Paper · 2001 · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

A comparative study on the effect of chilling treatment in the light and in the dark on subsequent photosynthesis in cucumber

Sung-Soo Jun; Jong Min Kim; Chin Bum Lee

18
claims
39
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The adverse effect of chilling treatment (4°C) in the light and dark on the subsequent photosynthesis was compared by measuring O 2 evolution and modulated chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants. Weak light (50 mol m –2 s –1) was adopted for light chilling to discount the photoinhibitory effect, which was substantiated by no decline in the ratio variable/maximal fluorescence after dark adaptation ( F v / F m) after light chilling. The inhibitory pace was faster in the light. Decrease in photosynthesis was not prominent for the initial 2 h of chilling in the light or 12 h of chilling in the dark, but was manifested as an abrupt drop thereafter. Approximately 50 and 90% inhibition of O 2 evolution was observed after chilling for 4 and 6 h, respectively, in the light, but the same degree of inhibition was shown only after 24 and 48 h of chilling in the dark. Chl fluorescence measurement showed no significant change in initial fluorescence ( F o ) and F v / F m but notable change in quenching parameters. Chloroplasts isolated from either 4-h light-chilled or 24-h dark-chilled plants showed roughly 50% reduction in CO 2 fixation. Results with reconstituted chloroplasts revealed damage in thylakoids from light-chilled plants. In contrast, stroma from dark-chilled plants was less functional. Electron transport was hampered only in light-chilled plants with most lesions residing in photosystem I (PSI). Separation of photosynthates showed changes in metabolite distribution, but more substantially in the dark-chilled chloroplasts, indicating that stromal enzymes were affected. These results suggest that chilling-stress in the light primarily interferes with thylakoidal function while that in the dark mostly affects stromal function within the chloroplasts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling in the light inhibited photosynthesis faster than chilling in the dark.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse2
Treatment
chilling treatment (4°C) in the lighte0
Outcome
inhibitory pacee1
Direction
fastere1
Comparator
darke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adverse effect of chilling treatment (4°C) in the light and dark on the subsequent photosynthesis was compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The inhibitory pace was faster in the light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–544 · show in text ↑
e2

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling in the light for 4 h caused about 50% inhibition of O2 evolution.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
in the lighte0
Outcome
inhibition of O 2 evolutione0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately 50 and 90% inhibition of O 2 evolution was observed after chilling for 4 and 6 h, respectively, in the light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling in the light for 6 h caused about 90% inhibition of O2 evolution.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
in the lighte0
Outcome
inhibition of O 2 evolutione0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately 50 and 90% inhibition of O 2 evolution was observed after chilling for 4 and 6 h, respectively, in the light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling in the dark for 24 h caused about 50% inhibition of O2 evolution.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse2
Treatment
chilling in the darke1
Outcome
inhibition of O 2 evolutione0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately 50 and 90% inhibition of O 2 evolution was observed after chilling for 4 and 6 h, respectively, in the light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“the same degree of inhibition was shown only after 24 and 48 h of chilling in the dark”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–932 · show in text ↑
e2

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling in the dark for 48 h caused about 90% inhibition of O2 evolution.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse2
Treatment
chilling in the darke1
Outcome
inhibition of O 2 evolutione0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately 50 and 90% inhibition of O 2 evolution was observed after chilling for 4 and 6 h, respectively, in the light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“the same degree of inhibition was shown only after 24 and 48 h of chilling in the dark”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–932 · show in text ↑
e2

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light chilling caused no decline in the Fv/Fm ratio after dark adaptation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
light chillinge0
Outcome
ratio variable/maximal fluorescencee0
Direction
no declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substantiated by no decline in the ratio variable/maximal fluorescence after dark adaptation ( F v / F m) after light chilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–499 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling did not significantly change initial fluorescence (Fo) or Fv/Fm.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
initial fluorescencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chl fluorescence measurement showed no significant change in initial fluorescence ( F o ) and F v / F m but notable change in quenching parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1080 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling produced a notable change in fluorescence quenching parameters.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
quenching parameterse0
Direction
notable changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chl fluorescence measurement showed no significant change in initial fluorescence ( F o ) and F v / F m but notable change in quenching parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1080 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloroplasts from 4-h light-chilled plants showed roughly 50% reduction in CO2 fixation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
4-h light-chillede0
Outcome
CO 2 fixatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
roughly 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chloroplasts isolated from either 4-h light-chilled or 24-h dark-chilled plants showed roughly 50% reduction in CO 2 fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1207 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloroplasts from 24-h dark-chilled plants showed roughly 50% reduction in CO2 fixation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
24-h dark-chillede0
Outcome
CO 2 fixatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
roughly 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chloroplasts isolated from either 4-h light-chilled or 24-h dark-chilled plants showed roughly 50% reduction in CO 2 fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1207 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reconstituted chloroplasts from light-chilled plants showed damage in thylakoids.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
light-chilled plantse0
Outcome
damage in thylakoidse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results with reconstituted chloroplasts revealed damage in thylakoids from light-chilled plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1304 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stroma from dark-chilled plants was less functional.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
dark-chilled plantse0
Outcome
stromae0
Direction
less functionale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, stroma from dark-chilled plants was less functional”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1370 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport was hampered only in light-chilled plants, with lesions mostly in photosystem I.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
light-chilled plantse0
Outcome
Electron transporte0
Direction
hamperede0
Qualifier
lesions residing in photosystem I (PSI)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Electron transport was hampered only in light-chilled plants with most lesions residing in photosystem I (PSI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1482 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark-chilled chloroplasts showed changes in metabolite distribution, more substantial than in light-chilled chloroplasts.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
dark-chilled chloroplastse0
Outcome
metabolite distributione0
Direction
changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Separation of photosynthates showed changes in metabolite distribution, but more substantially in the dark-chilled chloroplasts, indicating that stromal enzymes were affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1658 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that light chilling mainly interferes with thylakoid function.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
thylakoidal functione0
Qualifier
chilling-stress in the lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that chilling-stress in the light primarily interferes with thylakoidal function while that in the dark mostly affects stromal function within the chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1841 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that dark chilling mainly affects stromal function.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
stromal functione0
Qualifier
that in the darke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that chilling-stress in the light primarily interferes with thylakoidal function while that in the dark mostly affects stromal function within the chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1841 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that stromal enzymes were affected in dark-chilled chloroplasts.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
stromal enzymese0
Qualifier
dark-chilled chloroplastse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Separation of photosynthates showed changes in metabolite distribution, but more substantially in the dark-chilled chloroplasts, indicating that stromal enzymes were affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1658 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in photosynthesis during chilling in the light was not prominent for the initial 2 h.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
chilling in the lighte0
Outcome
Decrease in photosynthesise0
Direction
not prominente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decrease in photosynthesis was not prominent for the initial 2 h of chilling in the light or 12 h of chilling in the dark, but was manifested as an abrupt drop thereafter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–716 · show in text ↑
e1

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 · show in text ↑

cold · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

39 papers: 6 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

light · pest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cold · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

light · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 30 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.