‐yielding cultivars (HYCs) viz IR 36, Swarna, and Swarna sub1 was significantly reduced (by 11–13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced yield of Swarna by 11–13%.

Material
Swarnae0
Treatment
elevated [CO 2 ]e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11–13%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under elevated [CO 2 ] (25% higher), the yield of high‐yielding cultivars (HYCs) viz IR 36, Swarna, and Swarna sub1 was significantly reduced (by 11–13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced yield of Swarna sub1 by 11–13%.

Material
Swarna sub1e0
Treatment
elevated [CO 2 ]e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11–13%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under elevated [CO 2 ] (25% higher), the yield of high‐yielding cultivars (HYCs) viz IR 36, Swarna, and Swarna sub1 was significantly reduced (by 11–13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased Badshabhog yield by 6–9%.

Material
Badshabhoge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6–9%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“whereas the yield increased (by 6–9%) for Badshabhog, a low‐yielding aromatic cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 enhanced K uptake by 14–21%.

Treatment
Elevated [CO 2 ]e0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
14–21%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO 2 ] significantly enhanced K uptake (by 14–21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 did not influence total N uptake.

Treatment
Elevated [CO 2 ]e0
Outcome
uptake of total Ne0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO 2 ] significantly enhanced K uptake (by 14–21%), but did not influence the uptake of total N and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 did not influence P uptake.

Treatment
Elevated [CO 2 ]e0
Outcome
uptake of total N and Pe0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO 2 ] significantly enhanced K uptake (by 14–21%), but did not influence the uptake of total N and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced nutrient harvest index and use efficiency in high-yielding cultivars.

Treatment
elevated [CO 2 ]e0
Outcome
nutrient harvest index and use efficiency valuese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The nutrient harvest index and use efficiency values in HYCs were reduced under elevated [CO 2 ]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced nutrient translocation from source to grain.

Outcome
nutrient translocation from source to sink (grain)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient translocation from source to sink (grain) was significantly reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased alkali spreading value by 10%.

Treatment
[CO 2 ] elevatione0
Outcome
alkali spreading valuee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in alkali spreading value (10%) and reduction in grain protein (2–3%) and iron (5–6%) was also observed upon [CO 2 ] elevation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced grain protein by 2–3%.

Treatment
[CO 2 ] elevatione0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
reductione0
Value
2–3%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in alkali spreading value (10%) and reduction in grain protein (2–3%) and iron (5–6%) was also observed upon [CO 2 ] elevation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced grain iron by 5–6%.

Treatment
[CO 2 ] elevatione0
Outcome
irone0
Direction
reductione0
Value
5–6%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in alkali spreading value (10%) and reduction in grain protein (2–3%) and iron (5–6%) was also observed upon [CO 2 ] elevation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1196 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend increasing N rate for high-yielding cultivars to reduce elevated CO2 harm.

Outcome
increasing N rate for HYCse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient management (increasing N rate for HYCs) and selective breeding of tolerant cultivars in minimizing the adverse effects of elevated [CO 2 ] on rice yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1421 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend breeding tolerant cultivars to reduce elevated CO2 harm.

Outcome
selective breeding of tolerant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selective breeding of tolerant cultivars in minimizing the adverse effects of elevated [CO 2 ] on rice yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1421 · show in text ↑

co2 · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 26 positive, 28 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

co2 · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 131 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

altitude · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.