Paper · 2005 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

The influence of the farming system on harvest of apple trees orchard and chemical composition of apples

Skirmantas Nominaitis; Vida Rutkovienė; Pranas Viškelis

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Research of apple productivity and quality was carried out in organic and intensive farming in northern and central Lithuania gardens. Standard analysis and several new methods were used to analyse apple productivity and quality. Apples grown in the same climate and soil conditions using organic farming technologies were characterised by better taste and transport features and better electrochemical parameters, but the yield is less and fruits have an inferior marketable look.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apples from organic farming had better taste and transport features than apples from intensive farming.

Treatment
organic farming technologiese1
Outcome
taste and transport featurese1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
intensive farminge0
Setting
northern and central Lithuania gardense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Research of apple productivity and quality was carried out in organic and intensive farming in northern and central Lithuania gardens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apples grown in the same climate and soil conditions using organic farming technologies were characterised by better taste and transport features”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apples from organic farming had better electrochemical parameters than apples from intensive farming.

Treatment
organic farming technologiese1
Outcome
electrochemical parameterse3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
intensive farminge0
Setting
northern and central Lithuania gardense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Research of apple productivity and quality was carried out in organic and intensive farming in northern and central Lithuania gardens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apples grown in the same climate and soil conditions using organic farming technologies were characterised by better taste and transport features”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–375 · show in text ↑
e3

“better electrochemical parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apples from organic farming had a lower yield than apples from intensive farming.

Treatment
organic farming technologiese1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
lesse2
Comparator
intensive farminge0
Setting
northern and central Lithuania gardense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Research of apple productivity and quality was carried out in organic and intensive farming in northern and central Lithuania gardens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apples grown in the same climate and soil conditions using organic farming technologies were characterised by better taste and transport features”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–375 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yield is less and fruits have an inferior marketable look”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits from organic farming had an inferior marketable look compared with intensive farming.

Treatment
organic farming technologiese1
Outcome
marketable looke2
Direction
inferiore2
Comparator
intensive farminge0
Setting
northern and central Lithuania gardense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Research of apple productivity and quality was carried out in organic and intensive farming in northern and central Lithuania gardens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apples grown in the same climate and soil conditions using organic farming technologies were characterised by better taste and transport features”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–375 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yield is less and fruits have an inferior marketable look”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–480 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.