Paper · 1997 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Growth, grain yield and quality of rice (Oryza sativaL.) in response to elevated CO2and phosphorus nutrition

Saman P. Seneweera; Jann P. Conroy

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
83
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The influence of rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations and phosphorus nutrition on growth, grain yield and quality of a early maturing rice cultivar (Oryza sativa L. cv. Jarrah) was investigated by growing plants in a range of phosphorus levels at either 350 or 700 μL CO2 L−1 in the growth chambers. Total above ground biomass and grain yield were greater at elevated CO2 concentrations and with increasing phosphorus supply. The CO2 response was evident at all but the lowest phosphorus treatments but its magnitude was greater at moderate phosphorus supplies. The increase in grain yield at high CO2 was due mainly to an enhancement of tiller number. The phosphorus concentration in the foliage was unaffected by CO2 enrichment and the critical concentration of 1.8 g kg−1 dwt was the same as reported for field-grown rice. The concentration of calcium in the foliage was increased by high CO2 and the nitrogen concentration was reduced. Chemical analysis (amylose and mineral concentration) indicated that cooked rice grain from high-CO2-grown plants would be firmer and that concentrations of Zn and Fe, which are important in the diet of humans, will be lower. These results indicate that there is a need to plan for the inevitable rise in global CO2 concentrations by selecting cultivars which will be more productive and yet maintain suitable quality characteristics under elevated CO2 levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground biomass was greater under elevated CO2.

Treatment
elevated CO2 concentrationse0
Outcome
Total above ground biomasse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total above ground biomass and grain yield were greater at elevated CO2 concentrations and with increasing phosphorus supply.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was greater under elevated CO2.

Treatment
elevated CO2 concentrationse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total above ground biomass and grain yield were greater at elevated CO2 concentrations and with increasing phosphorus supply.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–426 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground biomass increased with phosphorus supply.

Treatment
increasing phosphorus supplye0
Outcome
Total above ground biomasse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Total above ground biomass and grain yield were greater at elevated CO2 concentrations and with increasing phosphorus supply.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–426 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased with phosphorus supply.

Treatment
increasing phosphorus supplye0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Total above ground biomass and grain yield were greater at elevated CO2 concentrations and with increasing phosphorus supply.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–426 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CO2 response was absent at the lowest phosphorus treatments and greater at moderate supply.

Outcome
CO2 responsee0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
moderate phosphorus suppliese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The CO2 response was evident at all but the lowest phosphorus treatments but its magnitude was greater at moderate phosphorus supplies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–562 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 increased tiller number, accounting for much of the grain yield increase.

Treatment
high CO2e0
Outcome
increase in grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
enhancement of tiller numbere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in grain yield at high CO2 was due mainly to an enhancement of tiller number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment did not change foliage phosphorus concentration.

Treatment
CO2 enrichmente0
Outcome
phosphorus concentration in the foliagee0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The phosphorus concentration in the foliage was unaffected by CO2 enrichment and the critical concentration of 1.8 g kg−1 dwt was the same as reported for field-grown rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–826 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical foliage phosphorus concentration matched the reported field-grown rice value.

Outcome
critical concentratione0
Direction
samee0
Value
1.8 g kg−1 dwte0
Comparator
field-grown ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the critical concentration of 1.8 g kg−1 dwt was the same as reported for field-grown rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 increased foliage calcium concentration.

Treatment
high CO2e0
Outcome
concentration of calcium in the foliagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of calcium in the foliage was increased by high CO2 and the nitrogen concentration was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 reduced foliage nitrogen concentration.

Treatment
high CO2e0
Outcome
nitrogen concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of calcium in the foliage was increased by high CO2 and the nitrogen concentration was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–940 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooked grain from high CO2 plants was predicted to be firmer.

Treatment
high-CO2-grown plantse0
Outcome
cooked rice graine0
Direction
firmere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical analysis (amylose and mineral concentration) indicated that cooked rice grain from high-CO2-grown plants would be firmer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1070 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain zinc and iron concentrations were predicted to be lower under high CO2.

Outcome
concentrations of Zn and Fee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of Zn and Fe, which are important in the diet of humans, will be lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1166 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend selecting cultivars productive under elevated CO2 that maintain quality.

Outcome
selecting cultivarse0
Qualifier
more productive and yet maintain suitable quality characteristics under elevated CO2 levelse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“selecting cultivars which will be more productive and yet maintain suitable quality characteristics under elevated CO2 levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1401 · show in text ↑

co2 · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 26 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

co2 · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 100 positive, 24 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

co2 · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 131 positive, 28 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.