Paper · 2000 · International Journal of Horticultural Science

Rate of scab infection and quality parameters of apple fruit in organic and integrated production systems

I. Gonda; I. J. Holb; K. Bitskey

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, the rate of scab infection and quality parameters (content of vitamin-C, dry matter, sugar, total acids, specific weight, quality index and flesh firmness) of some apple cultivars are given, moreover, the relation between those characters was examined in two environmental systems (organic and integrated) in a rainy season. In the organic fruit production, scab infection of leaves was significantly higher than in the integrated system, in case of the same cultivars, which means that the rate of decrease in leaf area was heavier in the organic production. Cultivars did not differ statistically in parameters of inner content when the integrated system was compared to the organic one. Results did not show statistical difference between loss of leaf area caused by apple scab and the parameters of inner content, which is attributed to the regeneration of leaf area due to favourable weather conditions. Data on apple scab and inner content of the fruit justify essentially the environmental systems of apple production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apple production had significantly higher apple scab infection of leaves than integrated production in a rainy season.

Treatment
organic fruit productione2
Interactor
apple scabe5pathogen
Outcome
scab infection of leavese2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
integrated systeme2
Setting
rainy seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“of some apple cultivars are given”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the organic fruit production, scab infection of leaves was significantly higher than in the integrated system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–452 · show in text ↑
e5

“Results did not show statistical difference between loss of leaf area caused by apple scab and the parameters of inner content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a rainy season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apple production increased the rate of leaf area decrease.

Treatment
organic productione3
Outcome
rate of decrease in leaf areae3
Direction
heaviere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“of some apple cultivars are given”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–204 · show in text ↑
e3

“the rate of decrease in leaf area was heavier in the organic production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple cultivars did not differ in inner fruit content between organic and integrated production.

Treatment
organice4
Outcome
parameters of inner contente4
Direction
did not differ statisticallye4
Comparator
integrated systeme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“of some apple cultivars are given”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–204 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cultivars did not differ statistically in parameters of inner content when the integrated system was compared to the organic one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–703 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Loss of leaf area caused by apple scab did not show statistical association with fruit inner content parameters.

Interactor
apple scabe5pathogen
Outcome
parameters of inner contente5
Direction
did not show statistical differencee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“of some apple cultivars are given”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–204 · show in text ↑
e5

“Results did not show statistical difference between loss of leaf area caused by apple scab and the parameters of inner content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–831 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cultivation system · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.