Paper · 1985 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae of winter and spring cereals

J. G. Buwalda; D. P. Stribley; P. B. Tinker

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The importance of mycorrhizal infection for the growth of wheat and barley sown in winter and spring was assessed in two field experiments. Low temperatures during winter restricted the development of mycorrhizal infection, and calculations of ‘thermal time’ indicated that the percentage of root length infected did not increase when mean temperatures were less than 5 °C. Hence infection was less in the winter-sown crops than in the spring-sown crops at early stages of plant development. However, the effects of mycorrhizal infection on growth were greater in winter-sown than in spring-sown wheat. At all levels of applied phosphorus up to 60 kg P/ha, artificial inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi increased the yields of both cereals at each sowing date by 17–25% after indigenous mycorrhizal fungi had been removed by fumigation, but the effects were smaller on non-fumigated plots. The results confirmed the potential importance of mycorrhizal infection for the growth of cereals. Mycorrhizal infection increased the phosphorus concentration in the plant tissue at very early stages of growth, but the effect generally declined with time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter temperatures restricted mycorrhizal infection development.

Treatment
Low temperatures during wintere0
Interactor
mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
development of mycorrhizal infectione0
Direction
restrictede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low temperatures during winter restricted the development of mycorrhizal infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–230 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of wheat and barley sown in winter and spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length infection did not rise below mean temperatures of 5 °C.

Treatment
mean temperatures were less than 5 °Ce0
Interactor
mycorrhizale2symbiont
Outcome
percentage of root length infectede0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of root length infected did not increase when mean temperatures were less than 5 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–380 · show in text ↑
e2

“Low temperatures during winter restricted the development of mycorrhizal infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–230 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of wheat and barley sown in winter and spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early infection was lower in winter-sown than spring-sown cereal crops.

Interactor
mycorrhizale2symbiont
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
early stages of plant developmente0
Comparator
spring-sown cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infection was less in the winter-sown crops than in the spring-sown crops at early stages of plant development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“Low temperatures during winter restricted the development of mycorrhizal infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–230 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of wheat and barley sown in winter and spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal effects on wheat growth were greater in winter-sown than spring-sown crops.

Interactor
mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
effects of mycorrhizal infection on growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
spring-sown wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mycorrhizal infection on growth were greater in winter-sown than in spring-sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased wheat yield by 17–25% in fumigated plots at both sowing dates and phosphorus levels up to 60 kg P/ha.

Treatment
artificial inoculation with mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17–25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“artificial inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi increased the yields of both cereals at each sowing date by 17–25% after indigenous mycorrhizal fungi had been removed by fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of wheat and barley sown in winter and spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased barley yield by 17–25% in fumigated plots.

Treatment
artificial inoculation with mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17–25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“artificial inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi increased the yields of both cereals at each sowing date by 17–25% after indigenous mycorrhizal fungi had been removed by fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of wheat and barley sown in winter and spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculation yield effect was smaller in non-fumigated plots.

Outcome
effectse0
Direction
smallere0
Qualifier
non-fumigated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects were smaller on non-fumigated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of wheat and barley sown in winter and spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal infection raised cereal tissue phosphorus concentration very early in growth.

Organ / stage
very early stages of growthe0
Interactor
Mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
phosphorus concentration in the plant tissuee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal infection increased the phosphorus concentration in the plant tissue at very early stages of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1108 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of wheat and barley sown in winter and spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of mycorrhizal infection on tissue phosphorus generally declined over time.

Outcome
effecte0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
with timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect generally declined with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1153 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of wheat and barley sown in winter and spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–108 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
    Inoculated barley yielded less than sprayed barley.

    Analysis of the Effects of Erysiphe graminis DC. on the Growth of Barley · 1962 · compared with barley repeatedly sprayed with lime sulphur

    Opposite direction

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 95 positive, 8 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.