Paper · 2020 · Applied Sciences

Selected Antioxidants in Organic vs. Conventionally Grown Apple Fruits

Dominika Średnicka-Tober; Marcin Barański; Renata Kazimierczak; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
37
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) is one of the most widely cultivated temperate fruits globally, gaining scientific interest as a rich source of antioxidants with a demonstrated beneficial human health impact. Since a growing number of consumers are increasingly seeking safe and healthy food options, alternative fruit production systems such as organic farming, and their potential to provide safe and nutritious foods, have been gaining increasing attention in the last decades. The aim of the presented study was, therefore, to analyse and to compare the concentrations of selected health-promoting antioxidants, such as phenolic acids, flavonols, and vitamin C, in fruits of three apple cultivars (Champion, Gala, and Idared) grown in conventional and certified organic orchards in Poland. All analyses were performed using the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Organic apples tested within the study, compared to the conventionally grown ones, were characterised by significantly higher concentrations of phenolic acids (av. >31%) and flavonols (av. >66%) with the identified differences being consistent in all three cultivars and two seasons. The greatest production system effect was observed in the case of Idared. Significant cultivar and production season effects on the concentration of the measured fruit phenolics, with strong interactions between the two factors, were also identified. Vitamin C content in the fruits was strongly dependent on the year-to-year differences in the fruit growing conditions. The study suggests that the organic production system has a potential to provide apple fruits rich in selected health-promoting phenolic antioxidants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apples had significantly higher phenolic acids than conventional apples.

Treatment
Organice0
Outcome
concentrations of phenolic acidse0
Direction
highere0
Value
>31%e0
Comparator
conventionally grown onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic apples tested within the study, compared to the conventionally grown ones, were characterised by significantly higher concentrations of phenolic acids (av. >31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apples had significantly higher flavonols than conventional apples.

Treatment
Organice0
Outcome
flavonolse0
Direction
highere0
Value
>66%e0
Comparator
conventionally grown onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic apples tested within the study, compared to the conventionally grown ones, were characterised by significantly higher concentrations of phenolic acids (av. >31%) and flavonols (av. >66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The organic-system effect was greatest for Idared.

Material
Idarede0
Outcome
production system effecte0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest production system effect was observed in the case of Idared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar significantly affected fruit phenolics.

Material
cultivare0
Outcome
concentration of the measured fruit phenolicse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant cultivar and production season effects on the concentration of the measured fruit phenolics, with strong interactions between the two factors, were also identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Production season significantly affected fruit phenolics.

Outcome
concentration of the measured fruit phenolicse0
Setting
production seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant cultivar and production season effects on the concentration of the measured fruit phenolics, with strong interactions between the two factors, were also identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and season strongly interacted in fruit phenolics.

Material
cultivare0
Outcome
concentration of the measured fruit phenolicse0
Setting
production seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant cultivar and production season effects on the concentration of the measured fruit phenolics, with strong interactions between the two factors, were also identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C content strongly depended on annual growing conditions.

Outcome
Vitamin C contente0
Setting
year-to-year differences in the fruit growing conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitamin C content in the fruits was strongly dependent on the year-to-year differences in the fruit growing conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest organic production can provide apples rich in phenolic antioxidants.

Outcome
organic production systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the organic production system has a potential to provide apple fruits rich in selected health-promoting phenolic antioxidants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1694 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cultivation system · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.