Paper · 2005 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Influence of free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on the eating quality of rice

Tomio Terao; Shu Miura; Tetsuji Yanagihara; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
74
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Rice plants ( Oryza sativa L cv Akitakomachi) were grown under free‐air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) in farmers' fields in Shizukuishi, Iwate, Japan during 1999 and 2000. The grains were harvested and subsequently analyzed for protein and amylose contents as well as the traits related to cooked‐rice viscosity. The cooked rice was also subjected to sensory evaluation. The protein content of rice grains grown under elevated CO 2 was significantly lower than that of rice grown under ambient conditions. In addition, CO 2 enrichment increased the whiteness of the grains in both brown and milled rice and reduced their surface hardness. Although the amylose content of rice grains was unaffected, starch pasting properties demonstrated that rice grains in elevated CO 2 had higher maximum viscosity and breakdown than those grown in ambient conditions. Sensory evaluation of cooked rice with respect to umami (deliciousness), appearance, aroma, hardness, stickiness and overall palatability index indicated that the sensory properties were not significantly altered by the CO 2 enrichment treatment. Therefore, we conclude that the growth of the rice cultivar Akitakomachi under elevated CO 2 concentration decreased the protein content, but did not change the palatability to a level that may be detected by sensory taste panel evaluation. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 significantly lowered grain protein content.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ambient conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content of rice grains grown under elevated CO 2 was significantly lower than that of rice grown under ambient conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment increased brown-rice grain whiteness.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
whiteness of the grains in both brown and milled ricee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 enrichment increased the whiteness of the grains in both brown and milled rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment reduced grain surface hardness.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
surface hardnesse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 enrichment increased the whiteness of the grains in both brown and milled rice and reduced their surface hardness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice grains grown under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment did not affect grain amylose content.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente1
Outcome
amylose contente0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the amylose content of rice grains was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–699 · show in text ↑
e1

“CO 2 enrichment increased the whiteness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice under elevated CO2 had higher maximum starch viscosity than ambient-grown rice.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
maximum viscositye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ambient conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice grains in elevated CO 2 had higher maximum viscosity and breakdown than those grown in ambient conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice under elevated CO2 had higher starch pasting breakdown than ambient-grown rice.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
breakdowne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ambient conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice grains in elevated CO 2 had higher maximum viscosity and breakdown than those grown in ambient conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment did not significantly change cooked-rice sensory properties.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichment treatmente0
Outcome
sensory propertiese0
Direction
not significantly alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sensory properties were not significantly altered by the CO 2 enrichment treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sensory evaluation of cooked rice with respect to umami (deliciousness), appearance, aroma, hardness, stickiness and overall palatability index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1000 · show in text ↑

co2 · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

17 papers: 10 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

co2 · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

co2 · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

co2 · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.