Paper · 2003 · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture

Rhizobia and AM Fungal Inoculation Improve Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Bean Plants Under Organic Fertilization

U. K. Aryal; H. L. Xu; M. Fujita

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
38
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Potted bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv speed wonder) plants were grown in a glasshouse with and without organic and chemical fertilizers, un-inoculated or inoculated with rhizobia (a mixed culture of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli and R. tropici) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) (Glomus spp.), singly or in combination. Treatment effects on growth, nodulation, AMF colonization and nutrient uptake of plants were evaluated. Rhizobial inoculation positively influenced root dry weight and nodulation of plants. Shoot and root dry weights and nodulation were again higher in dually inoculated plants compared to singly inoculated plants. Compared to control, single inoculation either with rhizobia or AMF did not increase pod yield. But, dual inoculation significantly increased pod yield compared to control or singly inoculated plants. Inoculation also significantly increased pod yield in organic fertilization treatment, but not in chemical fertilization treatment. AMF colonization, spore population and shoot N and P were also significantly higher in dually inoculated plants. Under fertilized conditions, nodulation, AMF colonization and spore population were generally more pronounced in dually inoculated organic plants than in chemical plants. Shoot Ca, and K remained unaffected by inoculation either in fertilized or unfertilized conditions. Dual inoculation significantly increased the concentration of shoot Mg in organic plants, but not in chemical. In general, better positive effects of inoculations were observed in organic plants than in chemical suggesting higher dependency of organic plants on these symbionts for better growth and development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial inoculation increased root dry weight and nodulation.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
Rhizobial inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobiale0symbiont
Outcome
root dry weight and nodulatione0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobial inoculation positively influenced root dry weight and nodulation of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation raised shoot and root dry weights and nodulation relative to single inoculation.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
dually inoculatede0
Outcome
Shoot and root dry weights and nodulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
singly inoculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot and root dry weights and nodulation were again higher in dually inoculated plants compared to singly inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single rhizobial or AMF inoculation did not increase pod yield relative to control.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
single inoculation either with rhizobia or AMFe0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to control, single inoculation either with rhizobia or AMF did not increase pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation significantly increased pod yield relative to control or single inoculation.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
dual inoculatione0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control or singly inoculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation significantly increased pod yield compared to control or singly inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased pod yield with organic fertilizer.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
organic fertilization treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation also significantly increased pod yield in organic fertilization treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation did not significantly increase pod yield with chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
Beant0
Qualifier
chemical fertilization treatmente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“but not in chemical fertilization treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation significantly increased AMF colonization, spore population, and shoot nitrogen and phosphorus.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
dually inoculatede0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
AMF colonization, spore population and shoot N and Pe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“AMF colonization, spore population and shoot N and P were also significantly higher in dually inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under fertilization, nodulation, AMF colonization, and spore population were more pronounced in dual inoculated organic than chemical plants.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
dually inoculated organic plantse0
Outcome
nodulation, AMF colonization and spore populatione0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
chemical plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Under fertilized conditions, nodulation, AMF colonization and spore population were generally more pronounced in dually inoculated organic plants than in chemical plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation did not affect shoot calcium or potassium in fertilized or unfertilized plants.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Shoot Ca, and Ke0
Direction
remained unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot Ca, and K remained unaffected by inoculation either in fertilized or unfertilized conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation significantly increased shoot magnesium in organic plants.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
Dual inoculatione0
Outcome
concentration of shoot Mge0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
organic plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Dual inoculation significantly increased the concentration of shoot Mg in organic plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation did not increase shoot magnesium in chemically fertilized plants.

Taxon
Beant0
Qualifier
chemicale0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Dual inoculation significantly increased the concentration of shoot Mg in organic plants, but not in chemical.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation effects were generally stronger in organic than chemically fertilized bean plants.

Taxon
Beant0
Outcome
better positive effects of inoculationse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
chemicale0

Verbatim

e0

“In general, better positive effects of inoculations were observed in organic plants than in chemical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

inoculation · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 28 positive, 40 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.