Paper · 1980 · Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie

Early and late pest complexes on cotton, their control by aerial and ground application of insecticides and side‐effects on the predator fauna

A. Ghobrial; V. Dittrich

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season. A large scale field experiment featuring 25 ha plots and aerial ULV application was arranged to test the performance against the early pests Heliothis armigera Hübner and Tetranychus atlanticus McGregor, whereas the late season pests Earias insulana Boisduval and T. atlanticus were tested in 5000 m 2 plots with ground application equipment. Against the early pests chlordimeform with its ovicidal and behavior changing effects provided control for 3 weeks. Typical larvicides like endosulfan also provided consistently good bollworm control but were not quite as efficient against the mites. A Bacillus thuringiensis preparation was weak to start but improved its performance against bollworms in the course of the experiment. In the late season E. insulana was effectively controlled by chlordimeform and chlordimeform plus Bac. thuringiensis . The larvicides endsulfan, monocrotophos, and chlorpyrifos were only of intermediate efficacy, and mites could only be kept in check by the two treatments containing chlordimeform. Three species of insect predators were least affected by chlordimeform, even though their total numbers were reduced as detected in all posttreatment counts, but the reduction was compensated for by increasing predator populations. Conventional larvicides, especially TorbidanR and mephosfolan, reduced the predator populations by 93 and 98 % respectively. Zusammenfassung Über früh und spät in der Baumwollsaison auftretende Schädlingskomplexe, ihre Bekämpfung mit Insektiziden und deren Nebenwirkungen auf die Prädatorenfauna Die Wirkung moderner Insektizide auf einen Schädlings‐ und Schädlings‐Nützlingskomplex der irakischen Baumwollkultur wurde früh und spät in der Baumwollsaison getestet. Ein großflächiger Feldversuch mit 25 ha Parzellen wurde angelegt, um ihre Wirkung an den eingangs der Saison auftretenden Schädlingen Heliothis armigera Hübner und Tetranychus atlanticus McGregor nach ULV‐Applikation aus der Luft zu überprüfen. Die gegen Ende der Saison auftretende Schädlingskombination Earias insulana Boisduval und T. atlanticus wurde in 5000 m 2 Parzellen, nach konventioneller Behandlung vom Boden aus, geprüft. Gegen die Schädlinge der frühen Saison erzielte Chlordimeform mit seiner oviziden und das Verhalten ändernden Wirkung die besten Bekämpfungseffekte. Typische Larvizide, wie Endsulfan, zeigten ebenfalls regelmäßig guten Bekämpfungserfolg gegen H. armigera , waren aber weniger wirksam gegen Milben. Nach schwachem Start verbesserte sich die Wirkung eines Bac. thuringiensis ‐Präparates gegen H. armigera im Verlaufe des Experimentes. Als Schädling der fortgeschrittenen Saison wurde E. insulana von Chlordimeform und Chlordimeform plus Bac. thuringiensis wirksam bekämpft. Die Larvizide Endsulfan, Monocrotophos und Chlorpyrifos zeigten nur mittlere Wirkung. Milben konnten nur durch die beiden Chlordimeform enthaltenden Behandlungen unter Kontrolle gebracht werden. Drei Spezies von Insektenprädatoren zeigten sich von der Chlordimeform‐Behandlung vergleichsweise wenig beeinflußt, obgleich ihre Zahl vermindert war, wie es bei allen Auszählungen nach der Behandlung festzustellen war. Die Reduktion wurde jedoch durch den ansteigenden Trend in den Nützlings‐populationen wettgemacht. Dagegen reduzierten sie die konventionellen Larvizide, wie Torbidan R und Mephosfolan, um 93 bzw. 98%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlordimeform provided control of early-season pests in cotton for 3 weeks.

Treatment
chlordimeforme2
Outcome
controle2
Qualifier
for 3 weekse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Against the early pests chlordimeform with its ovicidal and behavior changing effects provided control for 3 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosulfan gave consistently good control of bollworms in cotton.

Treatment
endosulfane3
Interactor
bollwormHelicoverpa zeae3pest
Outcome
bollworm controle3
Qualifier
consistently goode3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e3

“Typical larvicides like endosulfan also provided consistently good bollworm control but were not quite as efficient against the mites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosulfan was not quite as efficient against mites in cotton.

Treatment
endosulfane3
Interactor
mitese3pest
Outcome
against the mitese3
Direction
not quite as efficiente3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e3

“Typical larvicides like endosulfan also provided consistently good bollworm control but were not quite as efficient against the mites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A Bacillus thuringiensis preparation improved its performance against bollworms in cotton over the course of the experiment.

Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensis preparatione4
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae4pest
Second interactor
Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
performance against bollwormse4
Direction
improvede4
Qualifier
weak to starte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e4

“A Bacillus thuringiensis preparation was weak to start but improved its performance against bollworms in the course of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In late season, chlordimeform and chlordimeform plus Bacillus thuringiensis effectively controlled Earias insulana in cotton.

Treatment
chlordimeform and chlordimeform plus Bac. thuringiensise5
Interactor
E. insulanaEarias insulanae5pest
Second interactor
Bac. thuringiensise5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
controllede5
Qualifier
effectivelye5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the late season E. insulana was effectively controlled by chlordimeform and chlordimeform plus Bac. thuringiensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosulfan, monocrotophos and chlorpyrifos were only of intermediate efficacy in cotton.

Treatment
endsulfan, monocrotophos, and chlorpyrifose6
Outcome
efficacye6
Qualifier
only of intermediatee6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e6

“The larvicides endsulfan, monocrotophos, and chlorpyrifos were only of intermediate efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mites were kept in check only by the two chlordimeform-containing treatments in cotton.

Treatment
the two treatments containing chlordimeforme7
Interactor
Tetranychus atlanticusTetranychus turkestanie1pest
Outcome
kept in checke7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“A large scale field experiment featuring 25 ha plots and aerial ULV application was arranged to test the performance against the early pests Heliothis armigera Hübner and Tetranychus atlanticus McGregor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“mites could only be kept in check by the two treatments containing chlordimeform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three insect predator species were least affected by chlordimeform in cotton.

Treatment
chlordimeforme1
Interactor
insect predatorse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
insect predatorse1
Direction
least affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Three species of insect predators were least affected by chlordimeform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total numbers of insect predators were reduced in all posttreatment counts after chlordimeform treatment in cotton.

Treatment
chlordimeforme1
Interactor
insect predatorse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
total numberse2
Direction
reducede2
Qualifier
in all posttreatment countse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Three species of insect predators were least affected by chlordimeform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1235 · show in text ↑
e2

“even though their total numbers were reduced as detected in all posttreatment counts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in predator numbers was compensated by increasing predator populations.

Treatment
chlordimeforme1
Interactor
insect predatorse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
predator populationse2
Direction
increasinge2
Qualifier
the reduction was compensated fore2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Three species of insect predators were least affected by chlordimeform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1235 · show in text ↑
e2

“the reduction was compensated for by increasing predator populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Torbidan R reduced predator populations by 93% in cotton.

Treatment
TorbidanRe1
Interactor
predator populationse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
predator populationse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
93e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Conventional larvicides, especially TorbidanR and mephosfolan, reduced the predator populations by 93 and 98 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mephosfolan reduced predator populations by 98% in cotton.

Treatment
mephosfolane1
Interactor
predator populationse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
predator populationse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
98 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of modern insecticides was tested on a pest‐predator complex occuring in Iraqi cotton in early and late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Conventional larvicides, especially TorbidanR and mephosfolan, reduced the predator populations by 93 and 98 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1520 · show in text ↑

chlorpyrifos · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

monocrotophos · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Bacillus thuringiensis · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

endosulfan · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chlordimeform · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

endosulfan · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.