Paper · 2003 · Biologia Plantarum

Nitrate Reductase in Wheat Plants Grown Under Water Stress and Inoculated with Azospirillum spp.

H.M. El-Komy; M.A. Hamdia; G.K. Abd El-Baki

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
68
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation has been performed to evaluate nitrate reductase (NR) and nitrogenase activities as well as growth and mineral nutrition of wheat plants grown under drought stress and inoculated with different Azospirillum strains (NR- and NR+). Fresh, dry mass and water content decreased with decreasing soil moisture content, which was accompanied with low soluble sugars and soluble protein content and increase in the total amino acids content. Azospirillum inoculation with either bacterial strain (NR- and NR+) significantly increased the above characteristics even at 40 % moisture content. NR activity decreased in both the shoots and roots by decreasing soil moisture content. NR+ strain exhibited increased root NR activity compared with uninoculated plants or inoculated with NR- strain. However, plants inoculated with NR-strain increased NR activity in the shoot more than in the root of the same plant and in the shoot of control plants. Inoculation with either NR- and NR+ Azospirillum strains gave higher nitrogenase activity than uninoculated control plants. The low N supply (0.5 mM) did not affect nitrogenase activity. NR-strain was less effective than NR+strain in promoting total N-yield, spike numbers and their mass per pot. Azospirillum inoculation exhibited no significant changes in wheat Mg2+ content. However, K+ and Ca2+ have shown significantly increased values. Azospirillum beneficial effect on plant N balance and growth are most probably composed of multiple mechanisms and beneficial NR is one of them. The importance of Azospirillum NR+strains for increasing wheat resistance to water stress is also supported by the obtained data.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower soil moisture decreased fresh and dry mass and water content.

Treatment
decreasing soil moisture contente0
Outcome
Fresh, dry mass and water contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh, dry mass and water content decreased with decreasing soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower moisture accompanied low soluble sugars and protein.

Treatment
decreasing soil moisture contente0
Outcome
soluble sugars and soluble protein contente0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing soil moisture content, which was accompanied with low soluble sugars and soluble protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower moisture accompanied increased total amino acids.

Treatment
decreasing soil moisture contente0
Outcome
total amino acids contente0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing soil moisture content, which was accompanied with low soluble sugars and soluble protein content and increase in the total amino acids content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Either Azospirillum strain increased growth and nutrition characteristics even at 40% moisture.

Treatment
Azospirillum inoculatione0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
above characteristicse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azospirillum inoculation with either bacterial strain (NR- and NR+) significantly increased the above characteristics even at 40 % moisture content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NR activity fell in shoots and roots as soil moisture fell.

Organ / stage
shoots and rootse0
Treatment
decreasing soil moisture contente0
Gene
NRe0
Outcome
NR activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NR activity decreased in both the shoots and roots by decreasing soil moisture content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NR+ inoculation increased root NR activity compared with uninoculated or NR- inoculated plants.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
NR+ straine0
Interactor
NR+ straine0symbiont
Gene
NRe0
Outcome
root NR activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated plants or inoculated with NR- straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NR+ strain exhibited increased root NR activity compared with uninoculated plants or inoculated with NR- strain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NR- strain increased shoot NR activity versus root and control shoots.

Treatment
NR-straine0
Interactor
NR-straine0symbiont
Gene
NRe0
Outcome
NR activity in the shoote0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
root of the same plant and in the shoot of control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants inoculated with NR-strain increased NR activity in the shoot more than in the root of the same plant and in the shoot of control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both strains raised nitrogenase activity over uninoculated controls.

Treatment
Inoculation with either NR- and NR+ Azospirillum strainse0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Gene
nitrogenasee0
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with either NR- and NR+ Azospirillum strains gave higher nitrogenase activity than uninoculated control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N supply did not affect nitrogenase activity.

Treatment
low N supply (0.5 mM)e0
Gene
nitrogenasee0
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The low N supply (0.5 mM) did not affect nitrogenase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NR- strain promoted total N yield, spike number and mass less than NR+.

Treatment
NR-straine0
Interactor
NR-straine0symbiont
Outcome
total N-yield, spike numbers and their mass per pote0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
NR+straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NR-strain was less effective than NR+strain in promoting total N-yield, spike numbers and their mass per pot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum inoculation did not significantly change wheat Mg2+ content.

Treatment
Azospirillum inoculatione0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
wheat Mg2+ contente0
Direction
no significant changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azospirillum inoculation exhibited no significant changes in wheat Mg2+ content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum inoculation significantly raised K+ and Ca2+ values.

Outcome
K+ and Ca2+e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, K+ and Ca2+ have shown significantly increased values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azospirillum · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 40 positive, 8 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
    Nitrogen deficiency did not stimulate root protease activity.

    Do plants use root-derived proteases to promote the uptake of soil organic nitrogen? · 2020 · compared with with and without inorganic N

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.