Paper · 2008 · Plant Disease Research

Influence of biocontrol agents on plant growth and white root rot of apple

Saba Banday; Gh. Hassan Dar; Nasreen Fatima

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Oneyear old apple seedlings were inoculated with biocontrol agents i.e. Glomus mosseae (an endomycorrhiza), Laccaria laccata (an ectomycorrhiza) and Trichoderma harzianum (a fungal antagonist) alongwith Dematophora necatrix (white root rot pathogen) individually and in all possible combinations. All the biocontrol agents enhanced plant height, plant diameter, root length and plant biomass in comparison to uninoculated control or D. necatrix-infected plants. However, maximum increase was noticed in treatments where all the biocontrol agents were inoculated together. Among the individual inoculants, G. mosseae exhibited pronounced effects. After 120 days of inoculation, the disease severity in biocontrol agents inoculated seedlings ranged from 18.4 to 44.0 per cent as compared to 71.0 per cent in uninoculated control. Least disease severity was recorded in seedlings inoculated with all the three-biocontrol agents. After 120 days growth, the mycorrhizal root colonization ranged from 20.2 to 43.3 per cent with less mycorrhization in pathogen-inoculated treatments. The acid phosphate activity in apple rhizosphere was significantly higher in mycorrhiza-inoculated seedlings (32.2–54.3 µM “-nitrophenol released/g soil/hr) than non-mycorrhizal ones (14.2–29.4 µM n-nitrophenol released/g soil/hr).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae enhanced apple growth traits versus uninoculated or pathogen infected plants.

Treatment
Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, plant diameter, root length and plant biomasse1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Glomus mosseae (an endomycorrhiza)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the biocontrol agents enhanced plant height, plant diameter, root length and plant biomass in comparison to uninoculated control or D. necatrix-infected plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laccaria laccata enhanced apple growth traits versus uninoculated or pathogen infected plants.

Treatment
Laccaria laccatae0
Interactor
Laccaria laccataLaccaria laccatae0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, plant diameter, root length and plant biomasse1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Laccaria laccata
Laccaria laccata · InteractorStrobilomyces · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Laccaria laccata (an ectomycorrhiza)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the biocontrol agents enhanced plant height, plant diameter, root length and plant biomass in comparison to uninoculated control or D. necatrix-infected plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum enhanced apple growth traits versus uninoculated or pathogen infected plants.

Treatment
Trichoderma harzianume0
Interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant height, plant diameter, root length and plant biomasse1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trichoderma harzianum (a fungal antagonist)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–192 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the biocontrol agents enhanced plant height, plant diameter, root length and plant biomass in comparison to uninoculated control or D. necatrix-infected plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation gave the greatest apple growth increase.

Treatment
all the biocontrol agents were inoculated togethere0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum increase was noticed in treatments where all the biocontrol agents were inoculated together”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among single inoculants, G. mosseae had the most pronounced effects.

Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
pronounced effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the individual inoculants, G. mosseae exhibited pronounced effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol inoculation reduced disease severity relative to the uninoculated control after 120 days.

Treatment
biocontrol agents inoculatede0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Value
18.4 to 44.0 per cente0
Qualifier
71.0 per cente0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“After 120 days of inoculation, the disease severity in biocontrol agents inoculated seedlings ranged from 18.4 to 44.0 per cent as compared to 71.0 per cent in uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculants had the least disease severity.

Treatment
all the three-biocontrol agentse0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
Leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Least disease severity was recorded in seedlings inoculated with all the three-biocontrol agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–924 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization ranged from 20.2 to 43.3 per cent after 120 days.

Outcome
mycorrhizal root colonizatione0
Value
20.2 to 43.3 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“After 120 days growth, the mycorrhizal root colonization ranged from 20.2 to 43.3 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1016 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen inoculation was associated with less mycorrhization.

Treatment
pathogen-inoculated treatmentse0
Interactor
Dematophora necatrixDematophora necatrixe1pathogen
Outcome
mycorrhizatione0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“less mycorrhization in pathogen-inoculated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dematophora necatrix (white root rot pathogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly raised rhizosphere acid phosphate activity.

Treatment
mycorrhiza-inoculatede0
Outcome
acid phosphate activity in apple rhizospheree0
Direction
highere0
Value
32.2–54.3 µM “-nitrophenol released/g soil/hre0
Qualifier
14.2–29.4 µM n-nitrophenol released/g soil/hre0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The acid phosphate activity in apple rhizosphere was significantly higher in mycorrhiza-inoculated seedlings (32.2–54.3 µM “-nitrophenol released/g soil/hr) than non-mycorrhizal ones (14.2–29.4 µM n-nitrophenol released/g soil/hr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1307 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 23 positive, 40 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.