Paper · 2014 · Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences

INFLUENCE OF USING SOME SAFETY MATERIALS ON WATER REQUIREMENT AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF SNAP BEAN PLANT

Usrya A.I. Byan

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during the two successive seasons of 2011/2012 at the Experimental Farm, Kaha station, Qulubia Governorate to study the effect of using four levels of water regime ,i.e. 60%, 80%, 100 and 120% from class A pan evaporation and five safety materials, i.e. water (as control),amino-z, lithovit (a natural intensified CO2 foliar fertilizer ) as foliar spray on snap bean plants as well as the biofertilize mycorrhizal as a seed treatment before sowing and sap material as a absorbent polymer to increase with holding water capacity before sowing and the effect of that on growth, green snap bean yield Poulista cv ., physical and chemical characters as well as water use efficiency. The results indicated that, mycorrhizal seed treatment, lithovit foliar spray and soil treatment with sap material gave the highest values of green pod characters as well as the vegetative growth, in addition all the safety material used led to significant increment on pod yield and the favorable treatments were obtained by using sap material and foliar spray with amino -z. Concerning to using safety materials with water regime levels, it was found that, spraying snap bean plants with amino- z and irrigation with 120% levels from class A pan evaporation was the superior treatment on green pod yield followed by soil treatment with sap material with 60% of water level. Regarding to the mean of green pod weight, the results showed that treating seed with mycorrhizal and 120% level of water regime gave the highest values during the two seasons, then the treatment of foliar spray with lithovite with 80% level of water regime and the treatment by sap soil treatments with supplied by 60% of water irrigation. Concerning to water use efficiency, the data showed that supplied the plants with the highest amount of water 120% and 100% from water irrigation decreased the values of water use efficiency, on the contrary , it can obtained the highest values of water use efficiency from water supplied with 60% then 80% calculated by class A pan evaporation method. Regarding to the effect of safety material on water use efficiency, it was found that, sap treatment or foliar spray with amino-z then, mycorrhizal treatments gave the highest value of water use efficiency. Generally, it can recommend by using sap material of soil addition before sowing and foliar spray by amino- z followed by treating the seeds with mycorrhizal with irrigation level 60% or 80%to obtained the favorable green pod yield and the favorable water use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal seed treatment, lithovit foliar spray and sap material soil treatment gave the highest values of green pod characters and vegetative growth.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
mycorrhizal seed treatment, lithovit foliar spray and soil treatment with sap materiale1
Interactor
mycorrhizale1symbiont
Outcome
green pod characters as well as the vegetative growthe1
Direction
highest valuese1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicated that, mycorrhizal seed treatment, lithovit foliar spray and soil treatment with sap material gave the highest values of green pod characters as well as the vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All safety materials significantly increased pod yield compared with water control.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
all the safety material usede2
Outcome
pod yielde2
Direction
significant incremente2
Comparator
water (as control)e0

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“five safety materials, i.e. water (as control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“in addition all the safety material used led to significant increment on pod yield and the favorable treatments were obtained by using sap material and foliar spray with amino -z”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sap material soil treatment and foliar spray with amino-z were the favorable treatments.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
sap material and foliar spray with amino -ze2
Outcome
favorable treatmentse2
Direction
favorablee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“in addition all the safety material used led to significant increment on pod yield and the favorable treatments were obtained by using sap material and foliar spray with amino -z”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray with amino-z and 120% irrigation was the superior treatment for green pod yield, followed by sap soil treatment with 60% water.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
spraying snap bean plants with amino- z and irrigation with 120% levelse3
Outcome
green pod yielde3
Direction
superiore3
Comparator
soil treatment with sap material with 60% of water levele3

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“spraying snap bean plants with amino- z and irrigation with 120% levels from class A pan evaporation was the superior treatment on green pod yield followed by soil treatment with sap material with 60% of water level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with mycorrhizal and 120% water regime gave the highest mean green pod weight during the two seasons.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
treating seed with mycorrhizal and 120% level of water regimee4
Interactor
mycorrhizale4symbiont
Outcome
mean of green pod weighte4
Direction
highest valuese4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“Regarding to the mean of green pod weight, the results showed that treating seed with mycorrhizal and 120% level of water regime gave the highest values during the two seasons, then the treatment of foliar spray with lithovite with 80% level of water regime and the treatment by sap soil treatments with supplied by 60% of water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray with lithovite at 80% water regime was a further treatment for mean green pod weight.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
foliar spray with lithovite with 80% level of water regimee4
Outcome
mean of green pod weighte4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“Regarding to the mean of green pod weight, the results showed that treating seed with mycorrhizal and 120% level of water regime gave the highest values during the two seasons, then the treatment of foliar spray with lithovite with 80% level of water regime and the treatment by sap soil treatments with supplied by 60% of water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplying the highest water amount (120% and 100%) decreased water use efficiency.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
the highest amount of water 120% and 100% from water irrigatione5
Outcome
water use efficiencye5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e5

“supplied the plants with the highest amount of water 120% and 100% from water irrigation decreased the values of water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1790–1923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water supplied at 60% gave the highest water use efficiency, followed by 80%.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
water supplied with 60%e6
Outcome
water use efficiencye6
Direction
highest valuese6
Comparator
80%e6

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e6

“it can obtained the highest values of water use efficiency from water supplied with 60% then 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1943–2039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sap treatment or foliar spray with amino-z gave the highest value of water use efficiency.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
sap treatment or foliar spray with amino-ze7
Outcome
water use efficiencye7
Direction
highest valuee7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e7

“sap treatment or foliar spray with amino-z then, mycorrhizal treatments gave the highest value of water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2173–2291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal treatments gave the highest value of water use efficiency.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
mycorrhizal treatmentse7
Interactor
mycorrhizale7symbiont
Outcome
water use efficiencye7
Direction
highest valuee7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e7

“sap treatment or foliar spray with amino-z then, mycorrhizal treatments gave the highest value of water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2173–2291 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sap material soil addition and amino-z foliar spray before sowing, followed by mycorrhizal seed treatment at 60% or 80% irrigation, is recommended for favorable pod yield and water use efficiency.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
sap material of soil addition before sowing and foliar spray by amino- ze1
Outcome
favorable green pod yield and the favorable water use efficiencye1

Verbatim

t0

“OF SNAP BEAN PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“it can recommend by using sap material of soil addition before sowing and foliar spray by amino- z followed by treating the seeds with mycorrhizal with irrigation level 60% or 80%to obtained the favorable green pod yield and the favorable water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2304–2563 · show in text ↑

primary amino group · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

application · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 63 positive, 13 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

irrigation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 87 positive, 35 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

118 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

application · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.