Paper · 2013 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Metabolomic Profiling and Sensorial Quality of ‘Golden Delicious’, ‘Liberty’, ‘Santana’, and ‘Topaz’ Apples Grown Using Organic and Integrated Production Systems

Andreja Vanzo; Mojca Jenko; Urska Vrhovsek; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Apple quality was investigated in the scab-resistant 'Liberty', 'Santana', and 'Topaz' cultivars and the scab-susceptible 'Golden Delicious' cultivar. Trees subjected to the same crop load were cultivated using either an organic (ORG) or an integrated production (IP) system. Physicochemical properties, phenolic content, and sensorial quality of fruit from both systems were compared. There were no significant differences in fruit mass, starch, and total soluble solid content (the latter was higher in ORG 'Liberty') between ORG and IP fruit, whereas significantly higher flesh firmness was found in ORG fruit (except no difference in 'Golden Delicious'). Significantly higher total phenolic content in ORG fruit was found in 'Golden Delicious', whereas differences in other cultivars were not significant. Targeted metabolomic profiling of multiple classes of phenolics confirmed the impact of the production system on the 'Golden Delicious' phenolic profile as higher levels of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, neo- and chlorogenic acids, phloridzin, procyanidin B2+B4, -3-O-glucoside and -3-O-galactoside of quercetin, kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside, and rutin being found in ORG fruit. The results obtained suggested that scab resistance influenced the phenolic biosynthesis in relation to the agricultural system. Sensorial evaluation indicated significantly better flavor (except for 'Topaz') and better appearance of IP fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit mass, starch and total soluble solids generally did not differ significantly between systems.

Treatment
ORGe0
Outcome
fruit mass, starch, and total soluble solid contente0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
IPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences in fruit mass, starch, and total soluble solid content (the latter was higher in ORG 'Liberty') between ORG and IP fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic Liberty fruit had higher total soluble solids.

Material
'Liberty'e0
Treatment
ORGe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparatorOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the latter was higher in ORG 'Liberty'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fruit had significantly higher flesh firmness, except Golden Delicious.

Treatment
ORGe0
Outcome
flesh firmnesse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except no difference in 'Golden Delicious'e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher flesh firmness was found in ORG fruit (except no difference in 'Golden Delicious').”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Golden Delicious flesh firmness did not differ between systems.

Material
'Golden Delicious'e0
Outcome
flesh firmnesse1
Direction
no differencee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except no difference in 'Golden Delicious'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly higher flesh firmness was found in ORG fruit (except no difference in 'Golden Delicious').”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic Golden Delicious fruit had significantly higher total phenolic content.

Material
'Golden Delicious'e0
Treatment
ORGe0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher total phenolic content in ORG fruit was found in 'Golden Delicious'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other cultivars showed no significant difference in total phenolic content.

Outcome
total phenolic contente1

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences in other cultivars were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly higher total phenolic content in ORG fruit was found in 'Golden Delicious'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic Golden Delicious fruit had higher levels of multiple phenolics.

Material
‘Golden Delicious’e1
Treatment
ORGe0
Outcome
4-hydroxybenzoic acid, neo- and chlorogenic acidse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher levels of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, neo- and chlorogenic acids, phloridzin, procyanidin B2+B4, -3-O-glucoside and -3-O-galactoside of quercetin, kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside, and rutin being found in ORG fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Golden Delicious’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab resistance was suggested to influence phenolic biosynthesis in relation to production system.

Outcome
phenolic biosynthesise0
Qualifier
scab resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“scab resistance influenced the phenolic biosynthesis in relation to the agricultural system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated production fruit had significantly better flavor except Topaz.

Treatment
IPe0
Outcome
flavore0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
except for 'Topaz'e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly better flavor (except for 'Topaz') and better appearance of IP fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated production fruit had better appearance.

Treatment
IPe0
Outcome
appearancee0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“better appearance of IP fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cultivation system · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cultivation system · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.