Paper · 1994 · jpa

Selected Pre‐emergent Herbicides and Soil pH Effect on Seedling Blight of Grain Sorghum

Mark A. Davis; Douglas J. Jardine; Timothy C. Todd

17
claims
33
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Establishment of grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] can be a problem in central and south central Kansas. Studies were conducted in 1989 and 1990 to determine the influence of soil pH, pre‐emergent herbicides, and Fusarium spp. on seedling blight, plant population, and yield of grain sorghum in south central Kansas. A split‐plot experiment with soil pH as main plots and herbicide treatments as subplots was established in both a wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)‐grain sorghum (WGS) rotation and a grain sorghum‐grain sorghum rotation (CSGS). There were no interactions between soil pH and herbicide for any of the variables. Fusarium graminearum was the primary pathogen isolated from the roots of seedling grain sorghum plants. The rate of infection at the lowest pH decreased over time in 1989, but increased over time in 1990. Fusarium graminearum isolation frequencies from the roots of seedling grain sorghum plants were significantly higher at the lowest soil pH levels regardless of year or rotation. Secondary root development was signficantly less at the lowest soil pH level in both 1989 rotations and the 1990 GSGS rotation and did not change over time. In the 1990 WGS rotation, the rate of secondary root development had a greater increase at pH 6.3 than at pH 5.9 or 4.7. Secondary root development was significantly higher at pH 5.9 than at pH 6.3 at 14 d but there were no differences among the treatments by 25 d after planting. No differences in plant population or yield were detected due to soil pH in either year or either rotation except plant population was significantly ess at the lowest soil pH in the 1990 WGS rotation. Fusarium graminearum isolation frequencies from the roots were significantly higher when alachlor plus atrazine, metolachlor lus atrazine or atrazine alone was used compared with a watertreated control regardless of year or rotation. In addition, F. graminearum isolation frequencies were significantly higher from the alachlor plus atrazine treatment than in the two other herbicide treatments. Except for the 1989 WGS rotation this response decreased over time following planting. Secondary root development paralleled root infection with the least root development occurring in the alachlor plus atrazine treatment at the earliest sampling dates regardless of year or rotation. This response decreased over time following planting. There were no significant differences in plant population or yield due to soil pH except there was a significantly lower plant population at pH 4.7 in the 1990 WGS rotation. Alachlor plus atrazine significantly reduced stands in both rotations in both years. There was no difference in yield among herbicide treatments. Research Question Seedling blights cause Kansas grain sorghum producers to replant ≈2% of the grain sorghum acreage each year. Most seedling blight problems occur in central and southcentral Kansas where soil pH is generally low (often <5.0) and sorghum is grown either continuously or in rotation with wheat. Sorghum is planted in early to mid‐June and the most common herbicide programs are pre‐emergent applications of atrazine, alachlor plus atrazine, or metolachlor plus atrazine. Fusarium graminearum is the primary pathogen isolated from diseased roots. The objective of this research was to determine the role of soil pH and pre‐emergent herbicides in seedling blight development on grain sorghum caused by F. graminearum . Literature Summary The establishment of acceptable grain sorghum stands has been a problem since the 1940s. Fusarium spp. damage to the root systems of some sorghum cultivars grown in low pH (4.7) soil in southcentral Kansas has been reported. Acidic soils are also associated with increased levels of F. graminearum in the roots of corn and wheat. Numerous reviews have been published on the ability of some herbicides to increase plant disease. A South African study reported that atrazine, propachlor, and propachlor plus propazine all increased seedling blight severity on grain sorghum, but the pathogen(s) involved were never identified. Study Description Field studies were conducted in 1989 and 1990. Soil: Lady Smith silty clay loam Previous crop: wheat or sorghum Main plots: Soil pH: 1989 (wheat‐grain sorghum [WGS] and grain sorghum‐grain sorghum [GSGS] rotations), 5.1, 5.7, 6.1; 1990 (WGS), 4.7, 5.9, 6.3; 1990 (GSGS), 4.8, 6.0, 6.5 Subplots: water control, atrazine, atrazine + alachlor + flurazole, atrazine + metolachlor + CGA‐92194 Measurements: Emergence, percentage root infection, secondary root development, yield Applied Questions Are grain sorghum plants more susceptible to Fusarium seedling blight under acid soil conditions? The highest percentage root infection and poorest secondary root development occurred at the lowest soil pH in both years. By the final sampling date (5–6 wk after planting), significant differences in root infection and secondary root development remained only at the lowest pH level. This effect was independent of rotation. The only significant decrease in emergence occurred in the 1990 WGS rotation at pH 4.7. There were no differences in yield in either year. Can pre‐emergent herbicides increase the susceptibility of grain sorghum to seedling blight caused by F. graminearum? The percentage of Fusarium root infection was significantly higher for all herbicide treatments compared with the water‐treated control in both rotations and in both years. This effect was still present after 6 wk for all treatments except atrazine in the GSGS rotation in 1989 and for all treatments in both rotations after 4 wk in 1990. Only the alachlor plus atrazine treatment in the WGS rotation still had an increased percentage of root infection after 5 wk in 1990. All herbicide treatments caused significant reductions in secondary root development 2 wk after emergence in both rotations and in both years. By 6 wk after planting in 1989, root development was similar to the no herbicide control for all treatments except the alachlor plus atrazine treatment. Root development was not significantly different among any of the treatments in either rotation by 5 wk after planting in 1990. The alachlor plus atrazine treatment significantly reduced plant population in both rotations in both years. In addition, the metolachlor plus atrazine treatment reduced plant populations in the WGS rotation in 1990. There were no differences in yield among the treatments in either rotation in either year. Recommendations Grain sorghum stand establishment problems in Kansas appear to be caused by several factors that may be additive. Low pH, hybrids sensitive to herbicide and safener stress, and F. graminearum can reduce root function, resulting in slow growth of plants. Under severe conditions, plants die. Rotation, with either wheat or grain sorghum, did not affect stand improvement. Our results suggest those sorghum plants that survive these initial stresses will eventually produce a near normal root system, with little or no effect on final yield. Therefore, much of the current replanting is probably unnecessary. Management recommendations for this problem would include liming soils to a pH of 6.0 or higher, the use of hybrids more tolerant to acid amide herbicides, or the replacement of pre‐emergent herbicides with post‐emergent ones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium graminearum was the main pathogen isolated from sorghum seedling roots.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
primary pathogen isolated from the rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium graminearum was the primary pathogen isolated from the roots of seedling grain sorghum plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–737 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low soil pH was associated with greater Fusarium root isolation frequency.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
lowest soil pH levelse0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium graminearum isolation frequencies from the rootse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium graminearum isolation frequencies from the roots of seedling grain sorghum plants were significantly higher at the lowest soil pH levels regardless of year or rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1016 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Secondary root development was lower at the lowest pH in the specified rotations.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
lowest soil pH levele0
Outcome
Secondary root developmente0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Secondary root development was signficantly less at the lowest soil pH level in both 1989 rotations and the 1990 GSGS rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1990 WGS, secondary root development increased more at pH 6.3 than at pH 5.9 or 4.7.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
pH 6.3e0
Outcome
rate of secondary root developmente0
Direction
greater increasee0
Comparator
pH 5.9 or 4.7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of secondary root development had a greater increase at pH 6.3 than at pH 5.9 or 4.7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 14 days, root development was higher at pH 5.9 than at 6.3.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
pH 5.9e0
Outcome
Secondary root developmente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
14 de0
Comparator
pH 6.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Secondary root development was significantly higher at pH 5.9 than at pH 6.3 at 14 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1380 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 25 days, root development did not differ among pH treatments.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Secondary root developmente1
Direction
no differencese0
Qualifier
25 d after plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no differences among the treatments by 25 d after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“Secondary root development was significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1347 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At low pH in 1990 WGS, sorghum plant population was lower.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
lowest soil pHe0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Direction
esse0
Qualifier
1990 WGS rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant population was significantly ess at the lowest soil pH in the 1990 WGS rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments increased Fusarium root isolation compared with water control.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
alachlor plus atrazine, metolachlor lus atrazine or atrazine alonee0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium graminearum isolation frequencies from the rootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
watertreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium graminearum isolation frequencies from the roots were significantly higher when alachlor plus atrazine, metolachlor lus atrazine or atrazine alone was used compared with a watertreated control regardless of year or rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor plus atrazine gave higher Fusarium isolation than the other herbicide treatments.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
alachlor plus atrazinee0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
F. graminearum isolation frequenciese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
two other herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. graminearum isolation frequencies were significantly higher from the alachlor plus atrazine treatment than in the two other herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2051 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root development was least under alachlor plus atrazine at early sampling.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
alachlor plus atrazinee0
Outcome
root developmente0
Direction
leaste0
Qualifier
earliest sampling datese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“least root development occurring in the alachlor plus atrazine treatment at the earliest sampling dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2202–2305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor plus atrazine reduced stands in both rotations and years.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Alachlor plus atrazinee0
Outcome
standse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alachlor plus atrazine significantly reduced stands in both rotations in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2566–2649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ among herbicide treatments.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference in yield among herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2651–2710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides reduced secondary root development two weeks after emergence.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
All herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
secondary root developmente0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
2 wk after emergencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All herbicide treatments caused significant reductions in secondary root development 2 wk after emergence in both rotations and in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5753–5894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor plus atrazine reduced plant population in 1990 WGS.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
metolachlor plus atrazinee0
Outcome
plant populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metolachlor plus atrazine treatment reduced plant populations in the WGS rotation in 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6303–6392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend liming soil to pH 6.0 or higher.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
liming soils to a pH of 6.0 or highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“liming soils to a pH of 6.0 or higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7166–7203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend herbicide tolerant hybrids.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
use of hybrids more tolerant to acid amide herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of hybrids more tolerant to acid amide herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7205–7262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend replacing pre-emergent herbicides with post-emergent ones.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
replacement of pre‐emergent herbicides with post‐emergent onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“replacement of pre‐emergent herbicides with post‐emergent ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7271–7333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑

atrazine · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

atrazine · pest · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

metolachlor · pest · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

alachlor · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

37 papers: 27 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

herbicide · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.