Paper · 1999 · Plant Pathology

Fusarium ear blight of wheat: the use of quantitative PCR and visual disease assessment in studies of disease control

Doohan; Parry; Nicholson

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
62
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Quantitative PCR analysis and visual disease assessment (VDA) were used to study Fusarium culmorum and F. poae ear blight of wheat and its fungicidal control in three glasshouse trials (1994–5 and 1996–7). VDA indicated high levels of both diseases in the trials, while PCR analysis showed that the amounts of F. poae detected in infected plants were low relative to the amounts detected for F. culmorum . PCR and VDA analysis both indicated that the demethylase‐inhibiting (DMI) fungicides prochloraz and tebuconazole significantly decreased F. culmorum and F. poae ear blight. The PCR results, however, revealed levels of disease control by fungicide treatments that were consistently higher than those suggested by VDA. Overall, both fungicides appeared equally effective in controlling the two pathogens. PCR and VDA analysis indicated that the anilino‐pyrimidine fungicide pyrimethanil had no significant effect on F. culmorum ear blight. Correlations between VDA at cereal growth stage 80 and PCR analysis were similar for F. culmorum and F. poae . Yield analysis, as measured by 1000 grain weight, indicated that DNA content more accurately predicted yield loss than did VDA scores. Inoculation with F. culmorum significantly reduced yield and significant relationships were observed between F. culmorum disease (as assessed visually or by PCR) and yield, with yield decreasing as disease increased. In contrast, inoculation with F. poae had no significant effect on yield and no significant relationships were observed between F. poae disease and yield. These results have important implications for field studies of Fusarium ear blight of wheat because they highlight the importance of identification of the causal organisms to the species level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prochloraz and tebuconazole significantly decreased F. culmorum ear blight in wheat.

Treatment
prochloraz and tebuconazolee0
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume0pathogen
Outcome
ear blighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“prochloraz and tebuconazole significantly decreased F. culmorum and F. poae ear blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prochloraz and tebuconazole significantly decreased F. poae ear blight in wheat.

Treatment
prochloraz and tebuconazolee0
Interactor
F. poaeFusarium poaee0pathogen
Outcome
ear blighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium poae
Fusarium poae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“prochloraz and tebuconazole significantly decreased F. culmorum and F. poae ear blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrimethanil had no significant effect on F. culmorum ear blight in wheat.

Treatment
pyrimethanile2
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume2pathogen
Outcome
ear blighte2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e2

“pyrimethanil had no significant effect on F. culmorum ear blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–942 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PCR results showed higher levels of disease control by fungicide treatments than those suggested by VDA.

Treatment
fungicide treatmentse3
Outcome
levels of disease controle3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
those suggested by VDAe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e3

“The PCR results, however, revealed levels of disease control by fungicide treatments that were consistently higher than those suggested by VDA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fungicides were equally effective in controlling the two pathogens.

Treatment
both fungicidese1
Outcome
effective in controlling the two pathogense1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Overall, both fungicides appeared equally effective in controlling the two pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–807 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Correlations between VDA and PCR analysis were similar for F. culmorum and F. poae.

Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume1pathogen
Second interactor
F. poaeFusarium poaee1pathogen
Outcome
Correlations between VDA at cereal growth stage 80 and PCR analysise1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium poae
Fusarium poae · Second interactorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Correlations between VDA at cereal growth stage 80 and PCR analysis were similar for F. culmorum and F. poae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1052 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DNA content more accurately predicted yield loss than VDA scores.

Outcome
yield losse4
Direction
more accurately predictede4
Comparator
VDA scorese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e4

“Yield analysis, as measured by 1000 grain weight, indicated that DNA content more accurately predicted yield loss than did VDA scores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with F. culmorum significantly reduced wheat yield.

Treatment
Inoculation with F. culmorume5
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume5pathogen
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e5

“Inoculation with F. culmorum significantly reduced yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1246 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield decreased as F. culmorum disease increased, a significant relationship.

Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume6pathogen
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
decreasinge6
Qualifier
as disease increasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e6

“significant relationships were observed between F. culmorum disease (as assessed visually or by PCR) and yield, with yield decreasing as disease increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with F. poae had no significant effect on wheat yield.

Treatment
inoculation with F. poaee7
Interactor
F. poaeFusarium poaee7pathogen
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium poae
Fusarium poae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e7

“inoculation with F. poae had no significant effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1479 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant relationship was observed between F. poae disease and wheat yield.

Interactor
F. poaeFusarium poaee2pathogen
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Qualifier
no significant relationshipse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium poae
Fusarium poae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium ear blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e2

“no significant relationships were observed between F. poae disease and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1560 · show in text ↑

tebuconazole · Fusarium poae · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Fusarium poae · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

prochloraz · Fusarium culmorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tebuconazole · Fusarium culmorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Fusarium culmorum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 549 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.