Paper · 1985 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in first, second and third cereal crops

J. G. Buwalda; D. P. Stribley; P. B. Tinker

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed. Fumigation severely reduced natural levels of infection, and slightly reduced yield of above-ground dry matter in both years. In 1981 a decrease in grain yield of about 25% was accompanied by an increase in growth of straw. Plants on fumigated plots contained appreciable amounts of bromine in shoot tissue. Inoculation increased and added P decreased infection in all treatments. In 1980 inoculation had little effect on above-ground dry matter, but it increased concentration of P in shoots especially on plots without added P. In 1981 added inoculum increased yield of grain on fumigated plots by about 0·75 t/ha at all levels of added P, but had little effect on non-fumigated plots, though responses in grain production to added P were similar with and without fumigation. Increases in yield resulting from inoculation were generally accompanied by increases in concentration of P in plant tissue. Winter barley was sown on the plots after their use for spring wheat, without further application of the fumigation, inoculation or phosphorus treatments used in those experiments, to determine any residual effects on mycorrhizal infection and on growth. The levels of mycorrhizal infection on non-fumigated, inoculated plots were relatively constant in successive crops, although numbers of propagules of mycorrhizal fungi increased significantly with time for all treatments. Infection levels on fumigated and non-inoculated plots increased in successive crops, so that the relative effects of fumigation and of inoculation declined with time. The effects of inoculation on infection levels persisted for longer than those on yields, suggesting that maximum effects of mycorrhizal infection on growth did not require the maximum levels of infection found in the roots. Harvest yields continued to respond to applied phosphorus even when uniformly high levels of infection had been established, suggesting that the ability of the root system to absorb phosphate was not greatly increased by mycorrhizal infection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation of soil with methyl bromide severely reduced natural levels of mycorrhizal infection in wheat.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fumigation of soil with methyl bromidee0
Outcome
infectione1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
natural levelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fumigation severely reduced natural levels of infection, and slightly reduced yield of above-ground dry matter in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation slightly reduced above-ground dry matter yield of wheat in both years.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fumigation of soil with methyl bromidee0
Outcome
yield of above-ground dry mattere1
Direction
slightly reducede1
Qualifier
in both yearse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fumigation severely reduced natural levels of infection, and slightly reduced yield of above-ground dry matter in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–568 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1981 a decrease in grain yield of about 25% was associated with an increase in straw growth.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
graine2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
decreasee2
Value
about 25%e2
Qualifier
In 1981e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 1981 a decrease in grain yield of about 25% was accompanied by an increase in growth of straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–666 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1981 an increase in straw growth accompanied the decrease in grain yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
strawe2
Outcome
growth of strawe2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
In 1981e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 1981 a decrease in grain yield of about 25% was accompanied by an increase in growth of straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plants on fumigated plots contained appreciable amounts of bromine in shoot tissue.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
shoot tissuee3
Outcome
appreciable amounts of brominee3
Qualifier
on fumigated plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plants on fumigated plots contained appreciable amounts of bromine in shoot tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Olomics mosseae increased mycorrhizal infection in all treatments.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseaee0
Interactor
Olomics mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
infectione4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
in all treatmentse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e4

“Inoculation increased and added P decreased infection in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added P decreased mycorrhizal infection in all treatments.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
added Pe4
Interactor
Olomics mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
infectione4
Direction
decreasede4
Qualifier
in all treatmentse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e4

“Inoculation increased and added P decreased infection in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1980 inoculation had little effect on above-ground dry matter of wheat.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
inoculatione5
Interactor
Olomics mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
above-ground dry mattere5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Qualifier
In 1980e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 1980 inoculation had little effect on above-ground dry matter, but it increased concentration of P in shoots especially on plots without added P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1980 inoculation increased P concentration in wheat shoots, especially on plots without added P.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
inoculatione5
Interactor
Olomics mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
concentration of P in shootse5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
especially on plots without added Pe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 1980 inoculation had little effect on above-ground dry matter, but it increased concentration of P in shoots especially on plots without added P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1981 added inoculum increased grain yield on fumigated plots by about 0.75 t/ha at all levels of added P.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
added inoculume6
Interactor
Olomics mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
yield of graine6
Direction
increasede6
Value
0·75 t/hae6
Qualifier
at all levels of added Pe6
Setting
fumigated plotse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e6

“In 1981 added inoculum increased yield of grain on fumigated plots by about 0·75 t/ha at all levels of added P, but had little effect on non-fumigated plots, though responses in grain production to added P were similar with and without fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1981 added inoculum had little effect on grain yield on non-fumigated plots.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
added inoculume6
Interactor
Olomics mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
yield of graine6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Setting
non-fumigated plotse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e6

“In 1981 added inoculum increased yield of grain on fumigated plots by about 0·75 t/ha at all levels of added P, but had little effect on non-fumigated plots, though responses in grain production to added P were similar with and without fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain production responses to added P were similar with and without fumigation.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
added Pe6
Outcome
responses in grain production to added Pe6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Comparator
without fumigatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e6

“In 1981 added inoculum increased yield of grain on fumigated plots by about 0·75 t/ha at all levels of added P, but had little effect on non-fumigated plots, though responses in grain production to added P were similar with and without fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1220 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increases in wheat yield from inoculation were generally accompanied by increases in P concentration in plant tissue.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
inoculatione7
Outcome
concentration of P in plant tissuee7
Direction
increasese7
Qualifier
generally accompaniede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e7

“Increases in yield resulting from inoculation were generally accompanied by increases in concentration of P in plant tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1345 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal infection levels on non-fumigated, inoculated plots were relatively constant in successive crops.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
levels of mycorrhizal infectione1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
in successive cropse1
Setting
non-fumigated, inoculated plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e1

“The levels of mycorrhizal infection on non-fumigated, inoculated plots were relatively constant in successive crops, although numbers of propagules of mycorrhizal fungi increased significantly with time for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1823 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Numbers of mycorrhizal fungal propagules increased significantly with time for all treatments.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
numbers of propagules of mycorrhizal fungie1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
with time for all treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e1

“The levels of mycorrhizal infection on non-fumigated, inoculated plots were relatively constant in successive crops, although numbers of propagules of mycorrhizal fungi increased significantly with time for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1823 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection levels on fumigated and non-inoculated plots increased in successive crops.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
Infection levelse2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
in successive cropse2
Setting
fumigated and non-inoculated plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e2

“Infection levels on fumigated and non-inoculated plots increased in successive crops, so that the relative effects of fumigation and of inoculation declined with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–1991 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative effects of fumigation and of inoculation declined with time.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fumigatione2
Outcome
the relative effects of fumigation and of inoculatione2
Direction
declinede2
Qualifier
with timee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e2

“Infection levels on fumigated and non-inoculated plots increased in successive crops, so that the relative effects of fumigation and of inoculation declined with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–1991 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effects of inoculation on infection levels persisted for longer than effects on yields.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
inoculatione3
Outcome
effects of inoculation on infection levelse3
Direction
persisted for longere3
Comparator
those on yieldse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e3

“The effects of inoculation on infection levels persisted for longer than those on yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1993–2081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest yields continued to respond to applied phosphorus even when uniformly high levels of infection had been established.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
applied phosphoruse4
Outcome
Harvest yieldse4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Qualifier
even when uniformly high levels of infection had been establishede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of inoculation with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Olomics mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann and Trappe, fumigation of soil with methyl bromide, and addition of superphosphate (up to 60 kg P/ha) on growth and phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Highbury) were investigated in two experiments (in 1980 and 1981 respectively) on plots that had been fallowed and recently limed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–442 · show in text ↑
e4

“Harvest yields continued to respond to applied phosphorus even when uniformly high levels of infection had been established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2218–2341 · show in text ↑

bromomethane · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

solarization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

inoculation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

164 papers: 104 positive, 60 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 476 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.